This paper examines how generative knowing theory reimagines adult education, highlighting a vital interdependence where differences are not erased but valued. First, two vignettes explore the complex challenges of an aging society and underrecognized attempts to marginalize older adults. Calling for adult educators to stop (re)producing systemic inequalities, this paper critiques the dominant neoliberal, solution-oriented frameworks that oversimplify our complex entanglements and explores how generative knowing could reimagine adult education/learning. The last vignette exemplifies how educators can create generative spaces within the components of generative knowing, particularly in intergenerational learning. Recognizing differences as a generative force transforms the role of adult education, motivating educators and learners to move beyond their comfort zones, embrace complexity, and collaborate on meaningful responses to an already entangled reality. Embracing vital interdependence is significant for adult education to support societal progress, especially amid demographic shifts and the polarized discourse prevalent in today’s society.
ArcherL. (2007). Diversity, equality and higher education: A critical reflection on the ab/uses of equity discourse within widening participation. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5-6), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701595325
3.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
4.
BarnettR. (2020). Leading with meaning: Why diversity, equity, and inclusion matters in US higher education. Perspectives in Education, 38(2), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v38.i2.02
de OliveiraV. M. (2021). Hospicing modernity: Facing humanity's wrongs and the implications for social activism. North Atlantic Books.
12.
FuentesM. A.ZelayaD. G.MadsenJ. W. (2021). Rethinking the course syllabus: Considerations for promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion. Teaching of Psychology, 48(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959979
13.
GoodwinC. M.McKendreeR. B. (2024). Diversity, equity, and inclusion in natural science education: A review of literature. Natural Sciences Education, 53(1), Article e20142. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20142
14.
IversonS. V. (2007). Camouflaging power and privilege: A critical race analysis of university diversity policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 586–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07307794
15.
IyerA. (2022). Understanding advantaged groups’ opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies: The role of perceived threat. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(5), Article e12666. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12666
16.
LittlerJ. (2013). Meritocracy as plutocracy: The marketising of ‘equality’ under neoliberalism. New Formations, 80(80), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF.80/81.03.2013
NicolaidesA. (2022). Generative knowing: Principles, methods, and dispositions of an emerging adult learning theory. Myers Education Press.
20.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2015). Intergenerational resource tensions in the workplace and beyond: Individual, interpersonal, institutional, international. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.10.003
SahaS.GuitonG.WimmersP. F.WilkersonL. (2008). Student body racial and ethnic composition and diversity-related outcomes in US medical schools. JAMA, 300(10), 1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.10.1135
23.
SánchezM.KaplanM. (2014). Intergenerational learning in higher education: Making the case for multigenerational classrooms. Educational Gerontology, 40(7), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.844039
TalibN.FitzgeraldR. (2015). Inequality as meritocracy: The use of the metaphor of diversity and the value of inequality within Singapore's meritocratic education system. Critical Discourse Studies, 12(4), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1034740
WhitehouseP.GeorgeD. (2018). From intergenerational to intergenerative: Towards the futures of intergenerational learning and health. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 16(1-2), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2018.1404862
28.
YorksL.NicolaidesA. (2013). Toward an integral approach for evolving mindsets for generative learning and timely action in the midst of ambiguity. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115(8), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500808
29.
ZambranaR. E.RayR.EspinoM. M.CastroC.Douthirt CohenB.EliasonJ. (2015). “Don’t Leave Us Behind”: The importance of mentoring for underrepresented minority faculty. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 40–72. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214563063
