Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many responses to intimate partner violence (IPV), especially work to engage those who have caused harm through IPV, have remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades despite the widespread, long-lasting, and devastating impact IPV continues to have on communities. Engaging people who cause harm is a crucial part of supporting survivors, fostering healthy relationships and communities, and ending violence. In response to a need to develop more effective programming, New York City implemented a comprehensive citywide approach to people who cause harm, developing multiple programming options for people who cause harm both within and outside of the criminal legal system. This practice note outlines these programs and proposes several practice implications for the field.

Keywords

domestic violence abuse/ neglect/ violence subjects of practice criminal justice /forensic social work practice interventions and research trauma-informed practice modes of practice anti-oppressive practice community practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adkison-Stevens

Timmons

(2018). Prevention through liberation: Theory and practice of anti-oppression as primary prevention of sexual and domestic violence. Oregon Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence. https://tinyurl.com/OCADSVPreventionLiberation2018

Babcock

J. C.

Green

C. E.

Robie

(2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1023–1053. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Public Safety Canada.

Center for Court Innovation. (2022). Guiding principles for engagement and intervention with people who cause harm through intimate partner violence. http://tinyurl.com/CJIGPs2022

Cheng

Davis

Jonson-Reid

Yaeger

(2019). Compared to what? A meta-analysis of batterer intervention studies using nontreated controls or comparisons. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(3), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019865927

Cronholm

P. F.

Forke

C. M.

Wade

Bair-Merritt

M. H.

Davis

Harkins-Schwarz

& Fein

J. A.

(2015). Adverse childhood experiences: Expanding the concept of adversity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(3), 354–361. https://doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001

Davis

Jonson-Reid

Dahm

Fernandez

Stroops

Sabri

(2020). The men’s group at St. Pius V: A case study of a parish-based voluntary partner abuse intervention program. American Journal of Men’s Health, 14(1), 1557988319891287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988319891287

Decker

M. R.

Holliday

C. N.

Hameeduddin

Shah

Miller

Dantzler

Goodmark

(2022). Defining justice: Restorative and retributive justice goals among intimate partner violence survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6), NP2844–NP2867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520943728

Edmund

(2022). Gun violence disproportionately and overwhelmingly hurts communities of color. Center for American Progress. https://tinyurl.com/CAPGunViolence2022

10.

Ervin

Nembhard

Nmai

(2024). A new nonmandated program for people who cause intimate partner violence: Findings from an implementation assessment in New York City. Urban Institute. https://tinyurl.com/UINonmandatedAPIP2024

11.

Ferraro

K. J.

(2017). Current research on batterer intervention programs and implications for policy. The Battered Women’s Justice Project. https://bwjp.org/assets/batterer-intervention-paper-final-2018.pdf

12.

Fleck-Henderson

Areán

J. C.

(2004). Breaking the cycle: Fathering after violence: Curriculum guidelines and tools for batterer intervention programs. Family Violence Prevention Fund. http://tinyurl.com/FWV2004FAV

13.

Gondolf

E. W.

(2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Sage.

14.

Gwinn

Hellman

(2018). Hope rising: How the science of hope can change your life. Morgan James Publishing.

15.

Hicks

. (2011). Essential elements of dignity. In Hicks

(Ed.), Dignity: Its essential role in resolving conflict. Yale University Press. https://organizingengagement.org/models/dignity-model/

16.

Holliday

C. N.

Morse

S. M.

Irvin

N. A.

Green-Manning

Nitsch

L. M.

Burke

J. G.

Campbell

J. C.

Decker

M. R.

(2019). Concept mapping: Engaging urban men to understand community influences on partner violence perpetration. Journal of Urban Health, 96(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0297-8

17.

Kelly

Westmarland

(2015). Domestic violence perpetrator programmes: Steps towards change [Project Mirabal final report]. London Metropolitan University; Durham University. https://tinyurl.com/Mirabal2015

18.

Labriola

Rempel

Davis

R. C.

(2005). Testing the effectiveness of batterer programs and judicial monitoring. Center for Court Innovation. https://tinyurl.com/2s4a6bz2

19.

Lambson

S. H.

Reich

W. A.

(2017). Intimate partner violence as a community problem: Community perspectives from Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn. Center for Court Innovation. https://tinyurl.com/CJIIPVBedstuy2017

20.

Mills

L. G.

Barocas

Butters

R. P.

Ariel

(2019). A randomized controlled trial of restorative justice-informed treatment for domestic violence crimes. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(12), 1284–1294. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0724-1

21.

Morgan

R. E.

Truman

J. L.

(2020). Criminal victimization, 2019 (NCJ 255113). Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv19.pdf

22.

NYC Mayor’s Office to End Domestic and Gender-Based Violence. (2021). Family-related violence snapshots: New York City community board directors. https://tinyurl.com/3ncy289y

23.

Pence

E. L.

McDonnell

(1999). Developing policies and protocols. In Pence

E. L.

Shepard

(Eds.), Coordinated community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 41–64). Sage.

24.

Sasson

Allen

(2020). Using restorative approaches to address intimate partner violence: A New York City blueprint. Center for Court Innovation. https://tinyurl.com/CJIRJBlueprint2020

25.

Shah

(2017). Seeding generations: New strategies towards services for people who abuse. Center for Court Innovation. https://www.innovatingjustice.org/publications/seedinggenerations

26.

Snyder

C. R.

Harris

Anderson

J. R.

Holleran

S. A.

Irving

L. M.

Sigmon

S. T.

& Harney

(1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.570

27.

Thomforde Hauser

. (2017). What courts should know: Trends in intervention programming for abusive partners. Center for Court Innovation. https://tinyurl.com/CJIAPIPTrends2017

28.

Velonis

A. J.

Mahabir

D. F.

Maddox

O’Campo

(2018). Still looking for mechanisms. A realist review of batterer intervention programs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(4), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018791285

29.

West

C. M.

(2021). Widening the lens: Expanding the research on intimate partner violence in black communities. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 30(6), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2021.1919811

Building Multiple Pathways to Healing,Safety,and Accountability to Address Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References