Spherically focused transducers have been long relied on to target acoustic energy delivery. Yet, these structures have limitations with respect to size and mobility for medical treatment applications. Recent developments in the field of reconfigurable structures reveal that the ancient art of origami inspires new platforms by which to enable spherical shapes that are additionally foldable for ease of transport. This research explores the opportunities for a unique, flat foldable doubly curved tessellated array to enable wave focusing capability similar to an ideal medical transducer shape: the spherical cap transducer. An analytical model of the doubly curved array is created and validated against data collected from a proof-of-concept array. The model is then leveraged to understand how the array design and complexity relatively govern the wave focusing capability. The findings show that doubly curved acoustic arrays do not require excessive facet refinement to achieve wave focusing similar to nominal spherically focused transducers. Yet, the optimal frequencies for which such capability is borne out vary substantially on the basis of array design. The discoveries of this research motivate future consideration of flat foldable doubly curved acoustic arrays for potential implementation into medical transducer development for hard-to-access surgical treatments.
AlharbiSChaudhariSInshaarA, et al. (2018) E-textile origami dipole antennas with graded embroidery for adaptive RF performance. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters17: 2218–2222.
2.
AronovBBrownDABachandCL, et al. (2012) Analysis of unidirectional broadband piezoelectric spherical shell transducers for underwater acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America131: 2079–2090.
3.
CantinottiMGiordanoRCoranaG, et al. (2018) Use of linear and convex ultrasound transducers for evaluation of retrosternal area in patients after cardiac surgery. Echocardiography35: 100–103.
4.
CybulskiJSClementsJPrakashM (2014) Foldscope: origami-based paper microscope. PLoS ONE9: e98781.
5.
DudteLHVougaETachiT, et al. (2016) Programming curvature using origami tessellations. Nature Materials15: 583–588.
6.
EbbiniESCainCA (1991) A spherical-section ultrasound phased array applicator for deep localized hyperthermia. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering38: 634–643.
7.
FernandesRGraciasDH (2012) Self-folding polymeric containers for encapsulation and delivery of drugs. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews64: 1579–1589.
8.
GattasJMWuWYouZ (2013) Miura-base rigid origami: parameterizations of first-level derivative and piecewise geometries. Journal of Mechanical Design135: 111011.
9.
JensenJASvendsenNB (1992) Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized and excited ultrasound transducers. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control39: 262–267.
10.
JiYHLiQLYangY, et al. (2008) Newly progress and application of high intensity focused ultrasound in medical. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics25: 759–780.
11.
KennedyJE (2005) High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nature Reviews Cancer5: 321–327.
12.
KinslerLEFreyARCoppensAB, et al. (1999) Fundamentals of Acoustics. 4th ed.New York: Wiley-VCH.
13.
KoduruJPRoseJL (2012) Transducer arrays for omnidirectional guided wave mode control in plate like structures. Smart Materials and Structures22: 015010.
14.
KuribayashiKTsuchiyaKYouZ (2006) Self-deployable origami stent grafts as a biomedical application of Ni-rich TiNi shape memory alloy foil. Materials Science and Engineering A419: 131–137.
15.
LiQTsaiCSSottiniS, et al. (1985) Light propagation and acousto-optic interaction in a LiNbO3 spherical waveguide. Applied Physics Letters46: 707–709.
16.
LiuXYaoSCookBS, et al. (2015) An origami reconfigurable axial-mode bifilar helical antenna. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation63: 5897–5903.
17.
LyndDTHarneRL (2017) Strategies to predict radiated sound fields from foldable, Miura-ori-based transducers for acoustic beamfolding. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America141: 480–489.
18.
LyndDTZouCCrumpJ, et al. (2017) Directive and focused acoustic wave radiation by tessellated transducers with folded curvatures. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics30: 055010.
19.
MastTD (2000) Empirical relationships between acoustic parameters in human soft tissues. Acoustics Research Letters Online1: 37–42.
20.
MerkensKPOlesonEM (2018) Comparison of High-Frequency Echolocation Clicks (Likely Kogia) in Two Simultaneously Collected Passive Acoustic Data Sets Sampled at 200 kHz and 320 kHz (National oceanic and atmospheric administration technical memorandum). Honolulu, HI: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
21.
MyerJHCookeF (1969) Optigami: a tool for optical system design. Applied Optics8: 260–260.
22.
OcheltreeKBFrizzelLA (1989) Sound field calculation for rectangular sources. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control36: 242–248.
23.
RossABDiederichCJNauWH, et al. (2005) Curvilinear transurethral ultrasound applicator for selective prostate thermal therapy. Medical Physics32: 1555–1565.
24.
SongKZhouXZangS, et al. (2017) Design of rigid-foldable doubly curved origami tessellations based on trapezoidal crease patterns. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences473: 20170016.
25.
StephensDNKruseDEQinS, et al. (2011) Design aspects of focal beams from high-intensity arrays. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control58: 1590–1602.
26.
TachiT (2009) Generalization of rigid-foldable quadrilateral mesh origami. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures50: 173–179.
27.
Ter HaarG (1999) Therapeutic ultrasound. European Journal of Ultrasound9: 3–9.
28.
VilkomersonDHRGardineerBHojeibaneH (1992) Quasi-omnidirectional transducers for ultrasonic electronic-beacon guidance of invasive devices. In: Proceeding of the SPIE 1733, new developments in ultrasonic transducers and transducer systems, San Diego, CA, US, 5 November 1992, pp. 154–165. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
29.
WanHVanBarenPEbbiniES, et al. (1996) Ultrasound surgery: comparison of strategies using phased array systems. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control43: 1085–1098.
WuXSherarM (2002) Theoretical evaluation of moderately focused spherical transducers and multi-focus acoustic lens/transducer systems for ultrasound thermal therapy. Physics in Medicine & Biology47: 1603–1621.
32.
ZirbelSALangRJThomsonMW, et al. (2013) Accommodating thickness in origami-based deployable arrays. Journal of Mechanical Design135: 111005.
33.
ZouCHarneRL (2017) Adaptive acoustic energy delivery to near and far fields using foldable, tessellated star transducers. Smart Materials and Structures26: 055021.
34.
ZouCHarneRL (2018) Piecewise assembled acoustic arrays based on reconfigurable tessellated structures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America144: 2324–2333.
