A technique based on the electrical resistance change of a network of carbon nanotubes within a polymer composite was implemented to assess damage caused by low-velocity impact in multiscale hierarchical composites. The influence of the electrode configuration in 100 mm x 100 mm x 1.7 mm plates is addressed. Three electrode configurations are evaluated, namely, a grid on the impacted surface, a grid on the opposite (non-impacted) surface, and through the thickness of the plate. Upon impact, matrix cracking, delamination, and fiber rupture cause disruption and redistribution of the electrical network of carbon nanotubes, whose electrical resistance changes can be correlated with such damage. It is found that the non-impacted surface exhibits a higher fractional change of electrical resistance and hence higher sensitivity to damage. The results obtained using the electrical technique showed a good correlation with damage detected by independent measurements by digital holographic interferometry and ultrasonic inspections.
AbryJCBochardSChateauminoisA, et al. (1999) In situ detection of damage in CFRP laminates by electrical resistance measurements. Composites Science and Technology59(6): 925–935.
3.
Al-BahraniMCreeA (2019) A simple criterion to evaluate the degree of damage in composite materials after sudden impact loads by exploiting the MWCNTs piezoresistive property. Carbon150: 505–517.
4.
AlexopoulosNDBartholomeCPoulinP, et al. (2010) Structural health monitoring of glass fiber reinforced composites using embedded carbon nanotube (CNT) fibers. Composites Science and Technology70(2): 260–271.
AlyKBradfordPD (2019) Real-time impact damage sensing and localization in composites through embedded aligned carbon nanotube sheets. Composites Part B: Engineering162: 522–531.
7.
AngelidisNIrvingPE (2007) Detection of impact damage in CFRP laminates by means of electrical potential techniques. Composites Science and Technology67(3–4): 594–604.
8.
ASTM D5628-18 (2018) Standard test method for impact resistance of flat, rigid plastic specimens by means of a falling dart (tup or falling mass).
9.
AugustinTKarstenJFiedlerB (2017) Detection and localization of impact damages in carbon nanotube-modifies epoxy adhesive films with printed circuits. Structural Health Monitoring17(5): 1166–1177.
10.
BaltopoulosAPolydoridesNPambaguianL, et al. (2015) Exploiting carbon nanotube networks for damage assessment of fiber reinforced composites. Composites Part B: Engineering76: 149–158.
11.
BandaruAKChavanVVAhmadS, et al. (2016) Low velocity impact response of 2D and 3D Kevlar/polypropylene composites. International Journal of Impact Engineering93: 136–143.
12.
BarouniAKDhakalHN (2019) Damage investigation and assessment due to low-velocity impact on flax/glass hybrid composite plates. Composites Structures226: 111224.
13.
BerketisKTzetzisDHoggPJ (2009) Impact damage detection and degradation monitoring of wet GFRP composites using noncontact ultrasonics. Polymer Composites30(8): 1043–1049.
14.
BogenfeldRKreikemeierJWilleT (2018) Review and benchmark study on the analysis of low-velocity impact on composite materials. Engineering Failure Analysis86: 72–99.
15.
BullDJSpearingSMSinclairI, et al. (2013) Three-dimensional assessment of low velocity impact damage in particle toughened composite laminates using micro-focus X-ray computed tomography and synchrotron radiation laminography. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing52: 62–69.
16.
ChungDDL (2001) Structural health monitoring by electrical resistance measurement. Smart Materials and Structures10(4): 624–636.
17.
DaiHGalloGJSchumacherT, et al. (2016) A novel methodology for spatial damage detection and imaging using a distributed carbon nanotube-based composite sensor combined with electrical impedance tomography. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation35: 26–41.
18.
DaviesGAOZhangX (1995) Impact damage prediction in carbon composite structures. International Journal of Impact Engineering16(1): 149–170.
19.
De la TorreMHernándezMSFlores-MorenoJM, et al. (2016) Laser speckle based digital optical methods in structural mechanics: a review. Optics and Lasers in Engineering87: 32–58.
20.
Escalona-GalvisLWDiaz-MontielPVenkataramanS (2018) Optimum electrode configurations for two-probe, four-probe and multi-probe schemes in electrical resistance tomography for delamination identification in carbon fiber reinforced composites. Journal of Composite Sciences2: 29.
21.
FahrAKendeilAY (1992) Ultrasonic C-scan inspection of composite materials. Engineering Journal of Qatar University5: 201–222.
22.
GalloGJThostensonET (2016) Spatial damage detection in electrically anisotropic fiber-reinforced composites using carbon nanotube networks. Composites Structures141: 14–23.
23.
GaoLChouTWThstensonET, et al. (2011) In situ sensing of impact damage in epoxy/glass fiber composites using percolating carbon nanotube networks. Carbon49: 3371–3391.
24.
Gómez-del RíoTZaeraRBarberoE, et al. (2005) Damage in CFRPs due to low velocity impact at low temperature. Composites Part B: Engineering36(1): 41–50.
25.
GungorSBakisCE (2016) Indentation damage detection in glass/epoxy composite laminates with electrically tailored conductive nanofiller. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures27(5): 679–688.
26.
HassanHSemperlottiFWangKW, et al. (2018) Enhanced imaging of piezoresistive nanocomposites through conductivity changes in electrical impedance tomography. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures29(9): 1850–1861.
27.
HiranoYTodorokiA (2007) Damage identification of woven graphite/epoxy composite beam using the electrical resistance change method. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures18(3): 253–263.
28.
Isaac-MedinaBKSAlonzo-GarcíaAAvilésF (2019) Electrical self-sensing of impact damage in multiscale hierarchical composites with tailored location of carbon nanotube networks. Structural Health Monitoring18(3): 806–818.
