Since the racial justice reckoning in the United States, a debate has persisted within academia whether the child welfare or family policing system should be reformed or abolished. Various pieces of evidence have been presented in this debate; however, the perspectives of system-impacted young people have been largely absent. This paper presents findings from a qualitative youth participatory action research (YPAR) study (n = 20) that demonstrate that a proportion of system-impacted youth believed the system should be abolished and that support for young people should be re-imagined. The knowledge that system-impacted young people viewed the system as harmful and unrepairable has significant implications for practice, supporting the upending of the system and the creation of alternative supports for youth that center their self-determination and humanity.
BarthR. P.BerrickJ. D.GarciaA. R.DrakeB.Jonson-ReidM.GyourkoJ. R.GreesonJ. K. P. (2022). Research to consider while effectively re-designing child welfare services. Research on Social Work Practice, 32(5), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315211050000
2.
BarthR. P.Jonson-ReidM.GreesonJ. K. P.DrakeB.BerrickJ. D.GarciaA. R.ShawT. V.GyourkoJ. R. (2020). Outcomes following child welfare services: What are they and do they differ for black children?Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14(5), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1814541
3.
BriggsL. (2021). Taking children: A history of American terror. University of California Press.
4.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
5.
ClarkS. L.AkinB. A.McCallS.PaceleyM.ByersK.GomezM. (2023). “Youth are not something to check off your to do list”: Poetic inquiry into the symbols youth, parents and professionals use to reimagine supports for youth in foster care. Child & Family Social Work, 28(3), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12986
6.
ClarkeA. E.FrieseC.WashburnR. S. (2017). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the interpretive turn. Sage.
7.
CopelandV. A. (2021). “It’s the only system we’ve got”: Exploring emergency response decision-making in child welfare. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 11(3), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.52214/cjrl.v11i3.8740
8.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2015). Basics of the qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
9.
CourtneyM. E.DworskyA. L.LeeJ. S.RaapM. (2010). Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at ages 23 and 24. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
10.
CourtneyM. E.OkpychN. J.HartyJ.FengH.ParkS. (Ethan)PowersJ.NadonM.DittoD. J.ParkK. (2020). Findings from the California Youth Transitions to Adulthood Study (CalYOUTH): Conditions of youth at age 23. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago. https://www.chapinhall.org/wp-content/uploads/CY_YT_RE1020.pdf
Department of Health and Human Services. (2022). The AFCARS report: Preliminary estimates for FY 2021 as of June 28, 2022. Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb
13.
DettlaffA. J.BoydR. (2023). The Intended Consequences. In DettlaffA. J. (Ed.), Confronting the racist legacy of the American child welfare system: The case for abolition. Oxford University Press, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197675267.001.0001
14.
DettlaffA. J.PendletonM. (2023). Reforms are designed to fail. In DettlaffA. J. (Ed.), Confronting the racist legacy of the American child welfare system: The case for abolition. Oxford University Press, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197675267.001.0001
15.
DettlaffA. J.BoydR. (2020). Racial disproportionality and disparities in the child welfare system: Why do they exist, and what can be done to address them?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220980329
16.
DettlaffA. J.BoydR.MerrittD.PlummerJ. A.SimonJ. D. (2024). Racial bias, poverty, and the notion of evidence. Child Welfare, 99(3), 61–89.
17.
DettlaffA. J.WeberK.PendletonM.BoydR.BettencourtB.BurtonL. (2020). It is not a broken system, it is a system that needs to be broken: The upEND movement to abolish the child welfare system. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14(5), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1814542
18.
DeyI. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
19.
DoucetM.PrattH.DzhenganinM.ReadJ. (2022). Nothing about us without us: Using Participatory Action Research (PAR) and arts-based methods as empowerment and social justice tools in doing research with youth “aging out” of care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 130, 105358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105358
20.
