More attention has been paid to Damage detection in offshore jacket platforms (OJP) because of repair and maintenance issues. Damage detection using modal data from a few sensors is one of the main important subjects that researchers have paid attention to it. The inverse Vibration Problem (IVP) technique does not need modal data in all nodes of OJP but first modal data in different levels of platform and principal degrees of freedom could be sufficient. Since the complex structural model becomes a reduced shear building by implementing this technique, there must be a reduced equivalent stiffness matrix for the healthy structure to make the comparison for damage detection. This paper deals with the formulation and implementation of IVP technique in corporation of the proper method for calculation of equivalent level stiffness. The proper method was selected based on a comparison of modal data obtained from full and reduced models using comparison tools like the MAC coefficient. Also, damage detection in a typical OJP model under a specific damage scenario was investigated numerically and experimentally and the results show the reliable performance of the methodology. A damage detection flowchart is suggested to detect damage location properly. It is developed mainly based on geometrical couplings in OJP structure in damaged conditions and the method leads to damage location exactly and maximum error in damage prediction is obtained at about 12%.
RytterA.Vibrational based inspection of civil engineering structures. PhD Dissertation, Alborg University, Denmark, 1993.
2.
Yuan-shengCZhenW.Detecting damage to offshore platform structures using the time-domain data. J Mar Sci Appl2008; 7: 7–14.
3.
ElshafeyAAHaddaraMRMarzoukH.Damage detection in offshore structures using neural networks. Mar Struct2010; 23: 131–145.
4.
AsgarianBAghaeidoostVShokrgozarHR.Damage detection of jacket type offshore platforms using rate of signal energy using wavelet packet transform. Mar Struct2016; 45: 1–21.
5.
AsgarianBShokrgozarHRShahcheragiD, et al. Effect of soil pile structure interaction on dynamic characteristics of jacket type offshore platforms. Coupled Syst Mech2012; 1(4): 381–395.
6.
MajumderLManoharCS.A time domain approach for damage detection in beam structures using vibration data with a moving oscillator as an excitation source. J Sound Vib2003; 268(4): 699–716.
7.
SeyedpoorSMAhmadiAPahnabiN.Structural damage detection using time domain responses and an optimization method. Inverse Probl Sci Eng2019; 27(5): 669–688.
8.
FallahianSJoghataieAKazemiMT.Structural damage detection using time domain responses and teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm. Sci Iran2018; 25(6): 3088–3100.
9.
ShayanfarMAKavehAEghlidosO, et al. Damage detection of bridge structures in time domain via enhanced colliding bodies optimization. Int J Optim Civ Eng2016; 6(2): 211–226.
DasSSahaPPatroSK.Vibration-based damage detection techniques used for health monitoring of structures: a review. J Civ Struct Health Monit2016; 6: 477–507.
13.
PanigrahiSKChakravertySMishraBK.Vibration based damage detection in a uniform strength beam using genetic algorithm. Meccanica2009; 44: 697–710.
14.
AcviOAbdeljaberOKiranyazS, et al. A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: from traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 147: 107077.
15.
AltunisikACOkurFYKaracaS, et al. Vibration-based damage detection in beam structures with multiple cracks: modal curvature vs. modal flexibility methods. Nondestr Test Eval2019; 34(1): 33–53.
16.
BagchiAHumarJNomanA.Development of a finite element system for vibration based damage development of a finite element system for vibration based damage identification in structures. J Appl Sci2007; 7(17): 2404–2413.
17.
JeenkourPPattavanitchJBoonlongK.Vibration-based damage detection in beams by genetic algorithm encoding locations and damage factors as decision variables. Vibroeng Procedia2017; 16: 35–40.
18.
IsmailAZubaydiAPiscesaB, et al. Vibration-based damage identification for ship sandwich plate using finite element method. Open Eng2020; 10(1): 744–752.
19.
MalekzehtabHGolafshaniAA.Damage detection in an offshore jacket platform using genetic algorithm based finite element model updating with noisy modal data. Procedia Eng2013; 54: 480–490.
20.
ChakravertySSahooDM.Structural parameters identification of uncertain multi-storey shear buildings using fuzzy neural network modelling. Inverse Probl Sci Eng2017; 25(3): 434–452.
MohammadiRKMirtaheriMSalkhordehM, et al. A cost-effective neural network–based damage detection procedure for cylindrical equipment. Adv Mech Eng2019; 11(7): 1–10.
23.
LeeJJYunCB.Damage localization for bridges using probabilistic neural networks. KSCE J Civ Eng2007; 11: 111–120.
24.
SidartaDEO’SullivanJLimHJ. Damage detection of offshore platform mooring line using artificial neural network. In: ASME 2018 37th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, Madrid, Spain, 17–22 June 2018.
25.