29.
JanBWKimCG (2017) Real-time detection of low-velocity impact-induced delamination onset in composite laminates for efficient management of structural health. Composites Part B: Engineering123: 124–135.
30.
KostopoulosVVavouliotisAKarapappasP, et al. (2009) Damage monitoring of carbon fiber reinforced laminates using resistance measurements. Improving sensitivity using carbon nanotube doped epoxy matrix system. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures20(9): 1025–1034.
31.
Ku-HerreraJJAvilésFNistalA, et al. (2015) Interactions between the glass fiber coating and oxidized carbon nanotubes. Applied Surface Science330: 383–392.
32.
Ku-HerreraJJMay-PatAAvilésF (2016a) An assessment of the role of fiber coating and suspending fluid on the deposition of carbon nanotubes onto glass fibers for multiscale composites. Advanced Engineering Materials18(6): 963–971.
33.
Ku-HerreraJJPacheco-SalazarOFRíos-SoberanisCR, et al. (2016b) Self-sensing of damage progression in unidirectional multiscale hierarchical composites subjected to cyclic tensile loading. Sensors16(3): 1–13.
34.
LéonardFSteinJSoutisC, et al. (2017) The quantification of impact damage distribution in composite laminates by analysis of X-ray computed tomograms. Composites Science and Technology152: 139–148.
35.
LohKJHouTCLynchJP, et al. (2009) Carbon nanotube sensing skins for spatial strain and impact damage identification. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation28: 9–25.
36.
LoyolaBRBriggsTMArroncheL, et al. (2013) Detection of spatially distributed damage in fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Structural Health Monitoring12(3): 225–239.
37.
LuSTianCWangX, et al. (2017) Health monitoring for composite materials with high linear and sensitivity GNPs/epoxy flexible strain sensors. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical267: 409–416.
38.
MontiMNataliMPetrucciR, et al. (2011) Impact damage sensing in glass fiber reinforced composites based on carbon nanotubes by electrical resistance measurements. Journal of Applied Polymer Science122(4): 2829–2836.
39.
MoricheRSánchezMJiménez-SuárezA, et al. (2016) Strain monitoring mechanisms of sensors based on the addition of graphene nanoplatelets into an epoxy matrix. Composites Science and Technology123: 65–70.
40.
NaghashpourAVan HoaS (2015) A technique for real-time detecting, locating, and quantifying damage in large polymer composite structures made of carbon fibers and carbon nanotube networks. Structural Health Monitoring14(1): 35–45.
41.
ProperAZhangWBartolucciS, et al. (2009) In-situ detection of impact damage in composites using carbon nanotube sensor networks. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters1(1): 3–7.
42.
QianHGreenhalghESShafferMSP, et al. (2010) Carbon nanotube-based hierarchical composites: a review. Journal of Materials Chemistry20(23): 4751–4762.
43.
RichardsonMOWWisheartMJ (1996) Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing27(12): 1123–1131.
44.
RohHDLeeHParkYB (2016) Structural health monitoring of carbon-material-reinforced polymers using electrical resistance measurement. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-green Technology3(3): 311–321.
45.
SánchezADe la TorreMMendoza-SantoyoF, et al. (2014) Simultaneous 3D digital holographic interferometry for strain measurements validated with FEM. Optics and Lasers in Engineering52: 178–183.
46.
SaucedoTDe la TorreMHMendoza-SantoyoF, et al. (2010) Digital holographic interferometer using simultaneously three lasers and a single monochrome sensor for 3D displacement measurements. Optics Express18(19): 867–875.
47.
SchoeppnerGAAbrateS (2000) Delamination threshold loads for low velocity impact on composite laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing31(9): 903–915.
48.
SchulteKBaronC (1989) Load and failure analyses of CFRP laminates by means of electrical resistivity measurements. Composites Science and Technology36(1): 63–76.
49.
TallmanTNGungorSKooGM, et al. (2017) On the inverse determination of displacements, strains, and stresses in a carbon nanofiber/polyurethane nanocomposite from conductivity data obtained via electrical impedance tomography. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures28(18): 2617–2629.
50.
TallmanTNGungorSWangKW, et al. (2014) Damage detection via impedance tomography in glass fiber/epoxy laminates with carbon black filler. Structural Health Monitoring14(1): 100–109.
51.
VietsCKaysserSSchulteK (2014) Damage mapping of GFRP via electrical resistance measurements using nanocomposite epoxy matrix systems. Composites Part B: Engineering65: 80–88.
52.
WangDChungDDL (2006) Comparative evaluation of the electrical configurations for the two-dimensional electric potential method of damage monitoring in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. Smart Materials and Structures15: 1332–1344.
53.
WangDWangSChungDDL, et al. (2006a) Comparison of the electrical resistance and potential techniques for the self-sensing of damage in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures17: 853–861.
54.
WangSChungDDLChungJH (2005) Impact damage of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites studied by electrical resistance measurement. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing36(12): 1707–1715.
55.
WangSWangDChungDDL (2006b) Method of sensing impact damage in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites by electrical resistance measurement. Journal of Materials Science41(8): 2281–2289.
56.
WangXChungDDL (1997) Electromechanical behavior of carbon fiber. Carbon35: 706–709.
57.
ZhangDYeLWangD, et al. (2012) Assessment of transverse impact damage in GF/EP laminates of conductive nanoparticles using electrical resistivity tomography. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing43: 1587–1598.
58.
ZhaoZTengKLiN, et al. (2017) Mechanical, thermal and interfacial performances of carbon fiber reinforced composites flavored by carbon nanotube in matrix/interface. Composites Structures159: 761–722.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
