Cracks are common defects in aluminum plate-like components that are in widespread use in aerospace, shipbuilding, and other industries. Ultrasonic detection using Lamb waves has proven to be an efficient method for crack detection and localization. However, quantitative information regarding crack size or orientation is of paramount importance for damage diagnosis and life prediction. In this article, employing a sparsely arranged piezoelectric sensor array, a quantitative crack detection and imaging approach using a Lamb wave–focusing array algorithm is developed and presented. Additionally, Lamb wave propagation on thin-wall plates and wave interaction with crack damage was studied using three-dimensional elastodynamic finite integration technique. The focusing array imaging algorithm was then developed and applied to both simulation and experimental data to generate intensity images of the structure under interrogation. Experimentally, wafer-type piezoelectric actuators/sensors are permanently installed on the testing structure to generate Lamb waves as well as to measure the waves propagating through the structures. Our results show that when applied to either experimental or simulated data, the focusing array algorithms yield images containing quantitative damage information. The results also demonstrate that three-dimensional elastodynamic finite integration technique can be used for future simulation-based investigations of sensing optimization for various damage scenarios.
AlleyneDNCawleyP (1992a) Optimization of Lamb wave inspection techniques. NDT & E International25(1): 11–22.
2.
AlleyneDNCawleyP (1992b) The interaction of Lamb waves with defects. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectronics, and Frequency Control39: 381–397.
3.
AnnAKKimHMJhangKY. (2004) Detection of laser excited lamb wave using air coupled transducer and wave mode identification using wavelet transform. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. 760: 1018–1025.
4.
AntonSRParkGFarrarCR. (2007) On piezoelectric Lamb wave-based structural health monitoring using instantaneous baseline measurements. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2007, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological System. Ed. KunduTribikram, pp. 65320B.
5.
BinghamJHindersM (2010) 3D Elastodynamic finite integration technique simulation of guided waves in extended built-up structures containing flaws. Journal of Computational Acoustics18(2): 1–28.
6.
CrawleyEFDe LuisJ (1987) Use of piezoelectric actuators as elements of intelligent structures. AIAA Journal25(10): 1373–1385.
7.
CroxfordAJMollJWilcoxPD. (2010) Efficient temperature compensation strategies for guided wave structural health monitoring. Ultrasonics50: 517–528.
8.
DaltonRPCawleyPLoweMJS (2001) The potential of guided waves for monitoring large areas of metallic aircraft fuselage structure. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation20(1): 29–46.
9.
Di ScaleaFLMattHBartoliI (2007) The response of rectangular piezoelectric sensors to Rayleigh and Lamb ultrasonic waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America121(1): 175–187.
10.
DupontMOsmontRGouyonR. (2000) Permanent monitoring of damage impacts by a piezoelectric sensor based integrated system. Technomic CRC press, Structural Health Monitoring2000: 561–570.
11.
FellingerFLangenbergK (1990) Numerical techniques for elastic wave propagation and scattering. In: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Elastic Wave Propagation and Ultrasonic Evaluation. Boulder, CO, July 30-August 3, 1989. Amsterdam and New York, North-Holland, pp. 81–86.
12.
FellingerPMarkleinRLangenbergK. (1995) Numerical modeling of elastic wave propagation and scattering with EFIT—elastodynamic finite integration technique. Wave Motion21: 47–66.
13.
Garcia-HernanadezMJChavezJAYanezY. (2004) Ultrasonic Lamb wave NDE system using an air coupled concave array transducer. In: IEEE ultrasonics symposium, 2004 IEEE international ultrasonics, ferroelectronics, and frequency control joint 50th anniversary conference, Montreal, Canada, 23–27 August.
14.
GiurgiutiuV (2005) Tuned Lamb-wave excitation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures16(4): 291–306.
15.
GiurgiutiuV (2008) Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors. Academic Press, Oxford, UK, 747 pp.
16.
GiurgiutiuVYuLKendallJ. (2007) In situ imaging of crack growth with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. AIAA Journal45(11): 2758–2769.
17.
GlushkovEGlushkovaNLammeringR. (2011) Lamb wave excitation and propagation in elastic plates with surface obstacles: proper choice of central frequency. Smart Materials & Structures20(1): 1–11.
18.
HarleyJBYingYMouraJMF. (2012) Application of Mellin transform features for robust ultrasonic guided wave structural health monitoring. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation31: 1551–1558.
19.
IhnJBChangFK (2008) Pitch-catch active sensing methods in structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring7(1): 5–19.
20.
LeckeyCRoggeMMillerC. (2012) Multiple-mode lamb wave scattering simulations using 3D elastodynamic finite integration technique. Ultrasonics52: 193–207.
21.
LinXYuanFG (2001) Diagnostic Lamb waves in an integrated piezoelectric sensor/actuator plate—analytical and experimental studies. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit, Seattle, WA, 16–19 April,(10): 907–913, paper no. AIAA-2001-1245.
