Researchers have studied interpersonal interventions as a means of increasing the performance of work teams. However, for short-term teams working on contrived tasks of short duration—a combination common in research studies—interpersonal interventions do not seem to affect team performance as much as task interventions. Yet, for short-term teams working on real tasks of longer duration and for ongoing teams, the effects of interpersonal interventions on team performance are more positive. This article presents a temporal framework of teams and tasks that predicts the expectation of benefit, which in turn mediates the effectiveness of interpersonal interventions on team performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1993). Membership matters. Small Group Research, 24(3), 334-362.
2.
Bottger, P. C., & Yetton, P. W. (1987). Improving group performance by training in individual problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 651-657.
3.
Buller, P. F. (1986). The team building-task performance relation: Some conceptual and methodological refinements. Group and Organization Studies, 11(3), 147-168.
4.
Buller, P. F., & Bell, C. H. (1986). Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 305-328.
5.
Busch, E., Hamalainen, M., Suh, Y., Whinston, A., & Holsapple, C. W. (1991). Issues and obstacles in the development of team support systems. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2(1), 161-186.
6.
Carley, K. (1986). Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon. Instructional Science, 14, 381-438.
7.
Devine, D. J. (1999). Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict on group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30(5), 608-634.
8.
Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30(6), 678-711.
9.
Druskat, V. U. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31(3), 328-353.
10.
Eden, D. (1986). Team development: Quasi-experimental confirmation among combat companies. Group and Organization Studies, 11(3), 133-146.
11.
Friedlander, F. (1966). The impact of organizational training laboratories upon the effectiveness and interaction of ongoing work groups. Personnel Psychology, 20, 289-307.
12.
Ganster, D. C., Williams, S., & Poppler, P. (1991). Does training in problem solving improve the quality of group decisions? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 479-483.
13.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9-41.
14.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.
15.
Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
16.
Girling, R., & McManus, J. (1998). The future of software development in large organizations? (Case study in the application of RAD). Management Services, 42(4), 8-17.
17.
Hall, J., & Williams, M. S. (1966). A comparison of decision-making performances in established and ad hoc groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(2), 214-222.
18.
Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 553-585.
19.
Janz, B. D., Wehterbe, J. C., Davis, G. B., & Noe, R. A. (1997). Reengineering the systems development process: The link between autonomous teams and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 41-68.
20.
Kernaghan, J. A., & Cooke, R. A. (1990). Teamwork in planning innovative projects: Improving group performance by rational and interpersonal interventions in group process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(2), 109-116.
21.
Kimberly, J. R., & Nielsen, W. R. (1975). Organization development and change in organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 191-206.
22.
Larson, C. E. (1989). Teamwork: What must go right, what can go wrong? Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups, interaction, and performance. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
McGrath, J. E., & Arrow, H. (1993). Groups, tasks, and technology. Small Group Research, 24(3), 406-421.
25.
McKinney, K., & Graham-Buxton, M. (1993). The use of collaborative learning groups in the large class: Is it possible? Teaching Sociology, 21, 403-408.
26.
Mennecke, B. E., & Bradley, J. H. (1998). Making project groups work: The impact of structuring group roles on the performance and perception of information systems project teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 29(1), 30-36.
27.
Mennecke, B. E., Bradley, J. H., & McLeod, M. (1999). The impact of group process training and role assignments on the performance and perceptions of student IS project teams. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 29(1), 30-36.
28.
Mennecke, B. E., & Valacich, J. S. (1998). Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(2), 173-197.
29.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
30.
Paul, C. F., & Gross, A. C. (1981). Increasing productivity and morale in a municipality: Effects of organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(1), 59-78.
31.
Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4), 361-376.
32.
Sadler, C. (1994). Guidelines for group work. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 3(6), 8-11.
33.
Salas, E., Rozell, D., Mullen, B., & Driskell, J. E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30(3), 309-329.
34.
Sawyer, S., & Guinan, P. J. (1998). Software development: Processes and performance. IBM Systems Journal, 37(4), 552-568.
35.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
36.
Stephens, C. S., & Myers, M. E. (2000). Team process constraints: Testing the perceived impact on product quality and the effectiveness of team interactions. Proceedings International Academy for Information Management, 15, 159-169.
37.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). The developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
38.
Tudor, T. R., Trumble, R. R., & Diaz, J. J. (1996). Work-teams: Why do they often fail? S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 61(4), 31-40.
39.
Wheelan, S., & Kaeser, R. M. (1997). The influence of task type and designated leaders on development patterns in groups. Small Group Research, 28(1), 94-121.
40.
Woolley, A. W. (1998). Effects of intervention content and timing on group task performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(1), 30-46.
41.
Yamane, D. (1996). Collaboration and its discontents: Steps toward overcoming barriers to successful group projects. Teaching Sociology, 24(4), 378-383.
