Abstract
Background:
Down syndrome (DS) is a major genetic cause of intellectual disability. In an animal model of DS, fluoxetine was shown to restore brain architecture and cognitive performance, acting primarily on the hippocampus, with effects persisting after treatment discontinuation. In this translational study, we assessed the safety and tolerability of fluoxetine at the standard labeled dose and explored selected efficacy endpoints to inform future clinical trials.
Methods:
The study was approved as a phase I, open-label study. Participants with full trisomy 21 received fluoxetine (10 mg/day) for 6 months, followed by a 6-month observation period. The primary endpoint, safety and tolerability, was evaluated through clinical examinations, biochemistry, plasma fluoxetine and norfluoxetine levels, electroencephalography, and electrocardiography at multiple time-points. As a secondary efficacy endpoint, we selected a set of cognitive tests to explore hippocampus-dependent functions and adaptive behavior.
Results:
Fourteen children with DS (8.1 ± 1.24 years; range 6–10) were enrolled, and 12 completed the 12-month study. No serious or severe adverse events (AEs) occurred. All AEs resolved without sequelae. Short-term terminal insomnia was observed in two patients. Neuropsychological assessments revealed improvements in visuospatial processing tasks during the study. Analysis of adaptive behavior suggested enhanced expression skills.
Conclusions:
These findings indicate that fluoxetine is safe in children with DS. The association with terminal insomnia warrants specific investigation in future trials and strategies to optimize tolerability are discussed. Efficacy analyses highlight the visuospatial processing domain as potentially responsive to treatment, supporting further research.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
