While social work remains deeply human-centered, there are questions about how artificial intelligence (AI) can support the advancement of social work research. AI can guide researchers in various spheres, including developing and refining research questions, producing literature reviews and conducting analyses. AI can boost social work research productivity and position the profession as forward-thinking. However, since the buzz around ChatGPT began in 2022 there have been serious apprehensions around its potential misuse and ethical concerns. Through this note, our goal is to review the use of AI in social work research, summarize the types of AI software that can be utilized and conclude with a discussion about the considerations that social work scholars need to keep in mind while utilizing AI.
AljuaidH.IftikharR.AhmadS.AsifM.AfzalM. T. (2021). Important citation identification using sentiment analysis of in-text citations. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101492
Barsky-MooreJ.BarskyA. (2025). Mitigating anchoring bias when using AI in social work research: Responsible conduct of AI-assisted research. International Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.55521/10-022-106
11.
Bit by Bit. (2025). Bit.ai [Artificial intelligence system]. https://bit.ai/
12.
Brain Pod AI LLC. (n.d.) Brain Pod AI [Artificial intelligence system]. https://brainpod.ai/
13.
BueleJ.Llerena-AguirreL. (2025). Transformations in academic work and faculty perceptions of artificial intelligence in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1603763
14.
Caesar Labs Inc. (2025). Julius [Artificial intelligence system]. https://julius.ai/
ChetwyndE. (2024). Ethical use of artificial intelligence for scientific writing: Current trends. Journal of Human Lactation, 40(2), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241235160
20.
ChristouP. A. (2023). Ηow to use artificial intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research?The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 1968–1980. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406
Creswell BáezJ.VictorB. G.DysartC.GoldkindL. (2025). “I don’t understand it, but okay”: An empirical study of mental health practitioners’ readiness to use large language models. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 43(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2025.2479475
23.
DavisonR. M.ChughtaiH.NielsenP.MarabelliM.IannacciF.OffenbeekM.TarafdarM.TrenzM.TechatassanasoontornA. A.Díaz AndradeA.PanteliN. (2024). The ethics of using generative AI for qualitative data analysis. Information Systems Journal, 34(5), 1433–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12504
FisterT.ThiruvathukalG. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence employment interviews: Examining limitations, biases, and perceptions. Computer, 57(10), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2024.3404669
27.
FitzpatrickK. K.DarcyA.VierhileM. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19. https://mental.jmir.org/2017/2/e19/
28.
GarkischM.GoldkindL. (2024). Considering a unified model of artificial intelligence enhanced social work: A systematic review. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 10, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-024-00326-y
29.
GillinghamP. (2019). Can predictive algorithms assist decision-making in social work with children and families?Child Abuse Review, 28(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2547
30.
GoldkindL.WolfL.GlennonA.RiosJ.NissenL. (2024). The end of the world as we know it? ChatGPT and social work. Social Work, 69(1), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad044
HitchcockL. I.SageM.ScottC. F.SingerJ.BealB.GlennonA.ZiskeH. C.OvalleR. (2024). Grand challenge of social work’s harness technology for social good: Scoping review. Research on Social Work Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241304370
JonesM. V. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in workforce learning and development: A systematic review [Doctoral dissertation]. Old Dominion University.
KonyaA.NematzadehP. (2024). Recent applications of AI to environmental disciplines: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 906, 167705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167705
39.
LevacD.ColquhounH.O’brienK. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
40.
LiL.WangM.JianM. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted case management in social work services: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251329531
41.
LittmanM. L.AjunwaI.BergerG.BoutilierC.CurrieM.Doshi-VelezF.HadfieldG.HorowitzM. C.IsbellC.KitanoH.LevyK.LyonsT.MitchellM.ShahJ.SlomanS.VallorS.WalshT. (2021). Gathering strength, gathering storms: The one hundred year study on artificial intelligence (AI100) 2021 study panel report. Stanford University. http://ai100.stanford.edu/2021-report
42.
MahmudM. M.WongS. F.Mohd A’seriM. S.AhmadR.YaacobY.QaziA.MustamamN. I.NagasundramU. (2025). Exploring academic perceptions and challenges in AI integration in higher education. In Proceedings of the 2024 16th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 167–172). https://doi.org/10.1145/3702163.3702410
MollickE. (2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. Penguin.
45.
MustamamN. I.NagasundramU. (2025). Exploring academic perceptions and challenges in AI integration in higher education. In Proceedings of the 2024 16th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 167–172). https://doi.org/10.1145/3702163.3702410
NebekerC.TorousJ.Bartlett EllisR. J. (2019). Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17, 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1377-7
48.
NikolicS.WentworthI.SheridanL.MossS.DuursmaE.JonesR. A.RosM.MiddletonR. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643
49.
NuwasiimaM.AhononM. P.KadiriC. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in social work practice. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(1), 080–097. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.2998
RayP. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
ReamerF. G. (2023). Artificial intelligence in social work: Emerging ethical issues. International Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 20(2), 52–71. https://jswve.org/volume-20/issue-2/item-05/
SingerJ. B.BáezJ. C.RiosJ. A. (2023). AI creates the message: Integrating AI language learning models into social work education and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 59(2), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2189878
VictorB. G.SokolR. L.GoldkindL.PerronB. E. (2023). Recommendations for social work researchers and journal editors on the use of generative AI and large language models. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 14(3), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/726021
WatsonC.CooperN.PalacioD. N.MoranK.PoshyvanykD. (2021). A systematic literature review on the use of deep learning in software engineering research. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 31(2), 1–58. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.06520
YuB.KumbierK. (2018). Artificial intelligence and statistics. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 19(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1700813
78.
ZhangJ.FengS. (2021). Machine learning modeling: A new way to do quantitative research in social sciences in the era of AI. Journal of Web Engineering, 20(2), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2023
