Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This qualitative reflexive thematic analysis explores barriers faced by non-kin adoptive families in the U.S. foster care system. Researchers completed semi-structured interviews with 20 adults from 12 families, aged 30 to 56, who adopted children within the past 10 years. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed three stages of the adoption process—licensing, placement, and legal adoption—each fraught with systemic challenges, including lost documents, inadequate support, and inconsistent treatment by social services. This study highlights the urgent need for policy reforms such as streamlined documentation systems and enhanced support for adoptive families to increase successful adoptions and reduce the number of children aging out of foster care without a permanent family.

Keywords

foster care child welfare adoption qualitative research social work research public health and social work child and family welfare

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson

A. J.

Gonet

P. A.

(2007). Strengthening adoption practice, listening to adoptive families. Child Welfare, 86(2), 87–104. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45400393

Atkinson

A. J.

Gonet

P. A.

Freundlich

Riley

D. B.

(2013). Adoption competent clinical practice: Defining its meaning and development. Adoption Quarterly, 16(3–4), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2013.844215

Barth

R. P.

Lee

C. K.

Wildfire

Guo

(2007). A comparison of the governmental costs of long-term foster care and adoption. Social Service Review, 81(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/511875

Bausch

R. S.

Hanlon

(2020). Adopting through foster care: Understanding the needs and barriers of prospective adoptive parents. Adoption Quarterly, 23(2), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1725923

Bipartisan Policy Center. (2024). A national review of child welfare legislation. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/report/child-welfare-legislation-national-review

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun

Clarke

(2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Casey Family Programs. (2023). State-by-state data. https://www.casey.org/state-data/

Casey Family Programs. (2024a). A kin-first approach to child welfare. https://www.casey.org/kin-first-approach

10.

Casey Family Programs. (2024b). The value of kinship care in the child welfare system. https://www.casey.org/kinship-values

11.

Celock

(2024). After adoption: What support do families need? Child Welfare League of America. https://www.cwla.org/after-adoption

12.

Children’s Bureau. (2023). The AFCARS report no. 30. Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cb/afcars-report-30.pdf

13.

Children’s Bureau. (2025, May 1). Adoption and foster care statistics: Preliminary data dashboard. Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/afcars

14.

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2018). Foster care adoption. Children’s Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/f_fospar.pdf

15.

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2019). The impact of adoption. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/impact-adoption

16.

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2020). Kinship caregivers and the child welfare system. Children’s Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/f_kinshi/

17.

Coakley

T. M.

Buehler

(2008). Foster contact with birth parents: What does it mean for adoption outcomes? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 25(3), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-008-0126-4

18.

Coakley

T. M.

White

(2021). Fostering permanency: Identifying and addressing systemic barriers in adoption from foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38(6), 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-021-00753-2

19.

Cushing

Greenblatt

(2009). Vulnerable youth and the transition to adulthood: Youth from foster care and juvenile justice. Child Welfare, 88(4), 7–29.

20.

Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption. (2024). Wendy’s wonderful kids. https://www.davethomasfoundation.org/our-programs/wendys-wonderful-kids/

21.

Denby

(2012). Reunification of African American children in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(2), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.020

22.

Doughty

Meakings

Shelton

K. H.

(2017). The educational progress of children in out-of-home care in Wales. British Journal of Social Work, 47(5), 1581–1599. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw100

23.

Freundlich

(2000). Adoption and ethics: The role of race, culture, and national origin in adoption. Child Welfare League of America.

24.

Freundlich

(2006). Research on post-adoption services: Implications for practice, program development, and policy. In Dore

(Ed.), The postadoption experience: Adoptive families’ service needs and service outcomes (pp. 283–298). CWLA Press.

25.

Gibbs

D. A.

Siebenaler

Barth

R. P.

(2005). Assessing the field of post-adoption services: Family needs, program models, and evaluation issues. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/assessing-field-post-adoption-services-family-needs-program-models-evaluation-issues

26.

Grotevant

H. D.

(2000). Openness in adoption: Research with the Adoption Kinship Network. Adoption Quarterly, 4(1), 45–65.

