In this paper, a new embeddable spherical smart aggregate (SSA) was utilized to monitor concrete curing in very early age. Overcoming the limitation of the existing PZT-patch-based transducers, the SSA provides vital changing information in all directions of host structure. To verify the advantage of SSA in structural health monitoring (SHM), the sensitivities of SSA and smart aggregate (SA) in monitoring concrete cube deformation and stiffness variation were analyzed and compared by numerical simulation. The feasibility of SSA in monitoring the concrete hydration process was studied by experiments utilizing electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique. At last, four SSAs were embedded in a concrete column to study the practicality of SSA in monitoring the concrete curing process in very early age. The EMI signatures and the root mean square deviation (RMSD) values of the collected information from SSAs were analyzed. The results illustrate that the SSA is more sensitive than SA in monitoring the concrete deformation and stiffness variation. The data measured by SSA in monitoring the concrete hydration process fluctuates more obviously than the data recorded by SA. The new spherical transducer can effectively and reliably monitor the concrete hydration process.
AnnamdasVGMYaowenYCheeKS (2010) Impedance based concrete monitoring using embedded PZT sensors. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering1(3): 414–424.
2.
AzenhaMFariaRFigueirasH (2011) Thermography as a technique for monitoring early age temperatures of hardening concrete. Construction and Building Materials25(11): 4232–4240.
3.
BaptistaFGBudoyaDEAlmeidaVA, et al. (2014) An experimental study on the effect of temperature on piezoelectric sensors for impedance-based structural health monitoring. Sensors14(1): 1208–1227.
4.
BaptistaFGVieira FilhoJInmanDJ (2011) Sizing PZT transducers in impedance-based structural health monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal11(6): 1405–1414.
5.
BoisKJBenallyADNowakPS, et al. (1998) Cure-state monitoring and water-to-cement ratio determination of fresh Portland cement-based materials using near-field microwave techniques. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement47(3): 628–637.
6.
DeSGTaerweL (1996) Degree of hydration-based description of mechanical properties of early age concrete. Materials and Structures29(6): 335–344.
7.
DuGZhangJZhangJ, et al. (2017) Experimental study on stress monitoring of sand-filled steel tube during impact using piezoceramic smart aggregates. Sensors17(8): 1930.
8.
FanSLiWKongQ, et al. (2018) Monitoring of pin connection loosening using eletro-mechanical impedance: numerical simulation with experimental verification. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures29(9): 1964–1973.
9.
FengQLiangYSongG (2018) Real-time monitoring of early-age concrete strength using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. Journal of Aerospace Engineering32(1): 04018115.
10.
GaoWZhangGLiH, et al. (2018) A novel time reversal sub-group imaging method with noise suppression for damage detection of plate-like structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring25(3): e2111.
11.
GhirianAFallM (2013) Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical behavior of cemented paste backfill in column experiments. Part I: physical, hydraulic and thermal processes and characteristics. Engineering Geology164: 195–207.
12.
GuHSongGDhondeH, et al. (2006) Concrete early-age strength monitoring using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Materials and Structures15(6): 1837–1845.
13.
HuoLWangFLiH, et al. (2017) A fractal contact theory based model for bolted connection looseness monitoring using piezoceramic transducers. Smart Materials and Structures26(10): 104010.
14.
JinruiZTianyuanFHongyanM, et al. (2015) Monitoring setting and hardening of concrete by active acoustic method: effects of water-to-cement ratio and pozzolanic materials. Construction and Building Materials88: 118–125.
15.
KandaTMakinoAOnoT, et al. (2006) A micro ultrasonic motor using a micro-machined cylindrical bulk PZT transducer. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical127(1): 131–138.
16.
KesavanKRavisankarKParivallalS, et al. (2010) Experimental studies on fiber optic sensors embedded in concrete. Measurement43(2): 157–163.
17.
KongQSongG (2017) A comparative study of the very early age cement hydration monitoring using compressive and shear mode smart aggregates. IEEE Sensors Journal17(2): 256–260.
18.
KongQFanSBaiX, et al. (2017a) A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: part I. Fabrication and electrical characterization. Smart Materials and Structures26(9): 095050.
19.
KongQFanSMoYL, et al. (2017b) A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: part II. Numerical and experimental verifications. Smart Materials and Structures26(9): 095051.
20.
KongQHouSJiQ, et al. (2013) Very early age concrete hydration characterization monitoring using piezoceramic based smart aggregates. Smart Materials and Structures22(8): 085025.
