The design of an airfoil structure involves the disciplines of aerodynamics and structural mechanics, both of which are considered in the design methodology presented in this article. The approach described in this article starts from a requirement formulation based on a time-series of spanwise lift distributions on a morphing wing, representing the mission profile of the aircraft as a whole. This allows to specify goals based directly on aerodynamic performances instead of prescribing fixed geometrical shapes. Using the aero-structural analysis tool presented here, together with a parametrization representing the airfoil outer shape as well as its mechanical properties, allows the formulation of a combined aero-structural optimization problem. Promising aerodynamic and structural morphing performances have been obtained by applying the method to a morphing concept using Dielectric Elastomers (DEs) as actuators. Although the coupled physics are considered and a detailed material model has been used, results can be obtained within reasonable computational time by parallel evaluation of the candidate solutions. Improved aerodynamic performances have been obtained using this concurrent coupled method, in comparison to a sequential aerodynamic and structural optimization.
Barbarino, S., Dettmer, W.G. and Friswell, M.I.2010. ‘‘Morphing Trailing Edges with Shape Memory Alloy Rods,’’ In: 21st International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies (ICAST 2010), 4-6 October, Penn State, PA, USA, p. 17.
2.
Bartley-Cho, J., Wang, D.P. and West, M.N.2002. ‘‘Development, Control, and Test Results of High-rate, Hingeless Trailing Edge Control Surface for the Smart Wing Phase 2 Wind Tunnel Model,’’ In: Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, Proceedings of the SPIE, July, San Diego , Vol. 4698, pp. 53-63.
3.
Basney, J. and Livny, M.1999. ‘‘Deploying a High Throughput Computing Cluster,’’ In: Buyya, R. (ed.), High Performance Cluster Computing: Architectures and Systems, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, Vol. 1, pp. 154-185.
4.
Campanile, L.F.2005. ‘‘Initial Thoughts on Weight Penalty Effects in Shape-adaptable Systems,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 16:47-56.
5.
Campanile, L.F.2008. ‘‘Modal Synthesis of Flexible Mechanisms for Airfoil Shape Control,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 19:779-789.
6.
Campanile, L.F. and Anders, S.2005. ‘‘Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Amplification in Adaptive Belt-Rib Airfoils,’’ Aerospace Science and Technology, 9:55-63.
7.
Campanile, L.F. and Sachau, D.2000. ‘‘The Belt-rib Concept: A Structuronic Approach to Variable Camber,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 11:215-224.
8.
Canfield, S. and Frecker, M.2000. ‘‘Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanical Amplifiers for Piezoelectric Actuators,’’ Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 20:269-279.
9.
Coutu, D., Brailovsky, V. and Terriault, P.2010. ‘‘Optimized Design of an Active Extrados Structure for an Experimental Morphing Laminar Wing,’’ Aerospace Science and Technology, 14:451-458.
10.
Deperrois, A.2010. ‘‘XFLR5: A Tool for the Design of Airfoils, Wings and Planes Operating at Low Reynolds Numbers,’’Software Package.
11.
Di Lillo, L., Carnelli, D., Bergami, A., Busato, S. and Ermanni, P.2010. ‘‘Dielectric Materials for Variable Stiffness Skins in Shape Adaptation Applications,’’ In: 21st International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies (ICAST 2010), Penn State, PA, USA.
12.
Drela, M. and Giles, M.1987. ‘‘Viscous-inviscid Analysis of Transonic and Low Reynolds-number Airfoils,’’ AIAA Journal, 25:1347-1355.
Elzey, D., Sofa, A. and Wadey, H.2003. ‘‘A Bio-inspired, High-authority Actuator for Shape Morphing Structures,’’ In: Lagoudas, D. (ed.), Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Active Materials: Behavior and Mechanics, pp. 92-100.
15.
Gamboa, P., Vale, J., Lau, F.J.P. and Suleman, A.2009. ‘‘Optimization of a Morphing Wing Based on Coupled Aerodynamic and Structural Constraints,’’ AIAA Journal, 47:2087-2104.
16.
Georges, T., Brailovski, V., Morellon, E., Coutu, D. and Terriault, P.2009. ‘‘Design of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators for Morphing Laminar Wing with Flexible Extrados,’’Journal of Mechanical Design, 131:091006.
17.
Gorbet, R.B., Morris, K.A. and Chau, R.C.C.2009. ‘‘Mechanism of Bandwidth Improvement in Passively Cooled SMA Position Actuators,’’Smart Materials & Structures, 18:095013.
18.
Hansen, N. and Ostermeier, A.2001. ‘‘Completely Derandomized Self-adaptation in Evolution Strategies,’’ Evolutionary Computation , 9:159-195.
19.
Hansen, N., Müller, S.D. and Koumoutsakos, P.2003. ‘‘Reducing the Time Complexity of the Derandomized Evolution Strategy with Covariance Matrix Adaptation (CMA-ES), ’’ Evolutionary Computation, 11:1-18.
20.
Hasse, A., Zuest, I. and Campanile, L.F.2010. ‘‘Modal Synthesis of Belt-rib Structures, ’’ Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 224:1-11.
21.
Heyland, D., Rosemann, H. and Voss, D.2000. ‘‘The Adaptive Wing Project (DLR): Survey on Targets and Recent Results from Active/ adaptive Structures Viewpoint,’’ In: 10th International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies (ICAST ’99), 12 October, Nat. Res. Inf. Autom., Paris, France, pp. 178-185.
