Identification of location and magnitude of impact forces on a rectangular carbon fibre–epoxy honeycomb composite panel has been experimentally investigated through an inverse approach. The dynamic signals captured by a single piezoelectric (PZT) sensor installed on the panel remotely from the impact locations are utilized to identify the impact forces generated by an instrumented hammer. A number of potential impact locations on the panel are assumed to be known a priori. An actual impact is then occurred at one or two of these locations. The objective is to simultaneously identify the location and magnitude of the impact forces using the PZT sensor. The problem is solved through minimization of an extended matrix form of the convolution integral incorporating linear superposition of the responses due to impact at different locations. The under-determined problem is ill-posed and is regularized by Tikhonov and generalized cross validation methods. It is revealed that impact forces occurred at any location among four possible locations can be well identified.
AkhavanFWatkinsSEChandrashekharaK (2000) Prediction of impact contact forces of composite plates using fiber optic sensors and neural networks. Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures7: 195–205.
2.
AlamdariMMLiJSamaliB (2014) FRF-based damage localization method with noise suppression approach. Journal of Sound and Vibration333: 3305–3320.
3.
BeerFPJohnstonERJrMazurekDF. (1962) Vector Mechanics for Engineers. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
4.
ChoiKChangF-K (1996) Identification of impact force and location using distributed sensors. AIAA Journal34: 136–142.
5.
CoverleyPStaszewskiW (2003) Impact damage location in composite structures using optimized sensor triangulation procedure. Smart Materials and Structures12: 795–803.
6.
De StefanoMGherloneMMattoneM. (2015) Optimum sensor placement for impact location using trilateration. Strain51: 89–100.
7.
GiurgiutiuV (2003) Lamb wave generation with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. In: SPIE’s 10th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials. International society for optics and photonics, San Diego, CA, 2–6March, pp. 111–122. Bellingham, WA: SPIE. Available at: http://www.me.sc.edu/research/lamss/pdf/conferences/c83_spie03_5056-17_numbers.pdf
8.
GiurgiutiuV (2005) Tuned lamb wave excitation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures16: 291–305.
9.
GiurgiutiuVBaoJZhaoW (2001) Active sensor wave propagation health monitoring of beam and plate structures. In: SPIE’s 8th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials. International society for optics and photonics, Newport Beach, CA, 4–8March, pp. 234–245. Bellingham, WA: SPIE. Available at: http://www.me.sc.edu/research/lamss/pdf/conferences/c65__spie2001_4327-32.pdf
10.
GunawanFEHommaHKantoY (2006) Two-step B-splines regularization method for solving an ill-posed problem of impact-force reconstruction. Journal of Sound and Vibration297: 200–214.
11.
HansenPC (1994) Regularization tools: a Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems. Numerical Algorithms6: 1–35.
12.
HansenPC (1998) Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
13.
HuNFukunagaHMatsumotoS. (2007a) An efficient approach for identifying impact force using embedded piezoelectric sensors. International Journal of Impact Engineering34: 1258–1271.
14.
HuNMatsumotoSNishiR. (2007b) Identification of impact forces on composite structures using an inverse approach. Structural Engineering and Mechanics27: 409–424.
15.
IhnJ-BChangF-K (2008) Pitch-catch active sensing methods in structural health monitoring for aircraft structures. Structural Health Monitoring7: 5–19.
16.
InmanDJ (2001) Engineering Vibration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
InoueHHarriganJJReidSR (2001) Review of inverse analysis for indirect measurement of impact force. Applied Mechanics Reviews54: 503–524.
18.
JangBWLeeYGKimJH. (2012) Real-time impact identification algorithm for composite structures using fiber Bragg grating sensors. Structural Control and Health Monitoring19: 580–591.
19.
KalhoriHYeLLiZ. (2015) Identification of location and magnitude of impact force on a composite sandwich structure with lattice truss core. In: ASME 2015 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Houston, Texas, USA, 13–19November2015, pp. V001 T001A023. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
20.
KalhoriHYeLMustaphaS. (2014) Impact force reconstruction on a concrete deck using a deconvolution approach. In: 8th Australasian congress on applied mechanics: ACAM 8, Melbourne, VIC, 25–26November, pp. 763–771. Barton, ACT: Engineers Australia.
21.
KalhoriHYeLMustaphaS. (2016) Reconstruction and analysis of impact forces on a steel-beam-reinforced concrete deck. Experimental Mechanics.
22.
KunduTDasSJataKV (2007) Point of impact prediction in isotropic and anisotropic plates from the acoustic emission data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America122: 2057–2066.
23.
LiBYeLLiZ. (2015) Quantitative identification of delamination at different interfaces using guided wave signals in composite laminates. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites34: 1506–1525.
24.
LiljedahlCFitzpatrickMEdwardsL (2008) Residual stresses in structures reinforced with adhesively bonded straps designed to retard fatigue crack growth. Composite Structures86: 344–355.
25.
MaoYMGuoXLZhaoY (2010) Experimental study of hammer impact identification on a steel cantilever beam. Experimental Techniques34: 82–85.
26.
MustaphaSYeL (2014) Leaky and non-leaky behaviours of guided waves in CF/EP sandwich structures. Wave Motion51: 905–918.
27.
MustaphaSYeL (2015) Propagation behaviour of guided waves in tapered sandwich structures and debonding identification using time reversal. Wave Motion57: 154–170.
28.
MustaphaSYeLDongX. (2016) Evaluation of barely visible indentation damage (BVID) in CF/EP sandwich composites using guided wave signals. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing76: 497–517.
29.
MustaphaSYeLWangD. (2012) Debonding detection in composite sandwich structures based on guided waves. AIAA Journal50: 1697–1706.
30.
ParkJHaSChangF-K (2009) Monitoring impact events using a system-identification method. AIAA Journal47: 2011–2021.
31.
PeelameduSMNaganathanNGDukkipatiRV. (2005) Impact identification for a metallic plate using distributed smart materials. Smart Materials and Structures14: 449–456.
32.
QiaoBZhangXLuoX. (2015) A force identification method using cubic B-spline scaling functions. Journal of Sound and Vibration337: 28–44.
33.
SeydelRChangF-K (2001a) Impact identification of stiffened composite panels: I System development. Smart Materials and Structures10: 354–369.
34.
SeydelRChangF-K (2001b) Impact identification of stiffened composite panels: II Implementation studies. Smart Materials and Structures10: 370–379.
35.
StaszewskiWMahzanSTraynorR (2009) Health monitoring of aerospace composite structures – active and passive approach. Composites Science and Technology69: 1678–1685.
36.
ThieneMGalvanettoU (2015) Impact location in composite plates using proper orthogonal decomposition. Mechanics Research Communications64: 1–7.
37.
TracyMChangF-K (1998) Identifying impacts in composite plates with piezoelectric strain sensors, part I: theory. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures9: 920–928.
38.
TracyMJChangF-K (1996) Identifying impact load in composite plates based on distributed piezoelectric sensor measurements. In: Proceedings of the SPIE 2717, smart structures and materials 1996. International society for optics and photonics, San Diego, CA, 25 February, pp. 231–236.
39.
WordenKStaszewskiW (2000) Impact location and quantification on a composite panel using neural networks and a genetic algorithm. Strain36: 61–68.
