Although parent involvement is a cornerstone of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), few individual parents of children with disabilities participate in civic engagement to voice their suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization. To address this gap, a civic engagement training was conducted with 95 parents of children with disabilities across four states. At the end of the training, participants completed videotaped testimonials voicing their suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization. Participant suggestions clustered around three themes: expanding IDEA to address specific concerns; adding text to provide specificity and clarity in IDEA; and implementing the current version of IDEA. Implications for research and policy are discussed.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
2.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
3.
BurkeM. M.SandmanL. (2014). In the voices of parents: Suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 40, 71–85.
4.
BurkeM. M.SandmanL.PerezB.O’LearyM. (2018). The phenomenon of legislative advocacy among parents of children with disabilities. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 18, 50–58.
5.
ChoS.GannottiM. E. (2005). Korean-American mothers’ perception of professional support in early intervention and special education programs. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 2(1), 1–9.
6.
CohenS. R. (2013). Advocacy for the “abandonados”: Harnessing cultural beliefs for Latino families and their children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 10, 71–78.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
8.
EmersonE. (2007). Poverty and people with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disability Research Reviews, 13, 107–113.
GeenenS.PowersL. E.Lopez-VasquezA. (2001). Multicultural aspects of parent involvement in transition planning. Exceptional Children, 67, 265–282.
11.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
12.
GoldmanS. E.BurkeM. M. (2017). The effectiveness of interventions to increase parent involvement in special education: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Exceptionality, 25, 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196444
13.
HarrJ. J. (2000). The 1997 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: “Making a good law better”: How federal bureaucracy became involved in the legislative process. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 11, 111–119.
14.
KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.AchillesG. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217–226.
15.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
16.
MagañaS.LopezK.AguinagaA.MortonH. (2013). Access to diagnosis and treatment services among Latino children with autism spectrum disorders. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.3.141
17.
MuellerT. G.CarranzaF. (2011). An examination of special education due process hearings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22, 131–139.
18.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. SAGE.
19.
PickettS. A.CookJ. A.HellerT. (1998). Support group satisfaction: A comparison of minority and white families. In LefleyH. P. (Ed.), Families coping with mental illness: The cultural context: New directions for mental health services (pp. 63–73). Jossey-Bass.
20.
Povenmire-KirkT. C.LindstromL.BullisM. (2010). De escuela a la vida adulta/from school to adult life: Transition needs for Latino youth with disabilities and their families. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 41–51.
21.
RossettiZ.RedashA.SauerJ. S.BuiO.WenY.RegensburgerD. (2018). Access, accountability, and advocacy: Culturally and linguistically diverse families’ participation in IEP meetings. Exceptionality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2018.1480948
TurnbullA. A.TurnbullH. R.ErwinE. J.SoodakL. C.ShogrenK. A. (2011). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnership and trust. Pearson.
24.
TurnbullH. R.ShogrenK. A.TurnbullA. P. (2011). Evolution of the parent movement: Past, present and future. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 639–653). Routledge.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Reha-bilitative Services, & Office of Special Education Programs. (2018). 40th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
27.
VanegasS. B.AbdelrahimR. (2016). Characterizing the systems of support for families of children with disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Family Social Work, 19(4), 286–327.
28.
WalshN. R.KurianskyJ. (2009). Psychologists get involved at the national level: Grassroots lobbying on Capitol Hill. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 131–135.
29.
WrightA. C.TaylorS. (2014). Advocacy by parents of young children with special needs: Activities, processes, and perceived effectiveness. Journal of Social Service Research, 40(5), 591–605.
30.
YorkL.A. (2005). Descriptive analysis of comments obtained during the process of regulating the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 [Unpublished dissertation]. University of North Texas.
