The purpose of this exploratory study is to visually map the dynamics of work groups using a method that emerged from chaos/complexity research. The verbal statements of members of 16 work groups were categorized using the Group Development Observation System. A Wavelet Transform Test was used to produce visual representations of the dynamic interaction patterns in each group's data string. Overall, the patterns that emerged in all 16 groups were similar in shape but different with regard to color, overall tone, and visual clarity. The groups were divided into three tiers based on these visual differences. Significant differences were noted among the tiers. The results support the concept that groups are complex adaptive systems and that the generated images provide a broader perspective of these systems, which may help researchers to explore human groups in more depth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, P. W., Arrow, K. J., & Pines, D. (Eds.). (1988). The economy as an evolving complex system. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5.
Bennis, W., & Shepard, H. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415-437.
6.
Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Braaten, L. J. (1974/1975). Developmental phases of encounter groups: A critical review of models and a new proposal. Interpersonal Development, 75, 112-129.
8.
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.
9.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Casti, J. (1994). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York: HarperCollins.
11.
Casti, J. (1996). Testing for chaos: Review of Chaos Data Analyzer program. Complexity, 2, 46-47
12.
Cattell, R. B. (1951). New concepts for measuring leadership in terms of group syntality. Human Relations, 4, 161-184.
13.
Cohen, J., & Stewart, I. (1994). The collapse of chaos: Discovering simplicity in a complex world. New York: Viking.
14.
Comte, A. (1855). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte (Harriet Martineau, Trans.). New York: Calvin Blanchard.
15.
Coveney, P., & Highfield, R. (1995). Frontiers of complexity: The search for order in a chaotic world. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
16.
Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (George Simpson & John A. Spaulding, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
17.
Dyke, C. (1990). Expectation and strategy in a nonlinear world. Systems Research, 7, 117-125.
18.
Dyke, C. (1997). The heuristics of ecological interaction. Advances in Human Ecology, 6, 49-74.
19.
Evans, N., & Jarvis, D. (1986). The Group Attitude Scale: A measure of attraction to group. Small Group Behavior, 17, 203-216.
20.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Keyton, J. (1993). Group termination: Completing the study of group development. Small Group Research, 24, 84-100.
23.
LeBon, G. (1960). The crowd. New York: Viking. (Original work published 1895)
24.
Lewin, K. (1947a). Frontiers in group dynamics, I. Human Relations, 1, 5-41.
25.
Lewin, K. (1947b). Frontiers in group dynamics, II. Human Relations, 1, 143-158.
26.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science (D. Cartwright, Ed.). New York: Harper.
27.
Luft, J. (1984). Group processes: An introduction to group dynamics. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
28.
Lundgren, D., & Knight, D. (1978). Sequential stages of development in sensitivity training groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 14, 204-222.
29.
Mann, R., Gibbard, G., & Hartman, J. (1967). Interpersonal style and group development. New York: John Wiley.
30.
Marcus, D. K. (1998). Studying group dynamics with the social relations model. Small Group Research, 2, 253-266.
31.
Mills, T. (1964). Group transformations: An analysis of a learning group. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Pepitone, A. (1981). Lessons from the history of social psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 972-985.
34.
Slater, P. (1966). Microcosm. New York: John Wiley.
35.
Sprott, J., & Rowlands, G. (1995). The Chaos Data Analyzer: The professional version. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, American Institute of Physics, Physics Academic Software.
36.
Stock, D., & Thelen, H. (1958). Emotional dynamics and group culture. New York: New York University Press.
37.
Thelen, H. A. (1954). Dynamics of groups at work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Theodorson, G. A. (1962). The function of hostility in small groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 256, 57-66.
39.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
40.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages in small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
41.
Verdi, A. F., & Wheelan, S. (1992). Developmental patterns in same-sex and mixed-sex groups. Small Group Research, 23, 256-278.
42.
Webster's new world dictionary. (1996). New York: Simon & Schuster.
43.
Wheelan, S. A. (1990). Facilitating training groups: A guide to leadership and verbal intervention skills. New York: Praeger.
44.
Wheelan, S. (1994a). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45.
Wheelan, S. (1994b). The Group Development Questionnaire: A manual for professionals. Philadelphia: GDQ Associates.
46.
Wheelan, S. (1996). Effects of gender composition and group status differences on member perceptions of group developmental patterns, effectiveness, and productivity. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 34, 665-686.
47.
Wheelan, S., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group development: Reality or illusion? Small Group Research, 34, 223-245.
48.
Wheelan, S., & Hochberger, J. (1996). Validation studies of the Group Development Questionnaire. Small Group Research, 27, 143-170.
49.
Wheelan, S., & Lisk, A. (2000). Cohort group effectiveness and the educational achievement of adult undergraduate students. Small Group Research, 31, 724-738.
50.
Wheelan, S., & McKeage, R. (1993). Developmental patterns in small and large groups. Small Group Research, 24, 60-83.
51.
Wheelan, S., Murphy, D., Tsumura, E., & Fried-Kline, S. (1998) Member perceptions of internal group dynamics and productivity. Small Group Research, 29, 371-393.
52.
Wheelan, S., & Tilin, F. (1999). The relationship between faculty group effectiveness and school productivity. Small Group Research, 30, 59-81.
53.
Wheelan, S., & Verdi, A. (1992). Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups: A methodological artifact? Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 27, 1-15.
54.
Wheelan, S., Verdi, A., & McKeage, R. (1994). The Group Development Observation System: Origins and applications. Philadelphia: GDQ Associates.
55.
Yalom, I. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
