This article reviews and compares disability benefit systems in nine countries—Australia, Germany, Great Britain, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Sweden, and the United States. It focuses on temporary and partial disability benefit programs and on how such programs may help return persons with disabilities to work. An analysis of the general advantages and disadvantages of temporary and partial disability programs is presented. Specific concerns if such programs were to be implemented in the United States are addressed. Time-limited programs seem to have the potential to improve return to work among persons with disabilities and reduce program costs. Caution is needed in adopting such a program, as implementation would be complex and the employment outcomes of recently adopted time-limited programs overseas are yet to be evaluated. In contrast, the study found that partial disability benefit programs are complex to administer and appear to offer little potential to encourage return to work.
Autor, D.H., & Duggan, M.G. (2003). The rise in the disability rolls and the decline in unemployment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 157-206.
2.
Barnhart, J.A. (2003, September). Statement of the Honorable Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, House Committee on Ways and Means.
3.
Browning, E.K. (1995). Effects of the Earned Income Tax Credit on income and welfare. National Tax Journal, 48, 23-43.
4.
Burkhauser, R.V., & Daly, M. (1998). Disability and work: The experience of American and German men. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, Issue 2.
5.
Burkhauser, R.V., Glenn, A.J., & Wittenburg, D.C. (1996). Encouraging work through cash benefits policy: The disabled worker tax credit. In V. P. Reno, J. L. Mashaw, & B. Gradison (Eds.), Disability: Challenges for social insurance, health care financing and labor market policy (pp. 47-65). Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance.
6.
Government Accountability Office. (1988). Social Security disability: Implementing the Medical Improvement Review Standard (Briefing report to the chairman, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives; Rep. No. GAO/HRD-88-108BR). Washington, DC: Author.
7.
Government Accountability Office. (1993). Social Security: SSA's processing of continuing disability reviews (Report to the chairman, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate; Rep. No. GAO/T-HRD-93-9) . Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Government Accountability Office. (2004). Disability insurance: SSA should strengthen its efforts to detect and prevent overpayments (Rep. No. GAO-04-929). Washington, DC: Author.
9.
Graetz, M.J. (1996). Encouraging work through cash benefits policy . In V. P. Reno, J. L. Mashaw, & B. Gradison (Eds.), Disability: Challenges for social insurance, health care financing and labor market policy (pp. 66-70). Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance.
10.
Honeycutt, T.C. (2004). Program and benefit paths to the Social Security Disability Insurance program. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation , 21, 83-94.
11.
Honeycutt, T., & Mitra, S. (Eds.). (2005). Learning from others: Temporary and partial disability programs in nine countries (Disability Research Institute working paper). Retrieved January 8, 2007, from http://dri.uiuc.edu/research/p04-12h/learning_final_report.pdf
12.
Hotchkiss, J.L. (2003). The labor market experience of workers with disabilities: The ADA and beyond. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.
13.
Kruse, D., & Schur, L. (2002). Non-standard work arrangements and disability income (Report to the Disability Research Institute, University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign).
14.
Mitra, S. (2005). Introduction and overview. In T. Honeycutt & S. Mitra (Eds.), Learning from others: Temporary and partial disability programs in nine countries (pp. 1-37). Retrieved January 8, 2007, from http://dri.uiuc.edu/research/p04-12h/learning_final_report.pdf
15.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Social expenditure database. Paris: Author.
16.
Prinz, C. (Ed.). (2003). European disability pension policies: Eleven country trends 1970-2002. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
17.
Scholz, J.K. (1994). The Earned Income Tax Credit: Participation, compliance, and antipoverty effectiveness. National Tax Journal, 47, 67-83.
18.
Scholz, J.K. (1996). In-work benefits in the United States: The Earned Income Tax Credit. Economic Journal, 106, 156-169.
19.
Schur, L. (2002). Dead-end jobs or a path to economic well-being? The consequences of non-standard work for people with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 601-620.
20.
Schur, L. (2003). Barriers or opportunities? The causes of contingent and part-time work among people with disabilities. Industrial Relations, 42, 589-622.
21.
Social Security Administration. (1990). Annual statistical supplement of the Social Security Bulletin. Baltimore, MD: Social Security Administration Office of Policy and Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics.
22.
Social Security Administration. (2003a). Annual statistical supplement of the Social Security Bulletin. Baltimore, MD: Social Security Administration Office of Policy and Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics.
23.
Social Security Administration. (2003b). Annual statistical report on the Social Security Disability Insurance Program . Baltimore, MD: Social Security Administration Office of Policy and Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics .
24.
Social Security Advisory Board. (2006, September). A disability system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
Yelin, E. (1997). The employment of people with and without disabilities in an age of insecurity. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 549, 117-128.