22.
LindgrenEABuynakCFKnoppJS. (2012) Demonstration study for reliability assessment of SHM systems incorporating model-assisted probability of detection approach. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation31: 1543–1550.
23.
LuYYeLSuZ (2006) Crack identification in aluminum plates using Lamb wave signals of a PZT sensor network. Smart Materials & Structures15: 839–849.
24.
MarkleinR (2002) The finite integration technique as a general tool to compute acoustic, electromagnetic, elastodynamic, and coupled wave fields. In: StoneW (ed.) Review of Radio Science: 1999-2002, URSI. New York: IEEE Press and John Wiley & Sons, pp. 201–244.
25.
MichaelsTEMichaelsJEMiB. (2005) Damage detection in plate structures using sparse ultrasonic transducer arrays and acoustic wavefield imaging. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation24: 938–945.
26.
MurayamaRMizutaniK (2002) Conventional electromagnetic acoustic transducers development for optimum Lamb wave modes. Ultrasonics40(1): 491–495.
27.
OngWHChiuWK (2012) Redirecting of Lamb waves for structural health monitoring. Smart Materials Research2012: 9 pages. Article ID718686
28.
PurekarASPinesDJSundararamanS. (2004) Directional piezoelectric phased array filters for detecting damage in isotropic plates. Smart Materials & Structures13: 838–850.
29.
RaghavanACesnikCES (2004) Modeling of piezoelectric-based Lamb wave generation and sensing for structural health monitoring. Proceedings of SPIE5391: 419–430.
30.
RajagopalanJBalasubramaniamKKrishnamurthyCV (2006) A single transmitter multi-receiver (STMR) PZT array for guided ultrasonic wave based structural health monitoring of large isotropic plate structures. Smart Materials & Structures15: 1190–1196.
31.
RoseJL (1998) A comb transducer model for guided wave NDE. Ultrasonics36: 163–169.
32.
RoseJL (1999) Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
SantoniGBYuLXuB. (2007) Lamb wave mode tuning of piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics: Transactions of the ASME129(6): 752–762.
34.
SchubertFKoehlerB (2004) Numerical time-domain simulation of diffusive ultrasound in concrete. Ultrasonics42: 781–786.Stazewski WJ, Lee BC and Traynor R (2007) Fatigue crack detection in metallic structures with Lamb waves and 3D laser vibrometry. Measurement Science & Technology 18: 727–739.
35.
SchubertFPeifferAKohlerB. (1998) The elastodynamic finite integration technique for waves in cylindrical geometries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America104: 2604–2614.
36.
SuZYeLLuY (2006) Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: a review. Journal of Sound and Vibration295: 753–780.
37.
TsengKKHSohCKNaiduASK (2001) Non-parametric damage detection and characterization using smart piezoceramic material. Smart Material & Structures11(3): 317–329.
38.
TuaPSQuekSTWangQ (2004) Detection of cracks in plates using piezo-actuated Lamb waves. Smart Materials & Structures13(4): 643–660.
39.
WangCHRoseJTChangFK (2004) A synthetic time-reversal imaging method for structural health monitoring. Smart Materials & Structures13: 415–423.
40.
WangXLuYTangJ (2008) Damage detection using piezoelectric transducers and the Lamb wave approach: I. System analysis. Smart Materials & Structures17(2): 1–5.
41.
WilcoxPLoweMCawleyP (2005) Omnidirectional guided wave inspection of large metallic plate structures using an EMAT array. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control52(4): 653–665.
42.
WilcoxPD (2003) Omni-directional guided wave transducer arrays for the rapid inspection of large areas of plate structures. IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control50(6): 699–709.
43.
WorltonDC (1957) Ultrasonic testing with Lamb waves. Nondestructive Testing15: 218–222.
44.
XuBGiurgiutiuV (2007) Single mode tuning effects on lamb wave time reversal with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 26(2–4): 123–134.
45.
YuLGiurgiutiuV (2007) In-situ optimized PWAS phased arrays for Lamb wave structural health monitoring. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures2(3): 459–488.
46.
YuLGiurgiutiuV (2008) In situ 2-D piezoelectric wafer active sensors arrays for guides wave damage detection. Ultrasonics48(2): 117–134.
47.
YuLGiurgiutiuV (2009) Piezoelectric wafer active sensors. In: BollerCChangFkFujinoY. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 3, Part 5: Sensors. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK, pp. 1013–1027.
48.
YuLGiurgiutiuV (2010) Piezoelectric wafer active sensor guided wave imaging. In: SPIE conference on sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems, San Diego, CA, 7–11 March, SPIEvol. 7648, paper no.7648-31.
49.
YuLBottai-SantoniGGiurgiutiuV (2010) Shear lag solution for tuning ultrasonic piezoelectric wafer active sensors with applications to lamb wave array imaging. International Journal of Engineering Science48(10): 848–861.