21.
KongQRobertRSilvaP, et al. (2016) Cyclic crack monitoring of a reinforced concrete column under simulated pseudo-dynamic loading using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. Applied Sciences6(11): 341.
22.
LaiWLKindTWiggenhauserH (2010) A study of concrete hydration and dielectric relaxation mechanism using ground penetrating radar and short-time Fourier transform. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing2010(1): 1–14.
23.
LiangCSunFPRogersCA (1994) Coupled electromechanical analysis of adaptive material system-determination of actuator power consumption and system energy transfer. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures5(1): 12–20.
24.
LiNWangFSongG (2020) New entropy-based vibro-acoustic modulation method for metal fatigue crack detection: an exploratory study. Measurement150: 107075.
25.
LimYYKwongKZLiewWYH, et al. (2016) Non-destructive concrete strength evaluation using smart piezoelectric transducer-a comparative study. Smart Materials and Structures25(8): 085021.
26.
LiuYZhangMYinX, et al. (2020) Debonding detection of reinforced concrete (RC) beam with near-surface mounted (NSM) pre-stressed carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) plates using embedded piezoceramic smart aggregates (SAs). Applied Sciences10(1): 50.
27.
LiuZZhangYJiangQ, et al. (2011) In situ continuously monitoring the early age microstructure evolution of cementitious materials using ultrasonic measurement. Construction and Building Materials25(10): 3998–4005.
28.
LuXLimYYSohCK (2018) A novel electromechanical impedance-based model for strength development monitoring of cementitious materials. Structural Health Monitoring-an International Journal17(4): 902–918.
29.
LuYMaHLiZ (2015) Ultrasonic monitoring of the early-age hydration of mineral admixtures incorporated concrete using cement-based piezoelectric composite sensors. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures26(3): 280–291.
30.
LuoDIbrahimZYangH, et al. (2013) Use of tapered optical fiber sensors in study of the hydration process of cement paste. IEEE Sensors Journal13(9): 3415–3420.
31.
LuoMLiWHeiC, et al. (2016) Concrete infill monitoring in concrete-filled FRP tubes using a PZT-based ultrasonic time-of-flight method. Sensors16(12): 2083.
32.
MascarenasDLToddMDParkG, et al. (2007) Development of an impedance-based wireless sensor node for structural health monitoring. Smart Materials and Structures16(6): 2137–2145.
33.
MoYLHowserRNGautamA, et al. (2020) Temperature sensing and hydration study of carbon nanofiber aggregates. Journal of Aerospace Engineering33(2): 04020002.
34.
NaWSBaekJ (2018) A review of the piezoelectric electromechanical impedance based structural health monitoring technique for engineering structures. Sensors18(5): 1307.
35.
NegiPChakrabortyTKaurN, et al. (2018) Investigations on effectiveness of embedded PZT patches at varying orientations for monitoring concrete hydration using EMI technique. Construction and Building Materials169: 489–498.
36.
PakGCudneyHHInmanDJ (2000) Impedance-based health monitoring of civil structural components. Journal of Infrastructure Systems6(4): 153–160.
37.
ParkHWSohnHLawKH, et al. (2007) Time reversal active sensing for health monitoring of a composite plate. Journal of Sound and Vibration302(1–2): 50–66.
38.
SaravananTJBalamonicaKPriyaCB, et al. (2015) Comparative performance of various smart aggregates during strength gain and damage states of concrete. Smart Materials and Structures24(8): 85016.
39.
ShenPLuLHeY, et al. (2016) Hydration monitoring and strength prediction of cement-based materials based on the dielectric properties. Construction and Building Materials126: 179–189.
40.
ShinSWOhTK (2009) Application of electro-mechanical impedance sensing technique for online monitoring of strength development in concrete using smart PZT patches. Construction and Building Materials23(2): 1185–1188.
41.
SongGGuHMoYL, et al. (2007) Concrete structural health monitoring using embedded piezoceramic transducers. Smart Materials and Structures16(4): 959–968.
42.
SubramaniamKVMohsenJPShawCK, et al. (2002) Ultrasonic technique for monitoring concrete strength gain at early age. ACI Materials Journal99(5): 458–462.
43.
SunZJ (2008) Estimating volume fraction of bound water in Portland cement concrete during hydration based on dielectric constant measurement. Magazine of Concrete Research60(3): 205–210.
44.
