Paperwork helps move cases through the United States foster care system, which decides whether children will be returned to their parents or become available for adoption. Though the forms help case workers come to reliable conclusions for various decisions throughout cases, the constructs and categories used in paperwork may still bias form use and outcomes. This research qualitatively analyzes 10 Michigan foster care forms as guided by the anthropological concepts of categorization and classification. Findings indicate that forms measure families against a societal baseline of acceptable care, cases are constructed in a temporal source path goal schema that associates damage with the past and care with the future, and that damage and care are radially related.
BaughmanC.ColesT.FeinbergJ.NewtonH. (2021). The surveillance tentacles of the child welfare system. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 11(3), 501–532. https://doi.org/10.52214/cjrl.v11i3.8743
5.
BiehlJ. (2013). Vita: Life in a zone of social abandonment. University of California Press.
BowkerG. C.StarS. L. (2000). Invisible mediators of action: Classification and the ubiquity of standards. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(1–2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2000.9677652
8.
BrownC. C.WangE. W.GoadC. (2022). A review of the psychometric properties of the child and adolescent needs and strengths (CANS): Perspectives on the present state of the literature and future directions. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 39(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2022.2038337
ChandlerD. (2017). Distributed responsibility moral agency in a non-linear world. In UlbertC.FinkenbuschP.SondermannE.DebielT. (Eds.), Moral agency and the politics of responsibility (pp. 238–254). Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/wayne/detail.action?docID=5144990
12.
ChapmanC. (2025). Reifying risk and health: Cultural normativity, bureaucracy, and moral quandary in child abuse investigations in Japan. Children and Youth Services Review, 170, 108135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108135
ChildsK. K.BrysonS. L.SoderstromM. F.ReedA. (2024). An assessment of the internal structure of the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) using two samples of high-risk adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 156, 107365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107365
Cuccaro-AlaminS.FoustR.VaithianathanR.Putnam-HornsteinE. (2017). Risk assessment and decision making in child protective services: Predictive risk modeling in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 291–298.
EllisK.DavisA.RummeryK. (1999). Needs assessment, street-level bureaucracy and the new community care. Social Policy & Administration, 33(3), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00150
22.
FeelyM.BoskE. A. (2021). That which is essential has been made invisible: The need to bring a structural risk perspective to reduce racial disproportionality in child welfare. Race and Social Problems, 13(1), 49–62.
23.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality (1st American ed.). Pantheon Books.
24.
HackingI. (1999). The social construction of what?Harvard University Press.
HuffhinesL.TunnoA. M.ChoB.HambrickE. P.CamposI.LichtyB.JacksonY. (2016). Case file coding of child maltreatment: Methods, challenges, and innovations in a longitudinal project of youth in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.06.019
27.
HullM. S. (2012). Government of paper: The materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan. University of California Press.
28.
JohnsonM. A.StoneS.LouC.VuC. M.LingJ.MizrahiP.AustinM. J. (2008). Family assessment in child welfare services: Instrument comparisons. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 5(1–2), 57–90.
KuczynskiL.DalyK. (2003). Qualitative methods for inductive (theory-generating) research: Psychological and sociological approaches. In KuczynskiL. (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 373–392). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229645.n18
32.
LakoffG. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago press.
33.
LamplandM.StarS. L. (Eds.). (2009). Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Cornell University Press.
LeeT. (2022). Response to the symposium: Strengthened bonds—Abolishing the Child Welfare System and re-envisioning child well-being foreword. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 12(1), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3917958
36.
LeinaweaverJ. B. (2008). The circulation of children: Kinship, adoption, and morality in Andean Peru. Duke University Press.
37.
MarinerK. A. (2019). “Who you are in these pieces of paper”: Imagining future kinship through auto/biographical adoption documents in the United States. Cultural Anthropology, 34(4), 529–554. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca34.4.03
Ohnuki-TierneyE. (1981). Phases in human perception/conception/symbolization processes: Cognitive anthropology and symbolic classification. American Ethnologist, 8(3), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1981.8.3.02a00030
PolikoffN. D.SpinakJ. M. (2021). Strengthened bonds: Abolishing the Child Welfare System and re-envisioning child well-being. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 11, 427.
RobertsD. (2022). Torn apart: How the child welfare system destroys black families—And how abolition can build a safer world. Basic Books.
48.
SaxenaD.MoonS. Y.ShehataD.GuhaS. (2022). Unpacking invisible work practices, constraints, and latent power relationships in child welfare through casenote analysis [Conference session]. 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–22.
49.
SaxenaD.RepaciC.SageM. D.GuhaS. (2022). How to train a (bad) algorithmic caseworker: A quantitative deconstruction of risk assessments in child welfare [Conference session]. CHI conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts, pp. 1–7.
ValenzuelaR. (2021). Audit culture, accountability, and care: A phenomenological anthropology of child welfare. Qualitative Social Work, 20(6), 1477–1495. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211039512
YanowD. (2017). Qualitative-interpretive methods in policy research. In FischerF.MillerG.SidneyM. S. (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 405–415). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315093192
