Numeracy Education for Adult Learners: A Scan of the Field and Principles for Course and Materials Design

Abstract

Additional research is needed to improve adult numeracy instruction, training for instructors, and our understanding of the feasibility and impact of innovations in these areas. The Adult Numeracy in the Digital Era (ANDE) project, funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) at the U.S. Department of Education, seeks to develop and test an innovative, technology-enabled approach for improving adult numeracy and digital literacy instruction. We began this project guided by principles of user-centered design, specifically the principle of knowing the user’s wants and needs. We conducted a “field scan” of adult numeracy and digital literacy, by interviewing researchers, instructors, students; conducting classroom observations; and reviewing literature. We detail our key findings within two emergent themes: (1) extensive variability in learner backgrounds and readiness, instructors’ experiences, standards alignment, course structures, and classroom contexts; and (2) diversity of learner goals and the actions they and their instructors took as they worked together within the course and local policy contexts. We also identify three design principles to guide course development, suggesting that adult numeracy courses should be: aligned and relevant; interactive and participatory; and relationship-centered. These principles guided the design of our adult numeracy course, and we offer questions that current instructors can consider as they design their own adult numeracy lessons.

Keywords

adult education adult training numeracy mathematics curriculum design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Batalova

Fix

(2015). Through an immigrant lens: PIAAC assessment of the competencies of adults in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/PIAAC-Immigrant-Adult-Profile.pdf

Belzer

(2007). Toward defining and improving quality in adult basic education: Issues and challenges. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Belzer

Leon

Patterson

Rhodes

Salas-Isnardi

Vanek

Webb

Willson-Toso

(2020). COVID-19 rapid response report from the field. ProLiteracy. https://www.literacynewyork.org/documents/Covid-19/COVID-19-Report.pdf

Belzer

Leon

Patterson

Salas-Isnardi

Vanek

Webb

(2022). From rapid emergency response to scaling and sustaining innovation: Adult foundational edu- cation in the time of COVID-19. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2022(173–174), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20454

Comings

(2007). Persistence: Helping adult students reach their goals. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 7(2), 23–46.

Constantakis

(2017). Integrating digital tools for adult learners: Four critical factors. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.org/2017/06/27/integrating-digital-tools-adult-learners-four-critical-factors/

Daffron

S. R.

Caffarella

R. S.

(2021). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Durgunoglu

A. Y.

Sagar

Fagan

K. E.

Brueck

(2021). Improving the comprehension and vocabulary skills of English language learners with content integrated language instruction for adults. Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy, 3(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.35847/AYucesan.ASagar.KFagan.ABrueck.3.1.34

Evans

Yasukawa

Mallows

Kubascikova

(2021). Shifting the gaze: From the numerate individual to their numerate environment. Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy, 3(3), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.35847/JEvans.KYasukawa.DMallows.JKubascikova.3.3.4

10.

Gal

Grotlüschen

Tout

Kaiser

(2020). Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: A critical view of a neglected field. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 52, 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01155-9.

11.

Geiger

Goos

Forgasz

(2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1.

12.

Ginsburg

(2016). Novice teachers reflect on their instructional practices while teaching adults math. Adults Learning Mathematics: International Journal, 11(2), 7–13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1123376.pdf

13.

Ginsburg

(2017). What’s an adult numeracy teacher to teach? Negotiating the complexity of adult numeracy instruction. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 6(1), 57–61. https://hgs864.p3cdn1.secureserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2017SpringCOABEJournal.pdf

14.

Grotlüschen

Buddeberg

Redmer

Ansen

Dannath

(2019). Vulnerable subgroups and numeracy practices: How poverty, debt, and unemployment relate to everyday numeracy practices. Adult Education Quarterly, 69(4), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713619841132

15.

Hannula

M. S.

Leder

G. C.

Morselli

Vollstedt

Zhang

(Eds.) (2019). Affect and mathematics education: Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity ICME-13 Monographs. Springer.

16.

Jameson

M. M.

Fusco

B. R.

(2014). Math anxiety, math self-concept, and math self-efficacy in adult learn- ers compared to traditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 64(4), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713614541461

17.

