Planform,aero-structural and flight control optimization for tailless morphing aircraft

Abstract

Tailless swept wing airplanes rely on variations of the spanwise lift distribution to achieve controllability in all axes. As every flight condition requires different control moments, the conventional discrete control surfaces will be practically continuously deflected, leading to drag penalties. Shape adaptation base on chordwise morphing can achieve continuous deformations of the wing profile, leading to local lift variations with minimum drag penalties. As the shape is varied continuously along the wingspan, the lift distribution can be tailored to each flight condition. Tailless aircraft appear therefore as prime candidates for morphing, as the attainable benefits are potentially significant. This work presents a methodology to determine the optimal planform, profile shape, and morphing structure for a tailless aircraft. The employed morphing concept is based on a distributed compliance structure, actuated by piezoelectric elements. The multidisciplinary optimization considers the static and dynamic aeroelastic behavior of the structure and aims to maximize the aerodynamic efficiency of the plane while guaranteeing its controllability by means of morphing. The potential of the resulting wing design is fully exploited by means of a second optimization process, which identifies the actuation configuration resulting in the highest aerodynamic efficiency for a wide variety of control moments.

Keywords

Morphing wings tailless airplanes compliant structures piezoelectric actuators multidisciplinary optimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories (1988) AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing—second briefing to industry. Technical report, Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, Dayton, OH, October.

Anderson

(2001) Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. 3rd ed.McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math. Available at: http://uav.ust.hk/resource/FundamentalsofAerodynamicsChapter{_}1.pdf

Bisplinghoff

Ashley

Halfman

(1996) Aeroelasticity. Dover Publications.

Brandt

Stiles

Bertin

et al . (2004) Introduction to Aeronautics: A Design Perspective. 2nd ed.American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Available at: http://books.google.com/books?id=NJE3wTL6IDYC&pgis=1

Cleveland

(1981) LOWESS: a program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression. The American Statistician 35(1): 54. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2683591?origin=crossref

Cusher

Gopalarathnam

(2012) Drag reduction methodology for adaptive tailless aircraft. Journal of Aircraft 49(1): 161–172. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.C031454

Dick Kita (1989) Mechanical high-lift systems. In: Grumman Aerodynamics Lecture Series. Grumman Aerospace Corp.

Donlan

(1944) An interim report on the stability and control of tailless airplanes. Technical report no. 796. Langley Stability Research Division. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a801135.pdf

Drela

(2008) XFOIL. User Primer XFOIL 6.9. MIT Aero & Astro Harold Youngren, Aerocraft, Inc. Available at: http://web.mit.edu/aeroutil_v1.0/xfoil_doc.txt

10.

Drela

Giles

(1987) Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils. AIAA Journal 25(10): 1347–1355. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/3.9789

11.

Faber

Gunzburger

(1999) Centroidal Voronoi tessellations: applications and algorithms. SIAM Review 41(4): 637–676. Available at: http://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/S0036144599352836

12.

Filkovic

(2008) Graduate work. Technical report, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Zagreb. Available at: http://www.3dpanelmethod.com/documents/GraduateWork.pdf

13.

Gandhi

Anusonti-Inthra

(2008) Skin design studies for variable camber morphing airfoils. Smart Materials and Structures 17(1): 015025. Available at: http://stacks.iop.org/0964-1726/17/i=1/a=015025?key=crossref.3571389008db7975140a7e72f01c4021

14.

Gill

Murray

Wright

(1981) Practical Optimization. London: Academic Press.

15.

Hansen

(2013) The CMA evolution strategy. Available at: http://cma.gforge.inria.fr/cmaesintro.html

16.

Hansen

Ostermeier

(2001) Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation 9(2): 159–195.

17.

Harshberg

(1988) AFTI/F-111 mission performance. In: AFTI/F—111 Mission Adaptive Wing—Second Briefing to Industry. Dayton, OH: Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a202467.pdf

18.

Hasse

Zuest

Campanile

(2011) Modal synthesis of belt-rib structures. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 225: 722–732.

19.

Henry

Molinari

Arrieta

(2017) Smart morphing wing: optimization of distributed piezoelectric actuation. In: 25Th AIAA/AHS adaptive structures conference, January, pp. 1–12. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2017-0294

20.

Henry

Molinari

Arrieta

(2018) Distributed actuation optimization for the smart morphing wing. AIAA Journal.

21.

Hodges

Pierce

(2002) Introduction to Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511809170

22.

Igel

Hansen

Roth

(2007a) Covariance matrix adaptation for multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation 15(1): 1–28.

23.

Igel

Heidrich-Meisner

Glasmachers

(2008) Shark. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9: 993–996.

24.

Igel

Suttorp

Hansen

(2007b) Steady-state selection and efficient covariance matrix update in the multi-objective CMA-ES. In: Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 171–185. Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-70928-2_16

25.

