The Plurinational State of Bolivia has experienced significant social changes with a growing commitment toward policies that favor vulnerable populations. Acknowledging movements led by people with disabilities to promote progress in social policies is a crucial task. The public sector has responded to the demands and needs of this population through recognition and promotion of their rights. Nevertheless, to ensure progress, we must support the voices of the stakeholders and promote their participation in identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the system, and the real needs and demands of people with disabilities in Bolivia. To this end, in this study, we gathered statements of key informants, using a focus group technique. The results of the data analysis indicate an increase in social awareness and recognition of the needs of this collective and the importance of their full inclusion in society. However, there is a distortion in the application of certain assistance and inclusion policies in favor of people with disabilities because these policies do not have their intended impact.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD.WoodW. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 219–277. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516085
2.
AparicioM. (2016). Estigmatización, invisibilización y cosificación de las personas con diversidad funcional. Una aproximación desde la justicia como reconocimiento de Axel Honneth [Stigmatization, invisibility and reification of people with functional diversity. An approach from justice in recognition of Axel Honneth]. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 4(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.5569/2340-5104.04.01.10
3.
ArrietaR. A. (2017). El enfoque de las capacidades y la teoría del reconocimiento como marco para la fundamentación de los derechos de las personas con discapacidad [Capability approach and theory of recognition as a framework for the foundation of the rights of persons with disabilities] [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. https://bit.ly/2ZLIMMz
4.
BarnesC.MercerG.ShakespeareT. (1997). Exploring disability. A sociological introduction. Polity Press.
5.
BarrosoJ. L. (2018). Mercado de trabajo y discapacidad: Evidencias de un experimento de campo en Bolivia [Labor market and disability: Evidence of a field experiment in Bolivia]. Revista de Análisis del Banco Central de Bolivia, 29(1), 53–82. https://ideas.repec.org/a/blv/journl/v29y2018i1p53-82.html
6.
BartonL. (2006). Overcoming disabling barriers: 18 years of disability and society. Routledge.
BuellS. (2013). A perspective from Bolivia on the implications of the world report on disability for people with communication disabilities. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.729611
10.
CapriC.AbrahamsL.McKenzieJ.CoetzeeO.MkabileS.SaptouwM.HooperA.SmithP.AdnamsC.SwartzL. (2018). Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us?African Journal of Disability, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.396
11.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2017). Brechas, ejes y desafíos en el vínculo entre lo social y lo productivo [Gaps, main concepts and challenges in the relation between social and productive matters] (LC/CDS.2/3/-*). https://bit.ly/32FyOyh
12.
Díaz-AristizábalU.Sanz-VictoriaS.Sahonero-DazaM.Ledesma-OcampoS.Cachimuel-VinuezaM.TorricoM. (2012). Reflexiones sobre la estrategia de rehabilitación basada en la comunidad (RBC): La experiencia de un programa de RBC en Bolivia [Reflections on the community-based rehabilitation (CBR) strategy: The experience of a CBR program in Bolivia]. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 17(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000100019
13.
EspondaJ.AguilarP.ParraP.ReyesA.SantanaC. (2017). Estudio sobre el estado de la implementación del artículo 24 de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad en países de la Red Intergubernamental Iberoamericana de Cooperación de Personas con Necesidades Educactivas Especiales (RIINEE) [Study on the state of the application of Article 24 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the countries from the Ibero-American Intergovernmental Network of Cooperation of People with Special Educational Needs (RIINEE)]. Fundación Henry Dunant. https://bit.ly/2Ecjxvm
14.
FaundesC.GaeteA. (2016). El levantamiento del pueblo en Bolivia bajo la consigna de la justicia social 1986-2009 [The uprising of the people of Bolivia under the slogan of social justice 1986–2009]. Prisma Social, 16, 495–555. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/1265
15.
FerreiraM. A. V. (2008). A sociological approach to disability based on the social model: Some characteriological sketches. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 124, 141–174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40184909
16.
FuentesV.García-DomingoM.Martín-CanoM. C.De la FuenteY. (2021). Concepción de partida y prácticas profesionales de atención a la discapacidad en Bolivia [Initial conception and professional practices of disability care in Bolivia]. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 10(1), 58–81. http://ried.unizar.es/public/abstracts/concepciondepartida.pdf
17.
García-CalventeM. M.Mateo-RodríguezI. (2000). El grupo focal como técnica de investigación cualitativa en salud: Diseño y puesta en práctica [Focus group as a qualitative research technique in health: Design and implementation]. Atención Primaria, 25(3), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6567(00)78485-X
18.
GómezA. (2010). La discapacidad en Bolivia y sus tendencias [Disability in Bolivia and its trends]. Con-Ciencias Sociales, 83–92. https://bit.ly/3mH4ScL
19.
GroceN. (2013). Ethics and disability research in southern contexts: Unexplored terrain, unresolved tension. BAICE Thematic Forum, University of Cambridge.
20.
Guzmán-SuárezO. (2013). Certificación de discapacidad como herramienta para la accesibilidad a derechos e inclusión social [Certification of disability as a toool for accessing to rights and social inclusion]. Revista de Salud Pública, 15(1), 149–157. https://bit.ly/2FYRuQl
LineraA. (2005). Sociologia de los movimientos sociales en Bolivia. Estructura de movilización, repertories culturales y acción política [Sociology of social movements in Bolivia. Mobilization structures, cultural repertories and political action]. Plural.
25.
Martí i PuigS.BastidasC. (2012). ¿Ha cambiado la protesta? la coyuntura actual de movilizaciones en Bolivia y Ecuador [Have protests changed? Current political mobilization in Bolivia and Ecuador]. Iconos—Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 44, 19–33. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4021979
MukhopadhyayS.MoswelaE. (2019). Disability rights in Botswana: Perspectives of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 31(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207319871745
30.
OliverM. (1996). Understanding disability. From theory to practice. Macmillan.
31.
Organización Iberoaméricana de Seguridad Social. (2014). Medidas para la promoción del empleo de personas con discapacidad en Iberoamérica [Action plan for the promotion of employment of people with disabilities in Ibero-America]. Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo. https://bit.ly/34GOVuY
32.
PastorN. (2019). Reservations to the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 37, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.37.08
33.
Rodríguez-MedinaJ.AriasV.JiménezM.Rodríguez-NavarroH.RubíaB.AriasB. (2018). La estructura de las actitudes hacia las personas con discapacidad: Modelos de redes y modelos estructurales [The structure of attitudes towards people with disabilities: Network models and structural models]. Siglo Cero: Revista Española Sobre Discapacidad Intelectual, 49(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.14201/scero20184916987
34.
RussellM. (2008). Lo que no pueden hacer los derechos civiles en el ámbito de la discapacidad: Empleo y economía política [What civil rights cannot do in the field of disability: Employment and political economy]. In L.Barton (Comp.), Superar las barreras de la discapacidad (pp. 245–268). Morata.
35.
ShakespeareT. (2008). La autoorganización de las personas con discapacidad. ¿Un nuevo movimiento social [Disabled people’s self-organisation: A new social movement?] In L.Barton (Comp.), Superar las barreras de la discapacidad (pp. 68–85). Morata.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). América Latina y el Caribe: revisión regional 2015 de la Educación para Todos [Latin America and the Caribbean: 2015 general review on education for all]. Organización de las Naciones Unidas. https://bit.ly/3lCGAQ1
