The Evolution of Access to Education Through Landmark Legislation,Court Cases,and Policy Initiatives Setting Precedent for The Gary B. Court Decision

Abstract

Access to education for all students has been long sought. Once defined as physical access to a school building, the concept of access has evolved since Brown v. Board of Education. The purpose of this policy review, conducted through archival research, is to examine the evolution of access to K–Grade 12 education for all students, with an emphasis on students with disabilities who are general education students first, to understand the implications of the 2020 U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Gary B. vs. Whitmer decision. For the first time, a federal court ruled that the constitution affords all students “a fundamental right to a basic minimum education.” Specifically, the evolving concept of access to education for all students, including students with disabilities, across (a) the school building, (b) curricular opportunities, (c) education outcomes, and (d) a college- and career-ready curriculum is outlined using landmark K–Grade 12 federal education legislation, court cases, and policy initiatives. Taken together, a basic minimum education includes access to challenging academic learning objectives, an emphasis on literacy, provision of educational materials of sufficient quantity and quality, and an adequate teacher workforce. Meeting these expectations assures genuine access to a public education for all students.

Keywords

access policy and law historical review Gary B.special education students with disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbot v. Burke, 100 N.J. 269, 495 A.2d 376. (1985).

The Advocacy Institute. (2020). ESSA & students with disabilities alternate assessment. Status of state-level one percent cap on alternate assessments by state. https://www.advocacyinstitute.org/ESSA/ESSA-OnePercentCapByState.shtml

Berwick

(2015, July). No Child Left Behind’s one big achievement? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/07/no-child-left-behind-one-big-achievement/399455/

Beyond NCLB. (2011). Views on the Elementary and Secondary Education Reauthorization Act, 112th Cong. 39-41 questioning of Ms. Beh Neas).

Boe

E. E.

Cook

L. H.

(2006). The chronic and increasing shortage of fully certified teachers in special and general education. Exceptional Children, 72, 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200404

Boe

E. E.

deBettencourt

L. U.

Dewey

Rosenberg

Sindelar

Leko

. (2013). Variability in demand for special education teachers: Indicators, explanations, and impacts. Exceptionality, 21(2), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2013.771563

Bosi

Reiter

(2014). Historical methodologies: Archival research and oral history in social movement research. In Donatella

(Ed.), Methodological practices in social movement research (pp. 117–143). Oxford University Press.

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483. (1954).

Canales

Frey

Walker

S. F.

Weiss

West

(2002). No state left behind: The challenges and opportunities of ESEA 2001. Education Commission of the States. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED468096

10.

Castellano

K. E.

A. D.

(2013). A practitioner’s guide to growth models. Council of Chief State School Officers. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED551292.pdf

11.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (2004). Framework for transitioning from IASA to NCLB. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED484704

12.

Darling-Hammond

(2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000

13.

Darling-Hammond

(2007). Evaluating ‘No Child Left Behind’: The problems and promises of Bush’s education policy. The Nation. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/library/blog/873

14.

Department of Education Organization Act, Pub. L. No. 96-88, 93 Stat. 668. (1979).

15.

Dewey

Sindelar

P. T.

Bettini

Boe

E. E.

Rosenberg

M. S.

Leko

(2017). Explaining the decline in special education teacher employment from 2005 to 2010. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916684620

16.

Education for All Handicapped Children Act, Pub. L. No. 94-142, 89 Stat. 773. (1975).

17.

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89-10, § 79 Stat. 27. (1965).

18.

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1, 137 S. Ct. 988. (2017).

19.

Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 4104. (2015).

20.

Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-380, 88 Stat. 514. (1974).

21.

Federal Judiciary. (n.d.). Access to education—Rule of law. Administrative Office of the United States Federal Judiciary.

22.

Ford

(1975, December 2). President Gerald R. Ford’s statement on the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Ford Library Museum. https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/speeches/750707.htm

23.

Freidel

Sidey

(2006). George W. Bush. The presidents of the United States of America. https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/presidents/george-w-bush/

24.

Gary B. et al. v. Whitmer, No. 18-1855 (6th Cir. 2020).

25.

Gilmour

A. F.

Fuchs

Wehby

J. H.

(2019). Are students with disabilities accessing the curriculum? A meta-analysis of the reading achievement gap between students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918795830

26.

Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-382, 108 Stat. 3518. (1994).

27.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17. (1997).

28.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, U.S.C § 1400 et seq. (2004).

29.

Irvin

T. B.

(1968). Assistance to states for education of handicapped children under ESEA title VI-A. Exceptional Children, 34(7), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440296803400717

30.

Jeffrey

J. R.

(1978). Education for children of the poor: A study of the origins and implementation of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Ohio State University Press.

31.

Jennings

J. L.

Bearak

J. M.

(2014). “Teaching to the test” in the NCLB era: How test predictability affects our understanding of student performance. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554449

32.

Johnson

L. B.

(1964, January 8). First State of the Union Address. [Transcript]. American Rhetoric, Online Speech Bank. https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/lbj1964stateoftheunion.htm

33.

Jorgensen

Hoffman

(2003). History of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Pearson Education.

34.

King

D. G.

(2009). Van Duyn v. Baker School District: A “material” improvement in evaluating a school district’s failure to implement individualized education programs. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 4(2), 457–486. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol4/iss2/6

35.

Klein

(2015, April). No Child Left Behind: An overview. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/no-child-left-behind-an-overview/2015/04

36.

Lehr

Haubrich

(1986). Legal precedents for students with severe handicaps. Exceptional Children, 52(4), 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605200408

37.

Levine

E. L.

Wexler

E. M.

(1981). P.L. 94-142: An act of Congress. Macmillan.

