A laboratory study and a field study (N = 168) investigated evaluative affect display (EAD), that is nonverbal evaluative reactions, toward leaders in small, face-to-face groups. Butler and Geis had found that female leaders received more negative affect than did male leaders, whereas both groups were judged equally competent on rating scales. Study 1 replicated their findings with a more economic coding method and improved methodological control. Study 2 examined EAD in routine meetings of real teams in different organizational field settings. Results suggest that EAD is a reliably observable phenomenon in field and laboratory settings. Generally, more negative affect was displayed toward female leaders across contexts. By contrast, there was no preference for men over women in competence ratings on scales.
Abele-Brehm, A. (2000a). Adual-impact model of gender and career-related processes. In T. Eckes& H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender(pp. 361-388). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Abele-Brehm, A. (2000b). Gender-gaps in early career development of university graduates. Why are women less successful than men?European Bulletin of Social Psychology, 12, 22-37.
3.
Athenstaedt, U. (2000). Normative Geschlechtsrollenorientierung (NGRO)—Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens [Development and validation of a normative gender role attitude scale]. Zeitschrift für Differenzielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 61-74.
4.
Bales, R. F.,& Cohen, S. P. (1982). SYMLOG—Ein System für die mehrstufige Beobachtung von Gruppen[SYMLOG—Asystem of the multi-layer observation of groups]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.
5.
Bargh, J. A.,& Wegner, D. M. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(pp. 446-496). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. K., & Ruppert, J. A. (2003). Social embodiment. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation(Vol. 43, pp. 43-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
Berger, J., Connor, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory. A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
8.
Biernat, M. (1995). The shifting standards model: Implications of stereotype accuracy for social judgment. In Y. Lee, L. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences(pp. 87-114). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
Biernat, M., & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence. Complexity in gender-based judgement and decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 707-724.
10.
Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544-557.
11.
Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20.
12.
Blanck, P. D. (1993). Interpersonal expectations. Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behaviour. Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279-307.
14.
Brown, V.,& Geis, F. L. (1984). Turning lead into gold. Evaluations of men andwomen leaders and the alchemy of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 811-824.
15.
Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp& G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbookof interpersonal communication(2nd ed., pp. 229-285). London: Sage.
16.
Butler, D., & Geis, F. L. (1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders. Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 48-59.
17.
Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender effects on influence and emergent leadership. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender & work(pp. 203-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Carli, L. L.,& Eagly, A. H. (2001). Gender, hierarchy and leadership. An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 629-636.
19.
Cohen, J. (1960). Acoefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
20.
Deaux, K.,& LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. InD. Gilbert, S. Fiske,& G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(pp. 788-827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Deaux, K.,& Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of genderrelated behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
22.
Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltmann, K., Ellyson, S. L.,& Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks. A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580-587.
23.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 781-797.
25.
Eagly, A. H.,& Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style. Ameta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
26.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
27.
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G.,& Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
28.
Ekman, P.,& Friesen, W. V. (1978). The facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
29.
Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659-676.
30.
Fiske, S., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model. Ten years later. In S. Chaiken (Ed.), Dual process theories in social psychology(pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford.
31.
Fiske, S.,& Neuberg, S. (1990). Acontinuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-74.
32.
Foddy, M., & Smithson, M. (1999). Can gender inequalities be eliminated?Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 307-324.
33.
Foschi, M. (1992). Gender and double standards for competence. In C. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction and inequality(pp. 181-207). New York: Springer.
34.
Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence. Annual Reviewof Sociology, 26, 21-42.
35.
Geis, F. L. (1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: Asocial psychological viewof gender. InA. E. Beall& R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender(pp. 9-54). New York: Guilford.
36.
Grammer, K., Fidova, V., & Fieder, M. (1997). The communication paradox and a possible solution: Toward a radical empiricism. In A. Schmitt, K. Atzwanger, K. Grammer, & K. Schäfer (Eds.), New aspects of human ethology(pp. 91-120). New York: Plenum.
37.
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845-857.
38.
Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences. Communication accuracy and expressive style. London: Hopkins.
39.
Hall, J. A., & Bernieri, F. J. (2001). Interpersonal sensitivity. Theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Paris: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley
42.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
43.
Henley, N. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44.
Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 86, 99-130.
45.
Kelly, J. R., & Spoor, J. R. (2005). Affective influence in groups. Retrieved March 20, 2005, from http://www.sydneysymposium.unsw.edu.au/2005/Papers/Kelly%20&%20Spoor.pdf
46.
Kestenberg-Amighi, J., Loman, S., Lewis, P.,& Sossin, K. M. (1999). The meaning of movement. Developmental and clinical perspectives of the Kestenberg Movement Profile. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
47.
Koch, S. C. (2004). Constructing gender: A lens-model inspired gender-communication approach. Sex Roles, 51, 171-186.
48.
Koch, S.C. (2005). Evaluative affect display towards male and female leaders of task-oriented groups II: Affect transmission among group members and leader reactions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
49.
Koch, S. C., Kruse, L., Schey, S.,& Thimm, C. (1999). Kommunikationseinstellungen und— erwartungen von Männern und Frauen am Arbeitsplatz[Communication attitudes and expectations ofwomen and men at theworkplace]. Retrieved March 20, 2005, from http://workcomm.uni-hd.de
50.
Koch, S. C., Mueller, B., Kruse, L., & Zumbach, J. (2005). Constructing gender in chat groups. Sex Roles, 53, 29-41.
51.
Krämer, N. C. (2001). Bewegende Bewegung—Sozio-emotionale Wirkungen nonverbalen Verhaltens und deren experimentelle Untersuchung mittels Computeranimation[Moving movement—Socio-emotional impact of nonverbal behavior and its experimental assessment by computer animation]. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
52.
Landis, J. R.,& Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
53.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
54.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
55.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
57.
Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193-210.
58.
Koch, S. C., Mueller, B., Kruse, L., & Zumbach, J. (2005). Constructing gender in chat groups. Sex Roles, 53, 29-41.
59.
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-656.
60.
Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. (1979). Sex differences in eavesdropping on nonverbal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 273-285.
61.
Snyder, M. (1984). When beliefs create reality. In L. Berkowicz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 18, pp. 248-305). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
62.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the attitudes toward women scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219-220.
63.
Wells, G. L.,& Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.
64.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Doing gender. In J. Lorber & S. Farrell (Eds.), The social construction of gender(pp. 13-37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
