This article describes the network approach to small groups. First, the core constructs that compose social network research are explained. The primary theories that provide the intellectual underpinning of the network approach are described, including theories of self-interest, theories of social exchange or dependency, theories of mutual or collective interest, cognitive theories, and theories of homophily. Highlights of the empirical work examining the internal and external networks of small groups is summarized. Finally, the primary challenges researchers face when applying the network perspective to small groups, and the primary benefits that can accrue to researchers who adopt that perspective, are enumerated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ancona, D. G.,& Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary—external activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
2.
Argote, L., Turner, M. E., & Fichman, M. (1989). To centralize or not to centralize: The effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 58-74.
3.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E.,& Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369-1397.
5.
Batagelj, V. A., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Pajek: Analysis and visualization of large networks. In M. Jünger & P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software(pp. 77-103). Berlin: Springer.
6.
Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 723-730.
7.
Bavelas, A.,& Barrett, M. (1951). An experimental approach to organisational communication. Personnel, 27, 386-397.
8.
Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1992). The core as solution to exclusionary networks. Social Networks, 14, 231-244.
9.
Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1997). Network exchange as a cooperative game. Rationality and Society, 9, 37-65.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education(pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
12.
Bourdieu, P.,& Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Brass, D. J. (1995a). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-79.
14.
Brass, D. J. (1995b). Creativity: It’s all in your social network. In C. M. Ford & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), Creative action in organizations(pp. 94-99). London: Sage.
15.
Brass, D. J. (2000). Networks and frog ponds: Trends in multilevel research. In K. J. Klein& S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations(pp. 557-571). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Brown, T. M., & Miller, C. E. (2000). Communication networks in task-performing groups: Effects of task complexity, time pressure, and interpersonal dominance. Small Group Research, 31, 131-157.
17.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
19.
Burt, R. S. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10, 5-46.
20.
Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research(pp. 31-56). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
21.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
22.
Carley, K. M. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56, 331-354.
23.
Carley, K. M. (2003). Dynamic network analysis. In R. Breiger, K. M. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: Workshop summary and papers. (pp. 134-145). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
24.
Coleman, J. S. (1957). Community conflict. New York: Free Press.
25.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
26.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
27.
Cook, K. S. (1977). Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relations. Sociological Quarterly, 18, 62-82.
28.
Cook, K. S. (1982). Network structures from an exchange perspective. In P. V. Marsden& N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis(pp. 177-218). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Cook, K. S., & Whitmeyer, J. M. (1992). Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 109-127.
30.
Cummings, J. N. (2004). NetVis Module: Dynamic visualization of social networks. Available online at http://www.netvis.org/
31.
Cummings, J. N., & Cross, R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25, 197-281.
32.
Davis, A., Gardner, B. B., & Gardner, M. R. (1941). Deep South: A social anthropological study of caste and class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles: The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 583-613.
34.
Downs, C. W., Clampitt, P. G.,& Pfeffer, A. (1988). Communication and organizational outcomes. In G. Goldhaber & G. Barnett (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication(pp. 171-211). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35.
Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange theory: Part I. Apsychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress(pp. 38-57). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange theory: Part II. Exchange relations and networks. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch,& B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress(pp. 58-87). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
37.
Flap, H., Bulder, B.,& Volker, B. (1998). Intra-organizational networks and performance: A review. Computational & Mathematical Organizational Theory, 4, 109-147.
38.
Freeman, L. C. (1992). The sociological concept of group: An empirical test of 2 models. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 152-166.
39.
Fulk, J., Flanagin, A. J., Kalman, M. E., Monge, P. R., & Ryan, T. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6, 60-87.
40.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1287-1303.
41.
Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In R. Collins (Ed.), Sociological theory 1983(pp. 105-130). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
43.
Guetzkow, H.,& Simon, H. A. (1955). The impact of certain communication nets upon organization and performance in task-oriented groups. Management Science, 1, 233-250.
44.
Haas, M. R. (2002). Acting on what others know: Distributed knowledge and team performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
45.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
46.
