Accelerator/retarder admixtures are often added into concrete to improve its early-age strength, which needs to be effectively monitored during its hardening process. The electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique has validated its effectiveness for concrete hydration monitoring, this study attempted to extend the EMI technique to monitor 28-day age of strength gain in concrete that added with accelerator/retarder admixtures. Two types of new piezoelectric (PZT) transducers namely cement/aluminum embedded PZT (CEP/AEP) were proposed for EMI monitoring. The feasibility of the CEP and AEP was first verified via finite element analysis, where hydration heat effect on the two types of transducers was comparatively evaluated by numerical modeling. In the experiment, CEP/AEP transducers were applied to monitor the strength gain in concrete cubes, where characteristics of EMI signature and its statistical indices including root mean square deviation (RMSD) and mean absolute percentage deviation (MAPD) were analyzed and correlated to strength development in concrete. Monitoring results demonstrated that concrete hydration triggered by retarder/accelerator were successfully captured by EMI signature. RMSD and MAPD indices further indicated that AEP had preferable performance than CEP transducer for monitoring early-age strength gain of concrete, as it could immune from hydration heat effect.
AiDLuoHZhuH (2017) Diagnosis and validation of damaged piezoelectric sensor in electromechanical impedance technique. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures28(7): 837–850.
2.
AiDZhuHLuoH, et al. (2018) Mechanical impedance based embedded piezoelectric transducer for reinforced concrete structural impact damage detection: A comparative study. Construction and Building Materials165: 472–483.
3.
AiDLuoHZhuH (2019) Numerical and experimental investigation of flexural performance on pre-stressed concrete structures using electromechanical admittance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing128: 244–265.
4.
AiDLinCLuoH, et al. (2020) Temperature effect on electromechanical admittance based concrete structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring19(3): 661–692.
5.
AnnamdasVGMSohCK (2006) Embedded piezoelectric ceramic transducers in sandwiched beams. Smart Materials and Structures15: 538–549.
6.
ASTM (2012) Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. ASTM C494/C494M-12, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA.
7.
ChenJLiPSongG, et al. (2016) Piezo-based wireless sensor network for early-age concrete strength monitoring. Optik127(5): 2983–2987.
8.
DongWLiWLuN, et al. (2019) Piezoresistive behaviors of cement based sensor with carbon black subjected to various temperature and water content. Composites B178: 107488.
9.
FengQLiangYSongG (2019a) Real-time monitoring of early-age concrete strength using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. Journal of Aerospace Engineering32(1): 04018115.
10.
FengYSuYLuN, et al. (2019b) Meta concrete: Exploring novel functionality of concrete using nanotechnology. Engineered Science8: 1–10.
11.
GhafariEYuanYWuC, et al. (2018) Evaluation the compressive strength of the cement paste blended with supplementary cementitious materials using a piezoelectric-based sensor. Construction and Building Materials171: 504–510.
12.
GuHSongGDhondeH, et al. (2006) Concrete early-age strength monitoring using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Materials and Structures15(6): 1837–1845.
13.
HeikalM (2004) Effect of calcium formate as a hardening accelerator on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of pozzolanic cement pastes. Cement Concrete Research34(6): 1051–1056.
14.
HouPWangKQianK, et al. (2012) Effects of colloidal nanoSiO2 on fly ash hydration. Cement and Concrete Composite34(10): 1095–1103.
15.
KaurNBhallaS (2016) Numerical investigations on energy harvesting potential of thin PZT patches adhesively bonded on RC structures. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical241: 44–59.
16.
KongQHouSJiQ, et al. (2013) Very early age concrete hydration characterization monitoring using piezoceramic based smart aggregates. Smart Materials and Structures22(8): 085025.
17.
KongQFanSBaiX, et al. (2017) A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: Part I. Fabrication and electrical characterization. Smart Materials and Structures26(9): 22.
18.
KosmatkaSHKerkhoffBPanareseWC (2002) Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association.
19.
LiWTangZTamVet al. (2019) A review on durability of alkali-activated system from sustainable construction materials to infrastructure. ES Materials and Manufacturing4: 2–19.
20.
LiangCSunFPRogersCA (1994) Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material systems-determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures5: 12–20.
21.
LimYY (2014) Monitoring of concrete hydration using electromechanical impedance technique. In: 23rd Australasian conference on the mechanics of structures and materials, Bryon Bay, 9–12 December 2014.
22.
LimYYSohCK (2014) Towards more accurate numerical modeling of impedance based high frequency harmonic vibration. Smart Materials and Structures23: 035017 (12 pp.).
23.
LimYYTangZSSmithST (2018) Piezoelectric-based monitoring of the curing of structural adhesives: A novel experimental study. Smart Materials and Structures28(1): 015016.
24.
LuXLimYYSohCK (2018a) A novel electromechanical impedance-based model for strength development monitoring of cementitious materials. Structural Health Monitoring17(4): 902–918.
25.
LuXLimYYSohCK (2018b) Investigating the performance of ‘‘Smart Probe” based indirect EMI technique for strength development monitoring of cementitious materials—Modelling and parametric study. Construction and Building Materials172: 134–152.
26.
LuXLimYYIzadgoshasbI, et al. (2020) Strength development monitoring and dynamic modulus assessment of cementitious materials using EMI-Miniature Prism based technique. Structural Health Monitoring19(2): 373–389.
27.
MinTBChoISParkWJ, et al. (2014) Experimental study on the development of compressive strength of early concrete age using calcium-based hardening accelerator and high early strength cement. Construction and Building Materials64: 208–214.
