Education Federalism and Minority Disproportionate Representation Monitoring: Examining IDEA Provisions,Regulations,and Judicial Trends

Abstract

States have been granted increasingly greater agency both to determine standards for minority disproportionate representation (MDR) monitoring in special education placements and to set the relevant cutoffs and sanctions when significant disproportionality is found. State authority has been bolstered by an education federalism framework, case law, and updated legislative and regulatory guidance under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Using legislative and judicial analysis to both examine education federalism and its impact on state and federal authority and analyze the legislative history associated with MDR monitoring and recent judicial trends within federal case law regarding equal protection constitutional challenges brought by plaintiff parents and students with disabilities in MDR litigation, this article finds that states are increasingly granted greater authority from judicial opinions and policy to monitor states’ practices. Legal and policy implications for stakeholders (e.g., parents, students, school districts) are also discussed.

Keywords

disproportionate representation minority students special education policy federalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahram

Fergus

Noguera

(2011). Addressing racial/ethnic disproportionality in special education: Case studies of suburban school districts. Teachers College Record, 113, 2233–2266.

Albrecht

S. F.

Skiba

R. J.

Losen

D. J.

Chung

C. G.

Middelberg

(2012). Federal policy on disproportionality in special education: Is it moving us forward? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 14–25. doi:10.1177/1044207311407917

Allston v. Lower Merion School District, 135 S. Ct. 1738 (2015).

Blunt v. Lower Merion School District, 559 F. Supp. 2d. 548 (E.D. Pa. 2008).

Blunt v. Lower Merion School District, 262 F.R.D. 481 (E.D. Pa. 2009).

Blunt v. Lower Merion School District, 826 F. Supp. 2d. 749 (E.D. Pa. 2011).

Blunt v. Lower Merion School District, 767 F.3d 247 (3d Cir. 2014).

Bollmer

Bethel

Munk

Bitterman

(2014). Methods for assessing racial/ethnic disproportionality in special education: A technical assistance guide (revised). Rockville, MD: Westat.

Cavendish

Artiles

A. J.

Harry

(2015). Tracking inequality 60 years after Brown: Does policy legitimize the racialization of disability? Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 14(2), 30–40.

10.

Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C § 1983 (1996).

11.

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2009).

12.

Council of Parent Attorneys & Advocates, Inc. v. Devos, 2019 WL 1082162 (D.D.C. 2019).

13.

De Valenzuela

J. S.

Copeland

S. R.

C. H.

Park

. (2006). Examining educational equity: Revisiting the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Exceptional Children, 72, 425–441.

14.

Donovan

Cross

C. T.

(Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

15.

Dunn

L. M.

(1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.

16.

Gordon

(2017). Race, poverty, and interpreting overrepresentation in special education. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/race-poverty-and-interpreting-overrepresentation-in-special-education/

17.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1997).

18.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 34 C.F.R. 300.1 et seq. (2004).

19.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).

20.

Individuals with Disabilities Education, Pub. L.No. 105-17, 111 Stat. 37 et seq. (1997).

21.

Leslie v. Board of Education for Illinois School District U-46, 379 F. Supp. 2d 952 (N.D. Ill. 2005).

22.

Malen

(2003). Tightening the grip? The impact of state activism on local school systems. Educational Policy, 17, 195–216. doi:10.1177/0895904802250736

23.

McFadden v. Board of Education for Illinois School District U-46, 984 F. Supp. 2d 882 (N.D. Ill. 2013).

24.

Morgan

P. L.

Farkas

Cook

Strassfeld

N. M.

Hillemeier

M. M.

Pun

W. H.

Schussler

D. L.

(2016). Are Black children disproportionately overrepresented in special education? A best-evidence synthesis. Exceptional Children, 83, 181–198. doi:10.1177/0014402916664042

25.

Morgan

P. L.

Farkas

Cook

Strassfeld

N. M.

Hillemeier

M. M.

Pun

W. H.

. . .Schussler

D. L.

(2018). Are Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, or language minority children over-represented in special education? Exceptional Children, 84, 261–279. doi:10.1177/0014402917748303

26.

Musgrove

(2013, December 20). Letter to Dr. Jim Delisle. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.

27.

Office of Special Education Programs. (2017). Part B State Performance Plan (SPP) and Annual Performance Report (APR): Part B indicator measurement table. Retrieved from https://osep.grads360.org/services/PDCService.svc/GETPDCDocumentFile?fileid=33309

28.

Ong-Dean

(2006). High roads and low roads: Learning disabilities in California, 1976-1998. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 91–113. doi:10.1525/sop.2006.49.191

29.

Oswald

D. P.

Coutinho

M. J.

Best

A. M.

Singh

(1999). Ethnic representation in special education, the influence of school-related and economic and demographic variables. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 194–206. doi:10.1177/002246699903200401

30.

Robinson

K. J. R.

(2015). Disrupting education federalism. Washington University Law Review, 92, 959–1018.

31.

Schapiro

R. A.

(2005). Toward a theory of interactive federalism. Iowa Law Review, 91, 243–317.

32.

Skiba

R. J.

Artiles

A. J.

Kozleski

E. B.

Losen

D. J.

Harry

(2016). Risks and consequences of oversimplifying educational inequities: A response to Morgan et al. (2015). Educational Researcher, 45, 221–225.

33.

Strassfeld

N. M.

(2017). The future of IDEA: Monitoring disproportionate representation of minority students in special education and intentional discrimination claims. Case Western Reserve University Law Review, 67(4), 1121–1151.

34.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq. (2009).

35.

U.S. Department of Education. (2014, June). Request for information on addressing significant disproportionality under Section 618(d) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-06-19/pdf/2014-14289.pdf

36.

U.S. Department of Education. (2016, December). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities: Preschool grants for children with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-12-19/pdf/2016-30190.pdf

37.

U.S. Department of Education. (2018a, February). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities; Preschool grants for children with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/02/27/2018-04102/assistance-to-states-for-the-education-of-children-with-disabilities-preschool-grants-for-children

38.

U.S. Department of Education. (2018b, July). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities; Preschool grants for children with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2018-07-03/pdf/2018-14374.pdf

39.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016, January). Fast facts: Children 3 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part B, by type of disability: Selected years, 1976-77 through 2013-14. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=64

40.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2013, February). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Standards needed to improve identification of racial and ethnic overrepresentation in special education (GAO-13-37). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-137

41.

Voulgarides

C. K.

Tefera

(2017). Reframing the racialization of disabilities in policy. Theory Into Practice, 56, 161–168. doi:10.1080/00405841.2017.1336037

42.

Zhang

Katsiyannis

Roberts

(2014). Minority representation in special education: 5-year trends. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 118–127. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9698-6