Medicaid Waiver Adoption for Youth With Complex Behavioral Health Care Needs: An Analysis of State Decision-Making

Abstract

Many states have enacted Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Medicaid waivers, which waive or expand Medicaid means tests to increase access to community-based public mental health services for youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance (SED). This study sought to understand key factors in State Mental Health Authorities and Medicaid Agency decision-making in adopting Medicaid waivers for youth with SED. Using purposive sampling to collect data through semi-structured interviews with officials from 37 state mental health systems, interviews focused on fiscal, historical, and political reasons for states’ adoption or rejection of Medicaid waivers to serve youth with SED. Results suggest that decisions around waiver adoption relate to the size and flexibility of state budgets, the sufficiency of existing public HCBS funding and services, political prioritization of children and families, states’ desire to move away from a reliance on residential care, and ideology related to the role of the state in providing for the welfare of children and families. Advocacy efforts promoting state waiver adoption can address apprehensions about budget constraints and providing financial assistance to non-poor families by emphasizing potential cost savings from residential diversion and ethical imperatives to keep children in their homes and communities.

Keywords

emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD)families Medicare/Medicaid long-term care mental health politics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey

B. C.

Davis

T. S.

(2012). Mental health parity legislation: Implications for children and youth with serious emotional disturbance. Social Work in Mental Health, 10(1), 12–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2011.609776

Barry

C. L.

Busch

S. H.

(2008). Caring for children with mental disorders: Do state parity laws increase access to treatment? Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 11(2), 57–66.

Barth

Greenson

Guo

Green

Sisson

(2007). Outcomes for youth receiving intensive in-home therapy or residential care: A comparison using propensity scores. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.497

Callaghan

Jacobs

L. R.

(2015). Interest group conflict over Medicaid expansion: The surprising impact of public advocates. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302943

Dishion

T. J.

McCord

Poulin

(1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54(9), 755–764.

Friesen

B. J.

Giliberti

Katz-Leavy

Osher

Pullmann

M. D.

(2003). Research in the service of policy change: The “custody problem.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342660301100106

Garcia

A. R.

Metraux

Chen

C. C.

Park

J. M.

Culhane

D. P.

Furstenberg

F. F.

(2018) Patterns of multisystem service use and school dropout among seventh-, eighth-, and ninth-grade students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(8) 1041–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617714329.

Graaf

Snowden

(2017). The role of Medicaid home and community-based service policies in organizing and financing care for children with severe emotional disturbance. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.007

Graaf

Snowden

(2018). Medicaid waivers and public sector mental health service penetration rates for youth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 88(5), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000295

10.

Grogan

C. M.

(1994). Political-economic factors influencing state Medicaid policy. Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), 589–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299404700303

11.

Hansen

Litzelman

Marsh

D. T

Milspaw

(2004). Approaches to serious emotional disturbance: Involving multiple systems. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(5): 457–465. Retrieved October 2004 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.35.5.457

12.

Hoagwood

Cunningham

(1992). Outcomes of children with emotional disturbance in residential treatment for educational purposes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321281

13.

Howell

E. M.

(2004). Access to children’s mental health services under Medicaid and SCHIP [Text]. Urban Institute. http://webarchive.urban.org/publications/311053.html

14.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990).

15.

Ireys

H. T.

Pires

Lee

(2006). Public financing of home and community services for children and youth with serious emotional disturbances: Selected state strategies. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/public-financing-home-and-community-services-children-and-youth-serious-emotional-disturbances-selected-state-strategies

16.

Jacobs

L. R.

Callaghan

(2013). Why states expand Medicaid: Party, resources, and history. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 38(5), 1023–1050. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2334889

17.

Jacoby

W. G.

Schneider

S. K.

(2001). Variability in state policy priorities: An empirical analysis. Journal of Politics, 63(2), 544–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00078

18.

Kuo

D. Z.

Cohen

Agrawal

Berry

J. G.

Casey

P. H.

(2011). A national profile of caregiver challenges among more medically complex children with special health care needs. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 165(11), 1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.172

19.

(2017). Child and adolescent mental disorders and health care disparities: Results from the National Survey of Children’s Health, 2011–2012. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 28(3), 988–1011.

20.

Lukens

(2014). State variation in health care spending and the politics of state Medicaid policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 39(6), 1213–1251. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2822634

21.