EaddyN.HopkinsM.Mikell MontgomeryD. (2023). Black mothers matter: Reimagining child protection and a state that supports black mothers. In AbramsL. S.CreweS. E.DettlaffA. J.WilliamsJ. H. (Eds.), Social work, White supremacy, and racial justice: Reckoning with our history, interrogating our present, reimagining our future. Oxford University Press.
21.
ForenzaB.HavlicekJ. (2022). Identifying the relationship between implementation and outcomes of foster youth advisory boards in the United States: The push for accountability. Child Welfare, 99(6), 87–114.
22.
GarciaA. R.BerrickJ. D.Jonson-ReidM.BarthR. P.GyourkoJ. R.KohlP.GreesonJ. K. P.DrakeB.CookV. (2023). The stark implications of abolishing child welfare: An alternative path towards support and safety. Child & Family Social Work, 29, 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13141
GruberT. (2023). Beyond mandated reporting: Debunking assumptions to support children and families. Abolitionist Perspectives in Social Work, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.52713/apsw.v1i1.12
25.
HernandezJ. (2022). Foster youth perspectives: How foster youth navigate and mobilize their rights within the foster care system. Humanity & Society, 46(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597621991546
IsraelB. A.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A.BeckerA. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
28.
JacquezF.VaughnL. M.WagnerE. (2013). Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: A review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR). American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9533-7
29.
JordanJ. (2012). Directed by desire: The collected poems of June Jordan. Copper Canyon Press.
30.
KabaM. (2021). We do this ’til we free us: Abolitionist organizing and transforming justice. Haymarket Books.
31.
KellyL. (2021). Abolition or reform: Confronting the symbiotic relationship between “child welfare” and the carceral state. Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 17(2), 255–320.
KoolsS. M. (1997). Adolescent identity development in foster care. Family Relations, 46(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.2307/585124
34.
McPhersonG.ThorneS. (2006). Exploiting exceptions to enhance interpretive qualitative health research: Insights from a study of cancer communication. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500210
35.
MontgomeryD. A. M. (2022). “They don’t understand us and are afraid of us”: black social workers’ perspectives on the role of anti-blackness within foster care service provision to black children. Child Welfare, 100(1), 141–164.
PoncianoL. (2013). The voices of youth in foster care: A participant action research study. Action Research, 11(4), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750313502554
38.
PryceJ.LeeW.CroweE.ParkD.McCarthyM.OwensG. (2019). A case study in public child welfare: County-level practices that address racial disparity in foster care placement. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 13(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2018.1467354
39.
RobertsD. E. (2002). Shattered bonds: The color of child welfare. Basic Civitas Books.
40.
RobertsD. E. (2014). Child protection as surveillance of African American families. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36(4), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2014.967991
RuffS. C.HarrisonK. (2020). “Ask me what I want”: Community-based participatory research to explore transition-age foster youth’s use of support services. Children and Youth Services Review, 108, 104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104608
44.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
45.
ShdaimahC.ZhaoL. (2022). Adaptive responsivity: A youth-driven model for thriving in foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 41(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00869-x
46.
SmeyneC. N. (2024). Fostering participation and change through action research conducted with youth in the foster care system – A note from the field. Action Research, 14767503241253371. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503241253371
47.
SmithP. L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books Ltd.
48.
TajimaE. A.DayA. G.KanuhaV. K.Rodriquez-JenKinsJ.PryceJ. A. (2022). What counts as evidence in child welfare research?Research on Social Work Practice, 32(5), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315211069549
49.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2024). National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) child file, FFY 2000–2022 [Dataset]. Cornell University’s National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect. http://www.ndacan.cornell.edu
WangC. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185
52.
WangC. (2006). Youth participation in photovoice as a strategy for community change. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1–2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_09
53.
YonasM. A.JaimeM. C. D.BaroneJ.ValentiS.DocumétP.RyanC. M.MillerE. (2016). Community partnered research ethics training in practice—A collaborative approach to certification. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616650802
