In “Counterpoint: Child Welfare System: Evolution/Revolution,” Dr. Jessica Pryce responded to my article, “Point: Abolition of the Child Welfare System: An Invitation,” by offering an alternative to abolition, proposing a blend of reformative and transformative reforms. In this response, I highlight two foundational differences in our views that, I believe, distinguish our approaches to the child welfare system: First, our understanding of the system’s origins and intent, and second, our understanding of the role of reforms. These differences also underscore a broader distinction in how we view the role of the state in the lives of children, families, and communities.
GilD. (1970). Violence against children: Physical child abuse in the United States. Harvard University Press.
4.
JacksonG. L. (1972). Blood in my eye. Random House.
5.
KimH.WildemanC.Jonson-ReidM.DrakeB. (2017). Lifetime prevalence of investigating child maltreatment among US children. American Journal of Public Health, 107(2), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303545
RodríguezD. (2021). Police reform as counterinsurgency: How reformist approaches to police violence expand police power and legitimate the next phase of domestic warfare. In KaepernickC. (Ed.), Abolition for the people: The movement for a future without policing (pp. 154–161). Kaepernick Publishing.