Knowles

M. S.

(1988). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. The Adult Education Company.

18.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

19.

Merriam

S. B.

Caffarella

R. S.

Baumgartner

L. M.

(2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). Wiley.

20.

Moll

L. C.

Amanti

Neff

Gonzalez

(1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534.

21.

Murray

Negoescu

(2019). Upskilling new Americans: Innovative English training for career advancement. National Immigration Forum. https://immigrationforum.org/article/upskilling-new-americans-innovative-english-training-for-career-advancement/#instruction-delivery

22.

National Reporting System for Adult Education . (n.d.a). Resources for Reporting Measurable Skill Gains (MSG) Types. National Reporting System for Adult Education. https://nrsweb.org/policy-data/Resources-for-Reporting

23.

National Reporting System for Adult Education . (n.d.b). Who Provides Adult Education? U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 1, 2024, from https://nrsweb.org/sites/default/files/Topic2-Education-Providers-508.pdf

24.

National Center for Education Statistics . (2020). Adult numeracy in the United States (NCES 2020-025). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020025.pdf

25.

Park

Takahashi

(2013). 90-day cycle handbook. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/90DC_Handbook_external_10_8.pdf

26.

Patterson

M. B.

Research Allies for Lifelong Learning . (2020). PIAAC numeracy skills and home use among adult English learners. Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy, 2(1), 22–24.

27.

Patterson

M. B.

(2018). Critiquing adult participation in education, report 2: Motivation around adult education. Research Allies for Lifelong Learning. https://valueusa.org/projects

28.

Patterson

M. B.

(2022). Assessed skills and skill Use of adults with learning disabilities in PIAAC. American Institutes for Research. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/51bb74b8e4b0139570ddf020/t/61e1b862d8cb5e365a70a9bb/1642182756846/Assessed+Skills+and+Skill+Use+of+Adults+with+LD+in+PIAAC+_final.pdf

29.

Pickard

(2021). Accountability in adult basic education: The marginalization of adults with difficulty reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20986910

30.

Pimentel

(2013). College and career readiness standards for adult education. MPR Associates. https://lincs.ed.gov/publica-tions/pdf/CCRStandardsAdultEd.pdf

31.

Pivovarova

Powers

J. M.

(2021). Do immigrants experience education-job mismatch? New evidence from the U.S. PIAAC. American Institutes for Research. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/51bb74b8e4b0139570ddf020/t/60b7ccde2a2ef7287828adeb/1622658271688/2021_Pivovarova_Powers_Immigrants_Education-Job_Mismatch.pdf

32.

Rosen

D. J.

Stewart

(2015). Blended learning for the adult education classroom. Essential Education. https://app.essentialed.com/resources/blended-learning-teachers-guide-web.pdf

33.

Saliga

L. M.

Daviso

Stuart

Pachnowski

L. M.

(2015). Steps forward and back in adult numeracy teacher professional development: A reflection on a teacher workshop experience. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 3(3), 49–55.

34.

Smith

Hofer

(2003). The characteristics and concerns of adult basic education teachers (NCSALL Reports #26). National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508605.pdf

35.

Smith

Hofer

Gillespie

Solomon

Rowe

(2003). How teachers change: A study of professional development in adult education. National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508607.pdf

36.

Snyder

(2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

37.

Still

Crane

(2017). Fundamentals of user-centered design: A practical approach. Taylor & Francis Group.

38.

Sun

(2010). Standards, equity, and advocacy: Employment conditions of ESOL teachers in adult basic education and literacy systems. TESOL Journal, 1(1), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.5054/tj.2010.215135

39.

The American Institutes for Research (AIR) . (2006). A review of the literature in adult numeracy: Research and conceptual issues. Office of Vocational and Adult Education. Division of Adult education and literacy, U.S. Department of education. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/Adult_Numeracy_Lit_Review_3-24-06__2__-_FINAL_0.pdf

40.

U.S. Department of Education . (2015). Integrating technology in WIOA. U.S. Department of Education: Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/integrating-technology.pdf

41.

U.S. Department of Education . (2020). Program memorandum OCTAE 20-3. U.S. Department of Education: Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/octae-program-memo-20-3.pdf