Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) has recently been modified by Spink and Carron to assess group cohesion in exercise settings. However, as they point out, fitness classes possess a minimum number of criteria necessary to satisfy the requirements of a group. Therefore, applying an instrument developed to measure cohesion in sport teams to exercise classes may produce potential threats to the validity of the modified scale. Hence, the present study administered the modified GEQ to 307 exercise participants in the 3rd week of classes to test the factorial validity of the scale. The overall model was deemed an inadequate fit, and a modified version was suggested that retained the original four-factor structure. A second study administered the modified GEQ to 43 exercise participants at weeks 3 and 7 of typical aerobics classes and found that group cohesion did not develop over time and was not related to exercise adherence.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

Carmines, E. , & McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. Bohrnstedt & E. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Courneya, K. S. , & McAuley, E. (1995). Reliability and discriminant validity of subjective norm, social support, and cohesion in an exercise setting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 325-337.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 2, 135-138.

Gauvin, L. , & Rejeski, W. (1993). The exercise induced feeling inventory: Development and initial validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 403-423.

Hayduk, L. A. (1996). LISREL issues, debates, and strategies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Joreskog, K. G. , & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schutz, R. W. , Eom, H. J. , Smoll, F. L. , & Smith, R. E. (1994). Examination of the factorial validity of the group environment questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 226-236.

10.

Spink, K. S. , & Carron, A. V. (1992). Group cohesion and adherence in exercise classes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 78-86.

11.

Spink, K. S. , & Carron, A. V. (1993). The effects of team building on the adherence patterns of female exercise participants. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 39-49.

12.

Spink, K. S. , & Carron, A. V. (1994). Group cohesion effects in exercise classes. Small Group Research, 25, 26-42.

13.

Widmeyer, W. N. , Brawley, L. R. , & Carron, A. B. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. London: Sports Dynamics.

14.

Widmeyer, W. N. , Carron, A. V. , & Brawley, L. R. (1993). Group cohesion in sport and exercise. In R. N. Singer , M. Murphy , & L. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp. 672-692). New York: Macmillan.

15.

Zander, A. (1982). Making groups effective. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Group Environment Questionnaire and its Applicability in an Exercise Setting

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References