To help graduate students with academic writing, a college of education at a large university implemented a new service, Writing Support Circles. Based on the results of the first series of this service, we changed its design. The purpose of this article is to share how changes in the design affected these adult learners’ writing self-efficacy and workshop satisfaction.
BitchenerJ.TurnerE. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of one approach to the teaching of thematic unit construction of literature reviews. Assessing Writing, 16, 123-136. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.002
4.
CraswellG. (2005). Writing for academic success. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
5.
GallavanN. P.BowlesF. A.YoungC. T. (2007). Learning to write and writing to learn. Action in Teacher Education, 29, 61-69. doi:10.1080/01626620.2007.10463449
MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (2006). Introduction. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 1-10). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
McCarthyD. S. (2008). Communication in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 108, 334-340. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17846.x
9.
McMillenP. S.GarciaJ.BolinD. A. (2010). Promoting professionalism in master’s level teachers through research based writing. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36, 427-439.
PlakhotnikM. S.RoccoT. S. (2012). Implementing writing support circles with adult learners in a non-formal education setting. Adult Learning, 23, 76-81. doi:10.1177/1045159512443507