27.

Guest

Bunce

Johnson

(2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

28.

Guggenheim

(2005). The effects of recent trends to accelerate the termination of parental rights. Family Law Quarterly, 39(3), 479–495.

29.

Hanlon

Quade

(2022). Profiles in adoption: A survey of adoptive parents and secondary data analysis of federal adoption files. National Council for Adoption. https://adoptioncouncil.org/research/profiles-in-adoption/

30.

Harris Insights & Analytics, LLC. (2021). 2022 U.S. adoption attitudes survey. https://www.davethomasfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022-US-Adoption-and-Foster-Care-Attitudes-Report-WEB-Final.pdf

31.

Kamarck

E. C.

Hansen

M. E.

Wilson

J. B.

Katz

(2012, September). Eliminating barriers to the adoption of children in foster care (HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP12-040). John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9804493/RWP12-040_Kamarck_Wilson.pdf

32.

Kaplan Roszia

Maxon

A. D

. (2019). Seven core issues in adoption and permanency: A comprehensive guide to promoting understanding and healing. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

33.

Leung

Erich

(2002). Family functioning of adoptive children with special needs: Implications for adoption preservation services. Children and Youth Services Review, 24(11), 799–816.

34.

Lindner

Hanlon

(2023). Outcomes of youth with foster care experiences based on permanency outcome—Adoption, aging out, long-term foster care, and reunification: A systematic review. Child and Youth Services Review, 156, 107366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107366

35.

McCloud

Botterell

(2014). From placement to permanency: Realities, challenges, and innovations in adoption and foster care. Child and Youth Services Review, 47, 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.10.002

36.

McRoy

R. G.

Freundlich

Kroll

(2007). Making the case for a child-focused adoption process. Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. https://www.adoptioninstitute.org/publications/making-the-case-for-a-child-focused-adoption-process

37.

Merkel-Holguin

Drury

Gibley-Reed

Lara

Jihad

Grint

Marlowe

(2022). Structures of oppression in the U.S. child welfare system: Reflections on administrative barriers to equity. Societies, 12(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12010026

38.

National Foster Youth Institute. (2024). Foster care facts and statistics. https://nfyi.org/51-useful-aging-out-of-foster-care-statistics-social-race-media/

39.

Nebraska Children’s Home Society. (2024). Post-adoption support for families. https://blog.nchs.org/post-adoption-support-families

40.

North Carolina Division of Social Services. (2024). Removing barriers to post-adoption services. Practice Notes, 10(1). https://practicenotes.org/vol10_n1/removing.htm

41.

Olmos-Vega

F. M.

Stalmeijer

R. E.

Varpio

Kahlke

(2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

42.

Riley-Behringer

Cage

(2014). Foster parent perspectives on navigating the foster-to-adopt process. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 31(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-013-0323-0

43.

Roberts

(2002). Shattered bonds: The color of child welfare. Basic Civitas Books.

44.

Rycus

J. S.

Freundlich

Hughes

R. C.

Keefer

Oakes

E. J.

(2006, March). Confronting barriers to successful adoption. Family Court Review, 44(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00081.x

45.

Saldaña

(2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.

46.

Sankaran

(2019). Termination of parental rights: When good intentions go wrong. Michigan Child Welfare Law Journal, 23(1), 4–7.

47.

Silverstein

D. N.

Kaplan

(1982). Lifelong issues in adoption. Social Work, 27(3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/27.3.243

48.

Smith

S. L.

(2010). Keeping the promise: The critical need for post-adoption services to enable children and families to succeed. Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. https://adoptioninstitute.org/publications/keeping-the-promise-the-critical-need-for-post-adoption-services-to-enable-children-and-families-to-succeed

49.

Urban Institute. (2015). Data walks: An innovative way to share data with communities. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2022-03/2000510-data-walks-an-innovative-way-to-share-data-with-communities.pdf

50.

Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2004, March). How do court continuances influence the time children spend in foster care? (Report No. 04-03-3901). WSIPP. https://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/874

Barriers Non-Kin Adoptive Families Overcome When Adopting Through the U.S. Foster Care System

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References