38.

Library of Congress. (2019). Thomas Jefferson. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/jefferson/60.html

39.

Markelz

A. M.

Bateman

D. F.

(2022). The essentials of special education law. Rowman & Littlefield.

40.

Mason-Williams

Bettini

Peyton

Harvey

Rosenberg

Sindelar

P. T.

(2020). Rethinking shortages in special education: Making good on the promise of an equal opportunity for students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419880352

41.

McColl

(2005). Tough call: Is No Child Left Behind constitutional? Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508600810

42.

McDonnell

L. M.

(2005). No Child Left Behind and the federal role in education: Evolution or revolution? Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930pje8002_2

43.

McNeil

Klein

(2011, September). Obama offers waivers from key provisions of NCLB. Education Week.

44.

Mills

J. I.

(2008). A legislative overview of No Child Left Behind. In Berry

Eddy

R. M.

(Eds.), Consequences of No Child Left Behind for educational evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation (vol. 117, pp. 9–20). Jossey-Bass.

45.

Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia, 348 F. Supp. 866. (DCC 1972).

46.

National Assessment of Educational Progress [NAEP]. (2021). Long-term trend assessment results: Reading and mathematics. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ltt/?age=9

47.

National Council on Disability. (2015, November). NCD statement on the 40th anniversary of IDEA. https://ncd.gov/newsroom/2015/ncd-statement-40th-anniversary-idea

48.

Neumann

R. A.

(1994). Reconsidering emergency teaching certificates and alternative certification programs as responses to teacher shortages. Urban Education, 29(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085994029001007

49.

Nixon

(1972, March). Special message to the congress on equal educational opportunities and school busing. Archived by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley of The American Presidency Project. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/255189

50.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 30 Stat. 750. (2001).

51.

No Child Left Behind: Early lessons from state flexibility waivers, U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, 113th Cong. (2013). (testimony of Arne Duncan). https://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/no-child-left-behind-early-lessons-state-flexibility-waivers

52.

Obama

(2010, March). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act. Forward. https://www.ets.org/s/education_topics/ESEA_Blueprint.pdf

53.

Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 343 F.Supp. 279. (E.D. Pennsylvania 1971).

54.

Peyton

D. J.

Acosta

Harvey

Pua

D. J.

Sindelar

P. T.

Mason-Williams

Dewey

Fisher

T. L.

Crews

(2020). Special education teacher shortage: Differences between high and low shortage states. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420906618

55.

Plunkett

V. R. L.

(1997). Putting the pieces together: The real challenge of Improving America’s Schools Act. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2(2), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr0202_2

56.

Plyer v. Doe, 357 U.S. 202. (1982).

57.

Ravitch

(1990, January 10). Education in the 1980’s: A concern for “quality” promising education trends offer a foundation for growth. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/1990/01/10/09200009.h09.html

58.

Renee v. Duncan, 686 F.3d 1002. (9th Cir. 2012).

59.

Sablik

(2013, November). Recession of 1981–82. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/recession-of-1981-82

60.

San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1. (1973).

61.

Saultz

White

R. S.

Mceachin

Fusarelli

L. D.

Fusarelli

B. C.

(2017). Teacher quality, distribution, and equity in ESSA. Journal of School Leadership, 27(5), 652–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461702700503

62.

Serrano v. Priest, 5 Cal.3d 584, 487 P.2d 1242, 96 Cal. Rptr. 601. (1971).

63.

Stallings

D. T.

(2002). A brief history of the United States Department of Education: 1979-2002. Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University. https://childandfamilypolicy.duke.edu/pdfs/pubpres/BriefHistoryofUS_DOE.pdf

64.

Strauss

. (2013, August). How the public is deceived about “highly qualified teachers.” The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2013/08/27/how-the-public-is-deceived-about-highly-qualified-teachers/

65.

Sunderman

G. L.

Orfield

(2006). The unraveling of No Child Left Behind: How negotiated changes transform the law. The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490859.pdf

66.

The LBJ Library. (2019). Johnson’s remarks on signing the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. http://www.lbjlibrary.org/lyndon-baines-johnson/timeline/johnsons-remarks-on-signing-the-elementary-and-secondary-education-act

67.

Tindal

Anderson

(2019). Changes in status and performance over time for students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 42(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718806660

68.

U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). A new education law. https://www.ed.gov/essa?src=policy

69.

U.S. Department of Education. (1983, April 26). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. https://edreform.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/A_Nation_At_Risk_1983.pdf

70.

U.S. Department of Education. (1995, September). The Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994: Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-bill/1513

71.

U.S. Department of Education. (2000, September). The new teacher’s guide to the U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/PDFDocs/tchguide.pdf

72.

U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality.

73.

U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Evaluation of title I accountability systems and school improvement efforts (TASSIE): First-year findings.

74.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Teacher quality under NCLB: Final report. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/teaching/nclb-final/report.pdf

75.

U.S. Department of Education. (2013, February). For each and every child: A strategy for education equity and excellence. The Equity and Excellence Commission. https://oese.ed.gov/resources/oese-technical-assistance-centers/state-support-network/resources/every-child-strategy-education-equity-excellence/

76.

U.S. Department of Education. (2020, November). A history of the individuals with disabilities education act. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/IDEA-History

77.

Van Duyn v. Baker School District, F.3d 811, 815. (9th Cir. 2007).

78.

Warren

., & Supreme Court of The United States. (1953). U.S. reports: Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483. Periodical. https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep347483/

79.

Yell

M. L.

(2019). The law and special education. Pearson Education.

80.

Yell

M. L.

Drasgow

(2008). What every teacher should know about No Child Left Behind: A guide for professionals (2nd ed.). Pearson.