NguyenCUHuynhTCKimJT.Vibration-based damage detection in wind turbine towers using artificial neural networks. Struct Monit Maint2018; 5(4): 507–519.
26.
YanWJKatafygiotisLS.A novel Bayesian approach for structural model updating utilizing statistical modal information from multiple setups. Struct Saf2015; 52: 260–271.
27.
BehmaneshIMoaveniB.Probabilistic identification of simulated damage on the Dowling Hall footbridge through Bayesian finite element model updating. Struct Control Health Monit2015; 22: 463–483.
28.
ZhangWLiuJChoC, et al. A fast Bayesian approach using adaptive densifying approximation technique accelerated MCMC. Inverse Probl Sci Eng2016; 24(2): 247–264.
29.
SunHMordretAPrietoGA, et al. Bayesian characterization of buildings using seismic interferometry on ambient vibrations. Mech Syst Signal Process2017; 85: 468–486.
30.
TabeshpourMR.Iterative method for frequency updating of simple vibrating system. J Vibroeng2012; 14(3): 1370–1377.
31.
BarbieriNBarbieriRSilvaHAT. A methodology for identification of damage in beams. Inverse Probl Sci Eng2016; 24(3): 482–503.
32.
LotfollahiYMAShahverdiSTarinejadR, et al. Structural health monitoring (SHM) of offshore jacket platforms. In: 30th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE 2011), Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 19–24 June 2011.
33.
WangSLiuFZhangM.Modal strain energy based structural damage localization for offshore platform using simulated and measured data. J Ocean Univ China2014; 13(3): 397–406.
34.
GillichGRFurduiHWahabMA, et al. A robust damage detection method based on multi-modal analysis in variable temperature conditions. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 115: 361–379.
35.
LiuKYanRJSoaresCG.Damage identification in offshore jacket structures based on modal flexibility. Ocean Eng2018; 170: 171–185.
36.
LiHYangHHuSLJ. Modal strain energy decomposition method for damage localization in 3D frame structures. J Eng Mech2006; 132(9): 941–951.
37.
PerezJERRodriguezRVazquezAO.Damage detection in offshore jacket platforms with limited modal information using the damage submatrices method. Mar Struct2017; 55: 78–103.
38.
HosseinzadehAZAmiriGGRazzaghiSAS. Model-based identification of damage from sparse sensor measurements using Neumann series expansion. Inverse Probl Sci Eng2017; 25(2): 239–259.
39.
WeiZTLiuJKLuZR.Damage identification in plates based on the ratio of modal strain energy change and sensitivity analysis. Inverse Probl Sci Eng2016; 24(2): 265–283.
40.
ArangioSBontempiF.Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge with Bayesian neural networks. Struct Infrastruct Eng2015; 11(4): 575–587.
41.
GladwellGML. The inverse problem for the vibrating beam. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci1984; 393: 277–295.
42.
GladwellGML. Inverse problems in vibration. Dordrecht: Springer, 1986.
43.
GladwellGMLGbadeyanJA. On the inverse problem of the vibrating string or rod. Q J Mech Appl Math1985; 38(1): 169–174.
44.
TakewakiI.Hybrid inverse Eigenmode problem for a shear building supporting a finite element subassemblage. J Vib Control1998; 4(4): 347–360.
45.
LinCC.Parametric identification of asymmetric buildings from earthquake response records. Smart Mater Struct2005; 14: 850.
46.
DolatshahiKMRofooeiFR.Inverse vibration problem for un-damped 3-dimensional multi-story shear building models. J Sound Vib2014; 33: 99–113.
47.
HaeriMHLotfiADolatshahiKM, et al. Inverse vibration technique for structural health monitoring of offshore jacket platforms. Appl Ocean Res2017; 62: 181–198.
48.
HosseinlouFMojtahediA.Developing a robust simplified method for structural integrity monitoring of offshore jacket-type platform using recorded dynamic responses. Appl Ocean Res2016; 56(2): 107–118.
49.
HosseinlouFMojtahediAYaghinMAL. Developing a SIM strategy for offshore jacket platforms based on the FE model updating and a novel simplified method. Ocean Eng2017; 145: 158–176.
ChopraAK.Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2006.
52.
TabeshpourMRNoorifardA.Comparing calculation methods of storey stiffness to control provision of soft storey in seismic codes. Earthq Struct2016; 11: 1–23.
53.
TabeshpourMRAhmadiA.Sensitivity analysis of simple methods in determination of offshore jacket structures levels stiffness. J Mar Sci Technol2022; 27: 619–636.
54.
MojtahediALotfollahi YaghinMAHassanzadehY, et al. Developing a robust SHM method for offshore jacket platform using model updating and fuzzy logic system. Appl Ocean Res2011; 33: 398–411.
55.
EsfandiariA.An innovative sensitivity-based method for structural model updating using incomplete modal data. Struct Control Health Monit2017; 24: e1905.
