DEI stands for diversity, equity, and inclusion, a social movement for promoting fair treatment and full participation in education and employment. Our comments are focused on how DEI might be interpreted and implemented in the context of special education’s primary U.S. legal guide, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). We concentrate on the meanings of diversity, equity, and inclusion as they apply to policies regarding the education of individuals with disabilities. We argue that policies related to DEI deserve careful scrutiny as they apply to special education. Hewing to the notion of disability as a particular kind of diversity defined by the IDEA is essential to achieving an appropriate and equitable education and the most meaningful type of inclusion for children with disabilities.
AnastasiouD.BurkeM. D.WileyA. L.KauffmanJ. M. (2024). The Telos of special education: A tripartite approach. Exceptionality, 32(2), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2024.2301819
BatemanB. D. (2017). Individual education programs for children with disabilities. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P.PullenP. C. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 87–104). Routledge.
4.
BatemanB. D.LindenM. A. (2012). Better IEPs (5th ed.). Attainment.
CassidyL.ReggioK.ShaywitzB. A.ShaywitzS. E. (2023). Prevalence of undiagnosed dyslexia in African-American primary school children. npj Science of Learning, 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00204-8
7.
ColleyA.TilburyJ. (2022). Enhancing wellbeing and independence for young people with profound and multiple learning difficulties: Lives lived well. Routledge.
8.
CrockettJ. B.KauffmanJ. M. (1999). The least restrictive environment: Its origins and interpretations in special education. Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
CrockettJ. B.KauffmanJ. M. (2001). The concept of the least restrictive environment and learning disabilities: Least restrictive of what? Reflections on Cruickshank’s 1977 guest editorial for the Journal of Learning Disabilities. In HallahanD. P.KeoghB. K. (Eds.) Research and global perspectives in learning disabilities: Essays in honor of William M. Cruickshank (pp. 147–166). Lawrence Erlbaum.
FuchsD.MirowitzH. C.GilbertJ. K. (2022). Exploring the truth of Michael Yudin’s claim: The more time students with disabilities spend in general classrooms the better they do academically. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 33(4), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221097713
14.
Gordon-GouldP.HornbyG. (2023). Inclusion at the crossroads: Exploring effective special needs provision in global contexts. Routledge.
HallahanD. P.PullenP. C.KauffmanJ. M. (2023). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
17.
HardenK. P. (2021). The genetic lottery: Why DNA matters for social equality. Princeton University Press.
18.
HornbyG.KauffmanJ. M. (2023). Special education’s zombies and their consequences. Support for Learning, 38(3), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12451
19.
Horner-JohnsonW. (2021). Disability, intersectionality, and inequity: Life at the margins. In LollarD. J.Horner-JohnsonD. W.Froehlich-GrobeK. (Eds.), Public health perspectives on disability (pp. 91–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0888-3_4
20.
ImrayP.ColleyA. (2017). Inclusion is dead: Long live inclusion. Routledge.
21.
IyerA. (2022). Understanding advantaged groups’ opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies: The role of perceived threat. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12666
22.
KauffmanJ. M. (2022). This one, not that one: Toward revitalizing special education. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), Revitalizing special education: Revolution, devolution, and evolution (pp. 1–41). Emerald.
23.
KauffmanJ. M. (2024). Review of The Teachers. Rethinking Behavior, 7(2), 48–49.
24.
KauffmanJ. M. (2025). What “all” means. In BanksJ. (Ed.), Conversations and key debates in inclusive and special education: Global insights from “The Inclusion Dialogue (1st edn. pp. 1–156).” Taylor & Francis.
KauffmanJ. M.BadarJ. (2014). Instruction, not inclusion, should be the central issue in special education: An alternative view from the USA. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 17, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.9782/2159-4341-17.1.13
KauffmanJ. M.BadarJ. (2020). Definitions and other issues. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), On educational inclusion: Meanings, history, issues and international perspectives (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
29.
KauffmanJ. M.BadarJ.WileyA. L.AnastasiouD.KoranJ. (2022). Uncertainty in education: Policy implications. Journal of Education, 104(1), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574221090283
30.
KauffmanJ. M.BurkeM. D.AnastasiouD. (2022). Hard LRE choices in the era of inclusion: Rights and their implications. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 34(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221113074
SleeR. (2018a). Defining the scope of inclusive education: Think piece prepared for the 2020 Global education monitoring report, Inclusion and education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265773
39.
SleeR. (2018b). Inclusive education isn’t dead, it just smells funny. Routledge.
40.
ThomasG.MacnabN. (2022). Intersectionality, diversity, community and inclusion: Untangling the knots. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1645892
41.
WarnockM. (2005). Special educational needs: A new look (Impact No. 11). Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
42.
WileyA. L.DavidD. (2024). Multi-tiered systems of support in special education reform: A critical appraisal. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P.PullenP. C. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (3rd ed., pp. 23–38). Routledge.
43.
WileyA. L.HarkerB.McCollumT. (2022). Veil of tiers or happy tiers? Revitalizing special education in an age of multi-tiered systems of support. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), Revitalizing special education: Revolution, devolution, and evolution (pp. 121–141). Emerald.
YellM. L.KatsiyannisA. (2024). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: School district’s obligations under the law. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P.PullenP. C. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 177–195). Routledge.
46.
YellM. L.PrinceA. T. (2022). Why the continuum of alternative placements is essential. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), Revitalizing special education: Revolution, devolution, and evolution (pp. 59–78). Emerald.
