The purpose of this study was to conduct a literature review on SD and academic success of students with disabilities in postsecondary education. We reviewed 20 empirical or scientific studies published from 1972 to 2016 that explored academic experiences associated with SD and efficacy of SD trainings in postsecondary settings. Of the 20 articles, half of the studies discussed student experiences of SD; the other half identified five approaches to improving SD in postsecondary education, which included strategic content learning instruction, personal strengths program, SD learning model for instruction, self-advocacy training, and coaching. The results indicated that self-advocacy, self-awareness, problem solving, and goal setting and attainment are important traits of SD. Furthermore, related trainings (e.g., self-advocacy training and coaching services) were found to improve SD skills and encourage students to utilize disability services and support systems to achieve academic success. Implications for future research and policy follow a discussion of the results.
*AnctilT. M.IshikawaM. E.ScottA. T. (2008). Academic identity development through self-determination successful college students with learning disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 164–174. doi:10.1177/0885728808315331
2.
BaeS. J. (2007). Self-determination and academic achievement of individuals with disabilities in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence.
3.
*ButlerD. L. (1995). Promoting strategic learning by postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 170–190. doi:10.1177/002221949502800306
4.
*ButlerD. L. (1998). The strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning: A report of three studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 682–697. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.682
5.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.AlwellM. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 108–114. doi:10.1177/0885728809336654
6.
CortiellaC.HorowitzS. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities.
7.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2008). Higher Education Act reauthorization: Summary of selected provisions for individuals with exceptionalities and the professionals who work on their behalf. Retrieved from https://www.aucd.org/docs/CEC%20Higher%20Education%20Analysis.pdf
8.
DukesL. L.IIIShawS. F. (2008). Using the AHEAD program standards and performance indicators to promote Self-determination in the daily practice of Office of Disability Services. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21, 105–108.
9.
DurlakC. M.RoseE.BursuckW. D. (1994). Preparing high school students with learning disabilities for the transition to postsecondary education teaching the skills of Self-determination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 51–59. doi:10.1177/002221949402700108
10.
*FarmerJ. L.AllsoppD. H.FerronJ. M. (2015). Impact of the personal strengths program on self-determination levels of college students with LD and/or ADHD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 145–159. doi:10.1177/0731948714526998
11.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the division on career development and transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 113–128. doi:10.1177/088572889802100202
12.
FieldS.SarverM. D.ShawS. F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349. doi:10.1177/07419325030240060501
13.
*FinnD.GetzelE. E.McManusS. (2008). Adapting the self-determined learning model for instruction of college students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 85–93. doi:10.1177/0885728808318327
14.
GetzelE. E. (2014). Fostering self-determination in higher education: Identifying evidence-based practices. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27, 381–386.
15.
*GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2006). Voice of experience: What college students with learning disabilities and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders tell us are important self-determination skills for success. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 33–40.
16.
*GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of Self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 77–84. doi:10.1177/0885728808317658
17.
*HadleyW. M. (2006). L.D. students’ access to higher education: Self-advocacy and support. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(2), 10–16.
18.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 614 et seq. (2004).
19.
*JamesonD. R. (2007). Self-determination and success outcomes of two-year college students with disabilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 26–46.
20.
JanigaS.CostenbaderV. (2002). The transition from high school to postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A survey of college service coordinators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 463–470.
21.
LandmarkL. J.JuS.ZhangD. (2010). Substantiated best practices in transition: Fifteen plus years later. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 165–176. doi:10.1177/0885728810376410
22.
*LaytonC. A.LockR. H. (2003). Reasoning and self-advocacy for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(2), 49–55.
23.
MorningstarM. E.FreyB. B.NoonanP. M.NgJ.Clavenna-DeaneB.GravesP.. . . Williams-DiehmK. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the relationship of transition preparation and self-determination for students with disabilities in postsecondary educational settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 80–94. doi:10.1177/0885728809356568
24.
MullC.SitlingtonP. L.AlperS. (2001). Postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature. Exceptional Children, 68, 97–118. doi:10.1177/001440290106800106
25.
NewmanL. A.MadausJ. W. (2015). An analysis of factors related to receipt of accommodations and services by postsecondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 208–219. doi:10.1177/0741932515572912
26.
NewmanL. A.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M.ShaverD. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2010_09/nlts2_report_2010_09_complete.pdf
27.
NewmanL. A.WagnerM.KnokeyA. M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2011_09_02/nlts2_report_2011_09_02_complete.pdf
28.
*ParkerD. R.BoutelleK. (2009). Executive function coaching for college students with learning disabilities and ADHD: A new approach for fostering self-determination. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 204–215.
29.
RiccobonoJ. A.WhitmoreR. W.GabelT. J.TraccarellaM. A.PrattD. J.BerknerL. K.MalizioA. G. (1997). National Postsecondary Student Aid Study, 1995–96 (NPSAS: 96) Methodology Report (NCES 98-073). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED414341.pdf
30.
*RichmanE. L.RademacherK. N.MaitlandT. L. (2014). Coaching and college success. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27, 33–50.
31.
*RubanL. M.McCoachD. B.McGuireJ. M.ReisS. M. (2003). The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 270–286. doi:10.1177/002221940303600306
32.
*ScorgieK.KildalL.WilgoshL. (2010). Post-secondary students with disabilities: Issues related to empowerment and self-determination. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 38(1–2), 133–145.
33.
*SkinnerM. E. (2004). College students with learning disabilities speak out: What it takes to be successful in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 17, 91–104.
34.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2015). Digest of education statistics 2013 (NCES 2015-011). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015011.pdf
35.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960
36.
*ThomaC. A.GetzelE. E. (2005). “Self-determination is what it’s all about”: What post-secondary students with disabilities tell us are important considerations for success. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 234–242. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23879718
37.
TrainorA. (2002). Self-determination for students with learning disabilities: Is it a universal value?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 711–725. doi:10.1080/0951839022000014394
38.
*WalkerA. R.TestD. W. (2011). Using a self-advocacy intervention on African American college students’ ability to request academic accommodations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 134–144. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00333.x
39.
WehmeyerM. (1997). Self-determination as an educational outcome: A definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 175–209. doi:10.1023/A:1024981820074
40.
WehmeyerM. (1998). Self-determination and individuals with significant disabilities: Examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 23, 5–16.
41.
WehmeyerM. (2007). Promoting self-determination in students with developmental disabilities. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
42.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439–453. doi:10.1177/001440290006600401
43.
*WhiteG. W.SummersJ. A.ZhangE.RenaultV. (2014). Evaluating the effects of a self-advocacy training program for undergraduates with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27, 229–244.
44.
*WhiteG. W.VoY. T. H. (2006). Requesting accommodations to increase full participation in higher education: An analysis of self-advocacy training for postsecondary students with learning and other disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 41–56.
45.
ZimmermanB. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
46.
*ZwartL. M.KallemeynL. M. (2001). Peer-based coaching for college students with ADHD and learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 15(1), 1–15