28.
MoveniS (2003) Finite Element Analysis: Theory Application with ANSYS, 2nd edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
29.
NarayananAKocherlaASubramaniamKVL (2017) Embedded PZT sensor for monitoring mechanical impedance of hydrating cementitious materials. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation36: 64.
30.
NegiPChakrabortyTKaurN, et al. (2018) Investigations on effectiveness of embedded PZT patches at varying orientations for monitoring concrete hydration using EMI technique. Construction and Building Materials169: 489–498.
31.
NevilleAM (1996) Properties of Concrete, 4th edn. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
ParkGKabeyaKCudneyHH, et al. (1999) Impedance-based structural health monitoring for temperature varying applications. JSME International Journal Series A42: 249–258.
33.
ParkGSohnHFarrarCR, et al. (2003) Overview of piezoelectric impedance based health monitoring and path forward. Journal of Shock and Vibration Digest35: 451–463.
34.
ParkGFarrarCRRutherfordAC, et al. (2006) Piezoelectric active sensor self-diagnostics using electrical admittance measurements. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics128: 469–477.
35.
PI Ceramic (2016) Piezoelectric Ceramic Products: Fundamentals, Characteristics and Applications. Lederhose: PI Ceramic GmbH.
36.
PriyaCBSaravananTJBalamonicaK, et al. (2018) EMI based monitoring of early-age characteristics of concrete and comparison of serial/parallel multi-sensing technique. Construction and Building Materials191: 1268–1284.
37.
QuinnWKellyGBarrettJ (2012) Development of an embedded wireless sensing system for the monitoring of concrete. Structural Health Monitoring11(4): 381–392.
38.
RichardsonA (2007) Strength development of plain concrete compared to concrete with a non-chloride accelerating admixture. Structural Survey25(5): 418–423.
39.
SaravananTJBalamonicaKPriyaCB, et al. (2015) Comparative performance of various smart aggregates during strength gain and damage states of concrete. Smart Materials and Structures24: 085016 (13 pp.).
40.
SaravananTJBalamonicaKPriyaCB, et al. (2017) Piezoelectric EMI-based monitoring of early strength gain in concrete and damage detection in structural components. Journal of Infrastructure System23(4): 04017029.
41.
SepehryNShamshirsazMBastaniA (2010) Experimental and theoretical analysis in impedance-based structural health monitoring with varying temperature. Structural Health Monitoring10: 573–585.
42.
ShinSWOhTK (2009) Application of electro-mechanical impedance sensing technique for online monitoring of strength development in concrete using smart PZT patches. Construction and Building Materials23(2): 1185–1188.
43.
ShinSWQureshiARLeeJY, et al. (2008) Piezoelectric sensor based nondestructive active monitoring of strength gain in concrete. Smart Materials and Structures17(5): 055002.
44.
SohCKBhallaS (2005) Calibration of piezo-impedance transducers for strength prediction and damage assessment of concrete. Smart Materials and Structures14: 671–684.
45.
SonSWYeonJH (2012) Mechanical properties of acrylic polymer concrete containing methacrylic acid as an additive. Construction and Building Materials37: 669–679.
46.
SongGGuHMoYL (2008) Smart aggregates: Multi-functional sensors for concrete structures—A tutorial and a review. Smart Materials and Structures17(3): 033001.
47.
SuYFHanGAmranA, et al. (2019) Instantaneous monitoring the early age properties of cementitious materials using PZT-based electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. Construction and Building Materials225: 340–347.
48.
SuYFHanGNantungT, et al. (2020) Novel methodology on direct extraction of the strength information from cementitious materials using piezo-sensor based electromechanical impedance (EMI) method. Construction and Building Materials259: 119848.
49.
TawieRLeeHK (2010a) Monitoring the strength development in concrete by EMI sensing technique. Construction and Building Materials24: 1746–1753.
50.
TawieRLeeHK (2010b) Piezoelectric-based non-destructive monitoring of hydration of reinforced concrete as an indicator of bond development at the steel-concrete interface. Cement and Concrete Research40: 1697–1703.
51.
TongTFuDLevanderAX, et al. (2013) Suppression of thermal conductivity in InxGa1-xN alloys by nanometer-scale disorder. Applied Physics Letters102(12): 121906.
52.
VisalakshiTBhallaSGuptaA (2018) Monitoring early hydration of reinforced concrete structures using structural parameters identified by piezo sensors via electromechanical impedance technique. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing99: 129–141.
53.
WangDZhuH (2011) Monitoring of the strength gain of concrete using embedded PZT impedance transducer. Construction and Building Materials25(9): 3703–3708.
54.
YangCWuFChenK (2011) Research on set retarder of high and super high strength alkali-activated slag cement and concrete. Key Engineering Materials477: 164–169.
55.
YangYAnnamdasVGMWangC, et al. (2008a) Application of multiplexed FBG and PZT impedance sensors for health monitoring of rocks. Sensors8: 271–289.
56.
YangYLimYYSohCK (2008b) Practical issues related to the application of the electromechanical impedance technique in the structural health monitoring of civil structures: I—Experiment. Smart Materials and Structures17: 035008.
57.
YangYDivsholiBSSohCK (2010) A reusable PZT transducer for monitoring initial hydration and structural health of concrete. Sensors10: 5193–5208.
58.
ZouDDuCLiuT, et al. (2019) Effects of temperature on the performance of the piezoelectric-based smart aggregates active monitoring method for concrete structures. Smart Materials and Structures28: 035016.
