Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A proliferation of parent and family-oriented interventions has emerged within the field of juvenile justice, aiming to reduce youth offending through better parenting practices. While there is robust evidence for the efficacy of a few model programs, many family interventions have received less empirical attention despite mixed evidence on their efficacy. This study aims to assess the efficacy of a voluntary parenting program (Family Support Services; FSS) for parents of youth on juvenile probation in a Midwestern state over the span of 15 years (N = 1,844). Analyses reveal that after controlling for robust predictors of recidivism, FSS was not associated with a decrease in recidivism but rather youth whose parents participated in FSS were more likely to recidivate compared with youth of non-FSS parents. Further moderating analysis found that the iatrogenic association was stronger for low-risk youth.

Keywords

juvenile justice recidivism family-based interventions evidence-based practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Hoge

R. D.

(1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004

Bank

Marlowe

J. H.

Reid

J. B.

Patterson

G. R.

Weinrott

M. R.

(1991). A comparative evaluation of parent-training interventions for families of chronic delinquents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00910562

Barrett

D. E.

Katsiyannis

(2017). The Clemson Juvenile Delinquency Project: Major findings from a multi-agency study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(8), 2050–2058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0714-8

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2023). The psychology of criminal conduct (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292128

Brody

G. H.

Kogan

S. M.

Chen

Y. F.

McBride Murry

(2008). Long-term effects of the strong African American families program on youths’ conduct problems. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(5), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.016

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Caudill

J. W.

Morris

R. G.

Sayed

El Yun

DeLisi

(2013). Pathways through the juvenile justice system: Predictors of formal disposition. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204012472211

Cochran

J. C.

Mears

D. P.

(2015). Race, ethnic, and gender divides in juvenile court sanctioning and rehabilitative intervention. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(2), 181–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814560574

Drake

E. K.

Aos

Miller

M. G.

(2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612615

10.

Dropp

A. R.

(2016). Family-based treatments for serious juvenile offenders: A multilevel meta-analysis. University of Missouri.

11.

Elliott

D. S.

Mihalic

(2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013981.28071.52

12.

Fagan

A. A.

(2013). Family-focused interventions to prevent juvenile delinquency. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(4), 617–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12029

13.

Glueck

(1951). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Juvenile Court Judges Journal, 2(3), 32–34.

14.

Gottfredson

D. C.

Kearley

Thornberry

T. P.

Slothower

Devlin

Fader

J. J.

(2018). Scaling-up evidence-based programs using a public funding stream: A randomized trial of functional family therapy for court-involved youth. Prevention Science, 19(7), 939–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0936-z

15.

Greenwood

(2008). Prevention and intervention programs for juvenile offenders. Future of Children, 18(2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0018

16.

Hoeve

Dubas

J. S.

Eichelsheim

V. I.

Van Der Laan

P. H.

Smeenk

Gerris

J. R. M.

(2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(6), 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8

17.

Hoge

R. D.

Andrews

D. A.

(2002). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI): User’s manual. Multi-Health Services.

18.

Klein

N. C.

Alexander

J. F.

Parsons

B. V.

(1977). Impact of family systems intervention on recidivism and sibling delinquency: A model of primary prevention and program evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45(3), 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.45.3.469

19.

Latimer

(2001). A meta-analytic examination of youth delinquency, family treatment, and recidivism. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(2), 237–253.

20.

Leve

L. D.

Chamberlain

Kim

H. K.

(2015). Risks, outcomes, and evidence-based interventions for girls in the US juvenile justice system. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 18(3), 252–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-015-0186-6

21.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573

22.

Lipsey

M. W.

Howell

J. C.

Kelly

M. R.

Chapman

Carver

(2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs: A new perspective on evidence-based practice. Center for Juvenile Justice Reform; Georgetown Public Policy Institute.

23.

Lucero

J. L.

Barrett

Jensen

(2015). An examination of family and school factors related to early delinquency. Children and Schools, 37(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdv013

24.

Murray

Farrington

D. P.

(2010). Key findings from longitudinal studies. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(10), 633–642.

25.

Petrosino

Turpin-Petrosino

Guckenburg

(2010). Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2010.1

26.

Quinn

W. H.

Van Dyke

D. J.

(2004). A multiple family group intervention for first-time juvenile offenders: Comparisons with probation and dropouts on recidivism. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10085

27.

Ryon

S. B.

Winokur Early

Kosloski

A. E.

(2017). Community-based and family-focused alternatives to incarceration: A quasi-experimental evaluation of interventions for delinquent youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.06.002

28.

Sampson

R. J.

Winship

Knight

(2013). Translating causal claims: Principles and strategies for policy-relevant criminology Sampson, Winship, and Knight criminology, causality, and public policy. Criminology and Public Policy, 12(4), 587–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12027

29.

Sexton

Turner

C. W.

(2010). The effectiveness of functional family therapy for youth with behavioral problems in a community practice setting. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019406

30.

Welsh

B. C.

Rocque

Greenwood

P. W.

(2014). Translating research into evidence-based practice in juvenile justice: Brand-name programs, meta-analysis, and key issues. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9182-3

31.

Wilson

S. J.

Lipsey

M. W.

Soydan

(2003). Are mainstream programs for juvenile delinquency less effective with minority youth than majority youth? A meta-analysis of outcomes research. Research on Social Work Practice, 13(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731502238754

Assessing the Efficacy of a Family-Based Juvenile Court Intervention

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References