In this study, we sought to understand the contexts, experiences, and needs among a sample of U.S. secondary education stakeholders to inform both a theoretical framework and policy contexts underpinning college and career readiness (CCR). Results confirmed a theoretically constructed framework of academic and non-academic CCR skills, with participants offering descriptions that validated and extended the framework. In addition, participants provided critical understandings of educational contexts in which CCR occurs, with both policy constraints and facilitative influences described. Participants identified strategies, policies, and practices to support student readiness for college and career outcomes. Finally, we provide study limitations and implications for research, policy, and practice.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
3.
ConleyD. T. (2010). College and career ready: Helping all students succeed beyond high school. Jossey-Bass.
4.
DorenB.MurrayC.GauJ. M. (2014). Salient predictors of school dropout among secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(4), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12044
GibbsA. (2012). Focus groups and group interviews. In ArthurJ.WaringM.CoeR.HedgesL. (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies in education (pp. 186–192). Sage.
7.
GreenS.SanczykA.ChambersC.MrazM.PollyD. (2023). College and career readiness: A literature synthesis. Journal of Education, 203, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211002209
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
10.
KruegerR.CaseyM. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
11.
LombardiA. R.KowittJ. S.StaplesF. E. (2015). Correlates of critical thinking and college and career readiness for students with and without disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414534888
12.
LombardiA. R.MonahanJ.MorningstarM. (2020). Integrating college and career readiness into transition education. In ShogrenK.WehmeyerM. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 268–281). Routledge.
13.
LombardiA. R.RifenbarkG. G.RogersH. J.SwaminathanH.TaconetA.MazzottiV. L.MorningstarM. E.WuR.LangdonS. (2023). Establishing construct validity of a measure of adolescent perceptions of college and career readiness. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221081229
14.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
15.
MazzottiV. L.MorningstarM. E.LombardiA.KwiatekS.TaconetA.BuddekeK.MonahanJ.HarrisR. (2022). Policy and practice considerations to support college and career readiness for youth with disabilities: A systematic mixed studies review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221130528
16.
MonahanJ.LombardiA.MadausJ.CarlsonS.FreemanJ.GelbarN. (2020). A systematic literature review of college and career readiness frameworks for students with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 31(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207320906816
17.
MorningstarM. E.LombardiA.FowlerC. H.TestD. W. (2017). A college and career readiness framework for secondary students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415589926
18.
MorningstarM. E.Lombardi TestD. W. (2018). Including college and career readiness within a multitiered systems of support framework. AERA Open, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418761880
NoyC. (2017). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
21.
ParkerC.ScottS.GeddesA. (2019). Snowball sampling. In AtkinsonP.DelamontS.CernatA.SakshaugJ. W.WilliamsR. A. (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710
22.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
23.
PonterottoJ. G. (2006). Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 538–549.
SchreierM. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
26.
Sociocultural Research Consultants, LLC. (2019). Dedoose web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (Version 8.1.8) [Computer software]. https://app.dedoose.com/App/?Version=8.1.8
27.
StemlerS. E. (2015). Content analysis. In ScottR.KosslynS. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–14). John Wiley.
WestM. R.KraftM. A.FinnA. S.MartinR. E.DuckworthA. L.GabrieliC. F.GabrieliJ. D. (2016). Promise and paradox: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715597298
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