Harary, F., Norman, R. Z.,& Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed graphs. New York: John Wiley.
47.
Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
48.
Haunschild, P. R. (1993). Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 564-592.
49.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
50.
Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1975). Dynamic-model for social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 5, 5-20.
51.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
52.
Hollingshead, A. B., Fulk, J.,& Monge, P. (2002). Fostering intranet knowledge-sharing: An integration of transactive memory and public goods approaches. In P. Hinds& S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
Homans, G. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
54.
Huisman, M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2003). Statistical analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 253-287.
55.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
56.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
57.
Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H.,& Contractor, N. S. (in press). Applying a network perspective to small groups: Theory and research. In M. S. Poole& A. B. Hollingshead (Eds.), Theories of small groups: An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58.
Krackhardt, D., & Carley, K. M. (2003). PCANS model of structure in organizations (CASOS Working Papers). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University.
59.
Krackhardt, D.,& Kilduff, M. (1990). Friendship patterns and culture: The control of organizational diversity. American Anthropologist, 92, 142-154.
60.
Laumann, E. O. (1966). Prestige and association in an urban community. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
61.
Lazer, D. M. (2001). The co-evolution of individual and network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25, 69-108.
62.
Lazer, D.,& Katz, N. (2003a, Spring). Regulating opportunism: The role of embeddedness in teams(Working paper). Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
63.
Lazer, D., & Katz, N. (2003b, Spring). Building effective organizational networks: The role of teams(Working paper). Cambridge, MA: Center for Public Leadership, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
64.
Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38-50.
65.
Lessig, L. (2001). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House.
66.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Lipman-Blumen, J., & Leavitt, H. J. (2001). Hot groups: Seeding them, feeding them, and using them to ignite your organization. Oxford, England: Oxford Press.
68.
Markovsky, B., & Chaffee, M. (1995). Social identification and solidarity: A reformulation. Advances in Group Processes, 12, 249-270.
69.
Markovsky, B.,& Lawler, E. J. (1994). Anewtheory of group solidarity. InB. Markovsky, K. Heimer,& J. O’Brien (Eds.), Advances in group processes(Vol. 11, pp. 113-137). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
70.
Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10, 57-76.
71.
Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
72.
McPherson, J. M.,& Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face to face groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 370-379.
73.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298.
74.
Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
Monge, P. R., Fulk, J. K., Kalman, M., Flanagin, A. J., Parnassa, C., & Rumsey, S. (1998). Production of collective action in alliance-based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organization Science, 9, 411-433.
76.
Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what inwork groups and organizations. In L. Thompson, D. Messick, & J. Levine (Eds.), Sharing knowledge in organizations(pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77.
Nelson, R. E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 377-401.
78.
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart& Winston.
79.
Olson, M., Jr. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
82.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502-517.
83.
Samuelson, P. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387-389.
84.
Shaw, M. (1971). The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
85.
Shaw, M. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology(pp. 111-147). New York: Academic Press.
86.
Shaw, M. E. (1954). Some effects of unequal distribution of information upon group performance in various communication nets. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 547-553.
87.
Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflicts. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349-356.
88.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J.,& Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy ofManagement Journal, 44, 316-325.
89.
Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: Amulti-level analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 378-397.
90.
Stohl, C., & Putnam, L. (2003). Communication in context: Implications for the study of bona fide groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups(2nd ed., pp. 285-292). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
91.
Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Ogden, T. Y.,& Neale, M. A. (2003). Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Science, 49, 464-477.
92.
Tschan, F., & von Cranach, M. (1996). Group task structure, processes, and outcome. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology(pp. 92-121). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
93.
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237-252.
94.
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence(pp. 233-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
95.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674-698.
96.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
97.
Wasserman, S., & Robins, G. (2003). Introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p*. In Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
98.
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior(pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
99.
Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.
100.
Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman& S. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach(pp. 19-61). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
101.
Willer, D., & Skvoretz, J. (1997). Network connection and exchange ratios: Theory, predictions, and experimental tests. Advances in Group Processes, 14, 199-234.