TawieRLeeHK (2010) Monitoring the strength development in concrete by EMI sensing technique. Construction and Building Materials24(9): 1746–1753.
45.
TremsinASLehmannEHMcPhateJB, et al. (2015) Quantification of cement hydration through neutron radiography with scatter rejection. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science62(3): 1288–1294.
46.
VenugopalVPWangG (2015) Modeling and analysis of lamb wave propagation in a beam under lead zirconate titanate actuation and sensing. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures26(13): 1679–1698.
47.
Vieira FilhoJBaptistaFGInmanDJ (2011) Time-domain analysis of piezoelectric impedance-based structural health monitoring using multilevel wavelet decomposition. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing25(5): 1550–1558.
48.
WangBHuoLChenD, et al. (2017) Impedance-based pre-stress monitoring of rock bolts using a piezoceramic-based smart washer-a feasibility study. Sensors17(2): 250.
49.
WangDZhuH (2011) Monitoring of the strength gain of concrete using embedded PZT impedance transducer. Construction and Building Materials25(9): 3703–3708.
50.
WangDSongHZhuH (2014) Embedded 3d electromechanical impedance model for strength monitoring of concrete using a PZT transducer. Smart Materials and Structures23(11): 11501911.
51.
WangFHoSCMHuoL, et al. (2018) A novel fractal contact-electromechanical impedance model for quantitative monitoring of bolted joint looseness. IEEE Access6: 40212–40220.
52.
WangFHuoLSongG (2018) A piezoelectric active sensing method for quantitative monitoring of bolt loosening using energy dissipation caused by tangential damping based on the fractal contact theory. Smart Materials and Structures27(1): 015023.
53.
WangTSongGWangZ, et al. (2013) Proof-of-concept study of monitoring bolt connection status using a piezoelectric based active sensing method. Smart Materials and Structures22(8): 087001.
54.
WangYZhuXHaoH, et al. (2009) Guided wave propagation and spectral element method for debonding damage assessment in RC structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration324(3–5): 751–772.
55.
WuAHeSRenY, et al. (2019) Design of a new stress wave-based pulse position modulation (PPM) communication system with piezoceramic transducers. Sensors19(3): 558.
56.
XuDSouravBWangY, et al. (2015) Temperature and loading effects of embedded smart piezoelectric sensor for health monitoring of concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials76: 187–193.
57.
XuKKongQChenS, et al. (2017) Early determination of the presence of low strength concrete in reinforced concrete beam-column joints using piezoceramic-based transducers. IEEE Sensors Journal17(11): 3244–3250.
58.
XuYGLiuGR (2002) A modified electro-mechanical impedance model of piezoelectric actuator-sensors for debonding detection of composite patches. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures13(6): 389–396.
59.
YangYDivsholiBSSohCK (2010) A reusable PZT transducer for monitoring initial hydration and structural health of concrete. Sensors10(5): 5193–5208.
60.
YangYHuYLuY (2008) Sensitivity of PZT impedance sensors for damage detection of concrete structures. Sensors8(1): 327–346.
61.
YinHWangTYangD, et al. (2016) A smart washer for bolt looseness monitoring based on piezoelectric active sensing method. Applied Sciences6(11): 320.
62.
YingWHongH (2014) Modelling of guided wave propagation with spectral element: application in structural engineering. Applied Mechanics and Materials553: 687–692.
63.
ZhangCYuXAlexanderL, et al. (2016) Piezoelectric active sensing system for crack detection in concrete structure. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring6(1): 129–139.
64.
ZhangJLiYHuangY, et al. (2018) A feasibility study on timber moisture monitoring using piezoceramic transducer-enabled active sensing. Sensors18(9): 3100.
65.
ZhangJXuJGuanW, et al. (2018) Damage detection of concrete-filled square steel tube (CFSST) column joints under cyclic loading using piezoceramic transducers. Sensors18(10): 3266.
66.
ZhouLZhengYSongG, et al. (2019) Identification of the structural damage mechanism of BFRP bars reinforced concrete beams using smart transducers based on time reversal method. Construction and Building Materials220: 615–627.
67.
ZouDLiuTHuangY, et al. (2014) Feasibility of water seepage monitoring in concrete with embedded smart aggregates by p-wave travel time measurement. Smart Materials and Structures23(6): 067003.
68.
ZouXChaoAWuN, et al. (2013) A novel fabry-perot fiber optic temperature sensor for early age hydration heat study in portland cement concrete. Smart Structures and Systems12(1): 41–54.