22.
Jacobs, E., Ward, K.E. and Pinkerton, R.M.1933. ‘‘The Characteristics of 78 Related Airfoil Sections from Tests in the Variable-Density Wind Tunnel,’’ Technical Report 460, NACA.
23.
Katz, J. and Plotkin, A.2001. Low-speed Aerodynamics, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.
24.
Kern, S., Müller, S.D., Hansen, N., Büche, D. and Ocenasek, J.2004. ‘‘Learning Probability Distributions in Continuous Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Review,’’ Natural Computing, 3:77-112.
25.
Kota, S., Osborn, R., Ervin, G. and Maric, D.2009. ‘‘Mission Adaptive Compliant Wing - Design, Fabrication and Flight Test’’, In: NATO RTO Applied Vehicle Technology Panel Symposium, Evora Portugal.
26.
Kota, S., Joo, J., Li, Z., Rodgers, S.M. and Sniegowski, J.2001. ‘‘Design of Compliant Mechanisms: Applications to Mems,’’ Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 29:7-15.
27.
Kudva, J.N.2004. ‘‘Overview of the DARPA Smart Wing Project ,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 15:261-267.
28.
Kudva, J.N., Sanders, B., Pinkerton-Florance, J. and Garcia, E.2002. ‘‘The DARPA/AFRL’NASA Smart Wing Program - Final Overview,’’ In: Smart Structures and Materials: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 4698, pp. 37-43.
29.
Lakes, R.1987. ‘‘Foam Structures with a Negative Poisson’s Ratio,’’ Science, 235:1038-1040.
30.
Lüchinger, M.2010. ‘‘Evaluation of a DE Material for the Application on a Model Airship with Fish-like Propulsion,’’ Bachelor Thesis, Centre of Structure Technologies, ETH Zurich, Jordi, C., Schmidt, A., Ermanni, P.
31.
Lu, K.J. and Kota, S.2003. ‘‘Design of Compliant Mechanisms for Morphing Structural Shapes,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 14:379-391.
32.
Martin, C.A., Hallam, B.J., Flaqnagan, J.S. and Bartley-Cho, J.2004. ‘‘Design, Fabrication, and Testing of a Scaled Wind Tunnel Model for the Smart Wing Project,’’Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 15:269-278.
33.
Monner, H.P., Sachau, D. and Breitbach, E.2001. ‘‘Design Aspects of the Elastic Trailing Edge for an Adaptive Wing’’, Technical Report, Defense Technical Information Center OAI-PMH Repository.
34.
Monner, H.2001. ‘‘Realization of an Optimized Wing Camber by Using Formvariable Flap Structures,’’ Aerospace Science and Technology, 5:445-455.
35.
Monner, H.P., Hanselka, H. and Breitbach, E.1998. ‘‘Development and Design of Flexible Fowler flaps for an Adaptive Wing,’’ In: Sater, J. (ed.), In: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, Proceedings of the SPIE, SPIE, 03 March, Vol. 3326, pp. 60-70.
36.
Monner, H., Sachau, D. and Breitbach, E.2000. ‘‘Realization of a Spanwise Differential and Constant Camber Variation for an Adaptive Wing,’’ In: 10th International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies (ICAST ’99), Inst. Nat. Res. Inf. Autom, Paris, France, pp. 186-193.
Osborn, R.F., Kota, S. and Hetrick, J.A.2004. ‘‘Active Flow Control Using High-frequency Compliant Structures’’ Journal of Aircraft, 41:603-609. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, 6-9 August, 2001, Montreal, Canada.
39.
Pagano, A., Ameduri, S., Cokonaj, V., Prachar, A., Zachariadis, Z. and Drikakis, D.2009. ‘‘Helicopter Blade Twist Control Through SMA Technology: Optimal Shape Prediction, Twist Actuator Realisation and Main Rotor Enhanced Performance Computation’’, In: 35th European Rotorcraft Forum, German Society for Aeronautics and Astronautics - Lilienthal-Oberth e.V (DGLR).
40.
Pelrine, R.E., Kornbluh, R.D. and Joseph, J.P.1998. ‘‘Electrostriction of Polymer Dielectrics with Compliant Electrodes as a Means of Actuation,’’ Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 64:77-85.
41.
Sobieczky, H.1998. ‘‘Parametric Airfoils and Wings,’’ In: Fuji, K. and Dulikravich, G.S. (eds), Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vieweg, Wiesbaden , pp. 71-88.
42.
Sofla, A.Y.N., Meguid, S.A., Tan, K.T. and Yeo, W.K.2010. ‘‘Shape Morphing of Aircraft Wing: Status and Challenges,’’ Materials & Design, 31:1284-1292.
43.
Strelec, J.K., Lagoudas, D.C., Khan, M.A. and Yen, J.2003. ‘‘Design and Implementation of a Shape Memory Alloy Actuated Reconfigurable Airfoil,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 14:257-273.
44.
Tadesse, Y., Thayer, N. and Priya, S.2010. ‘‘Tailoring the Response Time of Shape Memory Alloy Wires Through Active Cooling and Pre-stress,’’ Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 21:19-40.
45.
Vos, R., De Breuker, R., Barrett, R. and Tiso, P.2007. ‘‘Morphing Wing Flight Control via Postbuckled Precompressed Piezoelectric Actuators,’’ Journal of Aircraft, 44:1060-1068.