Ippolito

Ghazaleh

ZHA

Lohn

et al . (2012) Integration and control of morphing wing structures for efficiency/performance. Technical report, Mountain View, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.

26.

Katz

Plotkin

(2001) Low-Speed Aerodynamics (Cambridge Aerospace Series). 2nd ed.New York: Cambridge University Press.

27.

Kota

Hetrick

Osborn

et al . (2003) Design and application of compliant mechanisms for morphing aircraft structures. Proceedings of SPIE 5054(734): 24–33. DOI: 10.1117/12.483869

28.

Kress

Winkler

(2010) Corrugated laminate homogenization model. Composite Structures 92(3): 795–810. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263822309003080

29.

Kroo

(1993) Tailless aircraft design —recent experiences. In: Symposium on Aerodynamics & Aeroacoustics (Advanced Series on Fluid Mechanics). Tucson, AZ: World Scientific, pp. 207–229.

30.

Kuhlman

(2003) On the wing. R/C Soaring Digest 20: 4–6. Available at: http://www.rcsoaring.com/rcsd/RCSD-2003-12.pdf

31.

Lyu

Martins

(2014) Aerodynamic shape optimization of an adaptive morphing trailing edge wing. In: 15th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June, pp. 1–27. AIAA. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2014-3275

32.

Molinari

Arrieta

Ermanni

(2014a) Aero-structural optimization of three-dimensional adaptive wings with embedded smart actuators. AIAA Journal 52(9): 1940–1951. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.J052715

33.

Molinari

Arrieta

Ermanni

(2015a) Numerical and experimental investigation of aero-structural characteristics and performance of distributed compliance morphing wings. In: 23rd AIAA/AHS adaptive structures conference, Kissimmee, FL, January, pp. 1–14. AIAA. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2015-0269

34.

Molinari

Arrieta

Ermanni

(2015b) Planform, aero-structural and flight control optimization for tailless morphing aircraft. In: SPIE smart structures/NDE, San Diego, CA, 8 March, vol. 9431, p. 94310Y. DOI: 10.1117/12.2179176.

35.

Molinari

Arrieta

Guillaume

et al . (2016) Aerostructural performance of distributed compliance morphing wings: wind tunnel and flight testing. AIAA Journal 54(12): 3859–3871. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.J055073

36.

Molinari

Quack

Arrieta

et al . (2014b) Design and realization of a compliant adaptable wing. In: 2014 conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems, Newport, RI, vol. 2, p. V002T04A010. ASME. Available at: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2022183

37.

Molinari

Quack

Arrieta

et al . (2015c) Design, realization and structural testing of a compliant adaptable wing. Smart Materials and Structures 24(10): 105027. Available at: http://stacks.iop.org/0964-1726/24/i=10/a=105027?key=crossref.c9d15441c1c11e76c99cbb886452f4c0

38.

Molinari

Quack

Dmitriev

et al . (2011) Aero-structural optimization of morphing airfoils for adaptive wings. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 22(10): 1075–1089. Available at: http://jim.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1045389X11414089

39.

Ohanian

Hickling

Stiltner

et al . (2012) Piezoelectric morphing versus servo-actuated MAV control surfaces. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Reston, VA, April, pp. 1–18. AIAA. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2012-1512

40.

Previtali

Arrieta

Ermanni

(2014) Performance of a three-dimensional morphing wing and comparison with a conventional wing. AIAA Journal 52(10): 2101–2113. Available at: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.J052764

41.

Previtali

Arrieta

Ermanni

(2015) Double-walled corrugated structure for bending-stiff anisotropic morphing skins. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 26(5): 599–613.

42.

Reem

(2011) The geometric stability of Voronoi diagrams with respect to small changes of the sites. In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on computational geometry, Paris, France, pp. 254–263. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.4125.

43.

Steers

(1988) MAW flight test overview. In: AFTI/F—111 Mission Adaptive Wing—Second Briefing to Industry. Dayton, OH: Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a202467.pdf

44.

Thill

Etches

Bond

et al . (2010) Composite corrugated structures for morphing wing skin applications. Smart Materials and Structures 19(12): 124009. Available at: http://stacks.iop.org/0964-1726/19/i=12/a=124009?key=crossref.087f4c4910b9e138b1473f11c777c349

45.

Torenbeek

(1982) Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-017-3202-4

46.

Voß

Hansen

Igel

(2010) Improved step size adaptation for the MO-CMA-ES. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, Portland, OR, pp. 487–494. ACM. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1830573

47.

Voronoi

(1908) Recherches sur les paralléloèdres primitifs. Journal Für Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik 136: 198–287.

48.

Xia

Bilgen

Friswell

(2014) The effect of corrugated skins on aerodynamic performance. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 25(7): 786–794. Available at: http://jim.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1045389X14521874