What is the nature of an adult student identity? Based in social constructivist theory, this study explored coconstructed understandings of culturally and socially mediated student identities through a select group of adult undergraduates in intergenerational community college classroom contexts. Key findings elaborated the coconstruction of two interwoven dimensions— positional and relational adult student identities reflecting multilayered, multisourced, and, at times, paradoxical beliefs and understandings of self, position, and relationships. Key elements and dynamics of these positional and relational identities for adult students are presented, including unique findings of a belief in an ideal student image as a referent to one’s actions and beliefs as well as using a referent of the younger college students’ attitudes and behaviors for salient judgments of position and relational status.
Apps, J. W. (1981). The adult learner on campus: A guide for instructors and administrators. Chicago: Follett.
2.
Aslanian, C. (2001). Adult students today. New York: College Board.
3.
Bishop-Clark, C., & Lynch, J. (1992). The mixed-age classroom. College Teaching, 12, 114-117.
4.
Bishop-Clark, C.,& Lynch, J. (1998). Comparing teacher and student response to the mixed-age college classroom. Community College Review, 25(4), 21-34.
5.
Boyer, E. L. (1974). Breaking up the youth ghetto. In D. Vermilye (Ed.), Lifelong learners: A new clientele for higher education(pp. 4-11). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Chism, N. V., Cano, J., & Pruitt, A. S. (1989). Teaching in a diverse environment: Knowledge and skills needed by TAs. In J. D. Nyquist, R. D. Abbott, & D. H. Wolff (Eds.), Teaching assistant training in the 1990s. Newdirections for teaching and learning, no. 39(pp. 22-36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Cohen, R. (1998). Class consciousness and its consequences: The impact of an elite education on mature, working-class women. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 353-375.
8.
Dannefer, D. (1984a). Adult development and social theory: A paradigmatic reappraisal. American Sociological Review, 49(1), 100-116.
9.
Dannefer, D. (1984b). The role of the social in life-span developmental psychology, past and future. American Sociological Review, 49(6), 847-850.
10.
Darkenwald, G. G., & Novak, R. J. (1997). Classroom age composition and academic achievement in college. Adult Education Quarterly, 47, 108-116.
11.
Donaldson, J. F., & Graham, S. (1999). A model of college outcomes for adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 50, 24-40.
12.
Donaldson, J. F., Graham, S., Kasworm, C.,& Dirkx, J. (1999, April). Adult undergraduates’participation and involvement: Future directions for theory and research. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
13.
Faust, D. F., & Courtenay, B. C. (2002). Interaction in the intergenerational freshman class: What matters. Educational Gerontology, 28, 401-422.
14.
Fredericksen, N.,& Schrader, W. (1951). Adjustment to college. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
15.
Grossberg, L. (1994). Introduction. In H. Giroux& P. McLaren (Eds.), Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies(pp. 1-25). New York: Routledge.
16.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Jacobs, N. (1989). Nontraditional students: The new ecology of the classroom. Educational Forum, 53, 330-336.
18.
Johnson-Bailey, J., & Cervero, R. M. (1996). An analysis of the educational narratives of reentry Black women. Adult Education Quarterly, 46, 142-157.
19.
Kasworm, C. (1990). Adult undergraduates in higher education: A review of past research perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 345-372.
20.
Kasworm, C. (2002). African American adult undergraduates: Differing cultural realities. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 50(1), 10-29.
21.
Kasworm, C. (2003a). Adult meaning making in the undergraduate classroom. Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 81-98.
22.
Kasworm, C. (2003b, April). What is collegiate involvement for adult undergraduates. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED481228)
23.
Kasworm, C., & Blowers, S. (1994). Adult undergraduate students: Patterns of learning involvement. Knoxville: College of Education, University of Tennessee. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED376321)
24.
Kasworm, C.,& Pike, G. R. (1994). Adult undergraduate students: Evaluating the appropriateness of traditional model of academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 689-710.
25.
Kasworm, C., Polson, C., & Fishback, S. (2002). Responding to adult learners in higher education. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
26.
Kasworm, C., Sandmann, L., & Sissel, P. (2000). Adult learners in higher education. In A. L. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education(pp. 449-463). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Kaufman, P.,& Feldman, K. A. (2004). Forming identities in college: Asociological approach. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 463-496.
28.
Lave, J.,& Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
LeCompte, M., & Preissle, J. G. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.
30.
Long, H. B. (1983). Academic performance, attitudes, and social relations in intergenerational college classes. Educational Gerontology, 9, 471-481.
31.
Lynch, J.,& Bishop-Clark, C. (1993). Traditional and nontraditional student attitudes towards the mixed age college classroom. Innovative Higher Education, 18(2), 109-121.
32.
Lynch, J., & Bishop-Clark, C. (1994). The influence of age in college classrooms: Some new evidence. Community College Review, 22(3), 3-10.
33.
Matus-Grossman, L., & Gooden, S. (2002). Opening doors: Students’ perspectives on juggling work, family, and college. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 471815)
34.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Mishler, C.,& Davenport, M. (1984). Faculty and student attitudes towards the mixed-age college class. Green Bay: University of Wisconsin—Green Bay Assessment Center. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED250988)
36.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Enrollment in postsecondary institutions, fall 2001 and financial statistics, fiscal year 2001, NCES 2004-155.Retrieved August 4, 2004, from www.nces.ed.gopv/pubs2004/2004155.pdf
37.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. T. (1998). Studying college students in the 21st century: Meeting new challenges. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 151-165.
38.
Ross-Gordon, J., & Brown-Haywood, F. (2000). Keys to college success as seen through the eyes of African American adult students. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 48(3), 14-23.
39.
Shaw, K. (1999). Defining the self: Constructions of identity in community college students. In K. Shaw, J. Valadez, & R. Rhoads (Eds.), Community colleges as cultural texts(pp. 153-172). Albany: State University of New York Press.
40.
Stage, F. K.,& McCafferty, P. T. (1992). Nontraditional and traditional students in the college mathematics classroom. NASPA Journal, 29(2), 101-106.
41.
Tindell, R., & McCarter, R. (1980). The older college student as viewed by younger peers. Educational Gerontology, 5, 293-299.
42.
Valadez, J. (1993). Cultural capital and its impact on the aspirations of nontraditional community college students. Community College Review, 21(3), 30-44.
43.
Weis, L. (1985). Between two worlds: Black students in an urban community college. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
44.
Wilkie, C. J., & Thompson, C. A. (1993). First-year reentry women’s perceptions of their classroom experiences. Journal of Freshman Year Experience, 5(2), 69-89.