Lutterman

Ganju

Schacht

Shaw

Monihan

, et al. “Sixteen State Study on Performance Measures.” Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2003. http://psbqi.dmh.lacounty.gov/QI/Report_Final/Sixteen%20State%20Study%20on%20Mental%20Health%20Performance%20Measures%202003.pdf.

22.

Mann

Cindy

Hyde

Pamela S.

“Coverage of Behavioral Health Services for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Significant Mental Health Conditions.” Joint CMCS and SAMHSA Informational Bulletin, 2013. http://www.conference.ffcmh.org/sites/default/files/CIB-05-07-2013.pdf.

23.

Mark

T. L.

Buck

J. A

. (2006). Characteristics of U.S. youths with serious emotional disturbance: Data from the National Health Interview Survey. Psychiatric Services, 57(11), 1573–1578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.11.1573

24.

Merryman

M. B.

Miller

N. A.

Shockley

Eskow

K. G.

Chasson

G. S.

(2015). State adoption of Medicaid 1915(c) waivers for children and youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Disability and Health Journal, 8(3), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.03.003

25.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

26.

Molin

Palmer

(2005). Consent and participation: Ethical issues in the treatment of children in out-of-home care. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(1), 152–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.75.1.152

27.

Newacheck

P. W.

Kim

S. E.

(2005). A national profile of health care utilization and expenditures for children with special health care needs. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.1.10

28.

Pumariega

A. J.

(2007). Residential treatment for children and youth: Time for reconsideration and reform. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77(3), 343–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.77.3.343

29.

Ringel

J. S.

Sturm

(2001). National estimates of mental health utilization and expenditures for children in 1998. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 28(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287247

30.

Saldaña

(2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (Social Research H62 .S343 2013). SAGE.

31.

Sharrock

P. J.

Dollard

Armstrong

M. I.

Rohrer

(2013). Provider perspectives on involving families in children’s residential psychiatric care. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 30(1), 40–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2013.751807

32.

Shepperd

Doll

Gowers

James

Fazel

Fitzpatrick

Pollock

(2009). Alternatives to inpatient mental health care for children and young people. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009, Article CD006410. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006410.pub2

33.

Snyder

Marton

McLaren

Feng

Zhou

(2017). Do high fidelity wraparound services for youth with serious emotional disturbances save money in the long-term? The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 20(4), 167–175.

34.

Solhkhah

Passman

C. L.

Lavezzi

Zoffness

R. J.

Silva

R. R.

(2007). Effectiveness of a children’s home and community-based services waiver program. Psychiatric Quarterly, 78(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-007-9042-2

35.

Souverein

F. A.

Van der Helm

G. H. P.

Stams

G. J. J. M

. (2013). “Nothing works” in secure residential youth care? Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 1941–1945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.010

36.

Stroul

Beth A.

Friedman

Robert M.

“A System of Care for Severely Emotionally Disturbed Children & Youth.” Washington, DC: CASSP Technical Assistance Center, Georgetown University Child Development Center, 1986. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED330167.

37.

Stroul

B. A.

Manley

(2018, March). Custody relinquishment to obtain children’s behavioral health services: Current findings and strategies to address the practice [Conference session]. Presented at the 31st Annual Research & Policy Conference on Child, Adolescent, and Young Adult Behavioral Health, Tampa, FL, United States. https://nmcdn.io/e186d21f8c7946a19faed23c3da2f0da/5ef2e685c81348acbb22d12524a5a4be/files/15E1-B-Stroul.pdf

38.

Urdapilleta

Kim

Wang

Howard

Varghese

Waterman

. . . Palmisano

(2013). National evaluation of the Medicaid demonstration waiver home- and community-based alternatives to psychiatric residential treatment facilities [Submitted to Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Contract Number: HHSM-500-2006-00007I, Task Order #2 Final Evaluation Report]. IMPAQ International. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-information/by-topics/delivery-systems/downloads/cba-evaluation-final.pdf

39.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2003). Child welfare and juvenile justice: Several factors influence the placement of children solely to obtain mental health services [Testimony before the committee on governmental affairs, U.S. Senate. Statement of Cornelia M. Ashby]. http://www.gao.gov/index.html

40.

Hoven

C. W.

Liu

Fuller

C. J.

Fan

Musa

Wicks

Mandell

Cook

J. A.

(2008). The relationship between depressive symptom levels and subsequent increases in substance use among youth with severe emotional disturbance. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69(4), 520–527.