This article is dedicated to an analysis of the life trajectories of individuals with spinal cord injuries in Portugal. From a perspective that aims to understand the challenges faced in the different stages following the initial injury, it aims to relate corporeal, personal, and social impacts to medical, institutional, and political responses. Based on a total of 93 interviews, the analysis focuses on the period that starts with the event that caused the injury and extends to the present day, following the entire rehabilitation and integration process and identifying key structures, services, and institutions. In offering a critical reading of processes and structures that are capable of ensuring quality of life and social inclusion for persons with spinal cord injuries, it broadens the discussion to reveal the social exclusion widely experienced by persons with disabilities in Portugal.
DavisL. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness and the body. London, England: Verso.
5.
FontesF. (2009). Pessoas com deficiência e políticas sociais em Portugal: Da caridade à cidadania social [People with disabilities and social policies in Portugal: From charity to citizenship]. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 86, 73–93. doi:10.4000/rccs.233
6.
FontesF. (2014). The Portuguese disabled people’s movement: Development, demands and outcomes. Disability & Society, 29, 1398–1411. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.934442
7.
GoffmanE. (1987). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
HahnH. C. (2002). Academic debates and political advocacy: The US disability movement. In BarnesC.OliverM.BartonL. (Eds.), Disability studies today (pp. 162–189). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers.
10.
HenriquesF. (2004). Paraplegia: Percursos de adaptação e qualidade de vida [Paraplegia. Adaptation paths and quality of life]. Coimbra, Portugal: Formasau.
11.
HughesB. (2001). Disability and the constitution of dependency. In BartonL. (Ed.), Disability, politics & the struggle for change (pp. 24–33). London, England: David Fulton Publishers.
12.
KleinS.KarpG. (2004). From there to here: Stories of adjustment to spinal cord injury. Baltimore, MD: No Limits Communications.
13.
LederD. (1990). The absent body. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
MartinsB. S. (2006). E se eu fosse cego? Narrativas silenciadas da deficiência [What if I were blind? Silenced narratives of disability]. Porto, Portugal: Afrontamento.
15.
MartinsB. S. (2008). The suffering body in the cultural representations of disability: The anguish of corporal transgression. In CampbellT.FontesF.SoorenianA.TillC. (Eds.), Disability studies: Emerging insights and perspectives (pp. 93–107). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.
16.
OliverM. (1990). The politics of disablement. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
17.
OliverM. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
18.
OliverM.ZarbG.SilverJ.MooreM.SalisburyV. (1988). Walking into darkness: The experience of spinal cord injury. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-19451-3
19.
SantosB. S. (1993). O estado, as relações salariais e o bem-estar social na semiperiferia: O caso português [State, wage relations and social welfare in the semiperiphery: The case of Portugal]. In SantosB. S. (Ed.), Portugal: Um retrato singular. Porto, Portugal: Afrontamento.
20.
SomersM. F. (2001). Spinal cord injury: Functional rehabilitation. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
StikerH. J. (1999). A history of disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22.
StoneD. A. (1984). The disabled state. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
23.
TurnerB. (1992). Regulating bodies: Essays in medical sociology. London, England: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203214183
24.
WallK.AboimS.CunhaV.VasconcelosP. (2001). Families and informal support networks in Portugal: The reproduction of inequality. Journal of European Social Policy, 11, 213–233. doi:10.1177/095892870101100302
