This study investigated the potential moderating effects of productivity norms and identifiability of effort on the cohesion-performance relationship in team sports. The design was a 2 (high cohesion, low cohesion)×2 (high productivity norm, low productivity norm)×2 (high identifiability of an individual’s effort, low identifiability of an individual’s effort) factorial. Each participant (n = 324) read one of eight scenarios, with cohesion, norms, and identifiability systematically rotated, and indicated the probability that the individual would train during the off-season. An ANOVA showed a main effect for cohesion, F(1, 316) = 113.44, p < .0001, and norms, F(1, 316) = 19.61, p < .0001), and an interaction between cohesion and norms, F(1, 316) = 7.35, p = .007. The probability of off-season training was significantly higher for the high-cohesion-high-norms scenario than for the high-cohesion-low-norms scenario, with no differences under conditions of low cohesion. Directions for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anshel, M. H. (1995). Examining social loafing among elite female rowers as a function of task duration and mood. Journal of Sport Behavior, 18, 39-49.
2.
Bartis, S. , Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1988). Evaluation and performance: A two-edged knife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 242-251.
3.
Berkowitz, L. (1954). Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity. Human Relations, 7, 509-519.
4.
Carron, A. V. (1980). Social psychology of sport. Ithaca, NY: Mouvement Publications.
5.
Carron, A. V. , Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: FIT Technologies.
6.
Carron, A. V. , & Dennis, P. W. (1998). The sport team as an effective group. In J. M. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance (pp. 127-141). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
7.
Carron, A. V. , & Hausenblas, H. (1998). Group dynamics in sport. Morgantown, WV: FIT Technologies.
8.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
9.
Eagly, A. H. , Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
10.
Evans, C. R. , & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
11.
Everett, J. J. , Smith, R. E., & Williams, K. D. (1992). Effects of team cohesion and identifiability on social loafing in relay swimming performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 311-324.
12.
Greene, C. N. (1989). Cohesion and productivity in work groups. Small Group Behavior, 20, 70-86.
13.
Hardy, C. J. , & Crace, R. K. (1991). The effects of task structure and teammate competence on social loafing. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13, 372-381.
14.
Harkins, S. G. , & Jackson, J. M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 575-584.
15.
Harkins, S. G. , & Szymanski, K. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation: New wine in old bottles. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes and intergroup relations (Vol. 9, pp. 167-188). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Hausenblas, H. A. , Carron, A. V., & Mack, D. A. (1997). The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior: A meta analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 47-62.
17.
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: New York University Press.
18.
Karau, S. J. , & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
19.
Kim, M. S. (1992). Changes in performance norms of Japanese school athletic teams mid-to postseason. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 349-350.
20.
Kim, M. (1995). Performance norms and performance by teams in basketball competition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 770.
21.
Kogan, N. , & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk taking: A study of cognition and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
22.
Latané, B. , Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
23.
Locke, E. A. , & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Miesing, G. , & Preble, J. F. (1985). Group processes and performance in a complex business simulation. Small Group Behavior, 16, 325-338.
25.
Mitchell, T. R. (1982). People in organizations: An introduction to organizational behavior (2nd. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 9, 771-785.
27.
Mullen, B. , & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
28.
Munroe, K. , Estabrooks, P., Dennis, P., & Carron, A. (1999). A phenomenological analysis of group norms in sport teams. The Sport Psychologist, 13, 171-182.
29.
Oliver, L. W. (1990). The relationship of cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis and critique of the literature. Unpublished manuscript, U.S. Army Research Institute.
30.
Prapavessis, H. , & Carron, A. V. (1996). The effect of group cohesion on competitive state anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 64-74.
31.
Prapavessis, H. , & Carron, A. V. (1997). Sacrifice, cohesion, and conformity to norms in sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 3, 231-240.
32.
Schachter, S. , Ellertson, N., McBride, D., & Gregory, D. (1951). An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Human Relations, 4, 229-238.
33.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and group productivity. San Diego: Academic Press.
34.
Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 26-43.
35.
Swain, A. (1996). Social loafing and identifiability: The mediating role of achievement goal orientations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 337-344.
36.
Weiner, B. , & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.
37.
Williams, K. , Harkins, S., & Latané, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303-311.
38.
Worchel, S. , Cooper, J., & Goethals, G. R. (1991). Understanding social psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39.
Zaccaro, S. J. (1984). Social loafing: The role of task attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 99-106.
