The juvenile court was created as a means of diverting youth from the criminal justice system, and, in turn, diversion within the juvenile court has been used for a variety of purposes. This paper argues that an understanding of diversion, and its implications, requires distinguishing deservingness and consequentialism. Analysis of the former goal entails a focus on mitigation and draws attention to a critical gap in scholarship—namely, how do juvenile courts decide which youth deserve diversion? While risk and needs assessments likely play a role, so, too, may mitigation assessments about which youth are more deserving of interventions that may impose less punishment and more rehabilitation. In advancing this argument, we discuss ways in which a focus on diversion, and on mitigation, help to illuminate fundamental tensions in juvenile justice. We discuss, too, ways in which this focus can help to advance research and policy.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52.
2.
AshP. (2012). But he knew it was wrong: Evaluating adolescent culpability. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 40(1), 21–32.
3.
BasantaJ. L.FariñaF.ArceR. (2018). Risk-need-responsivity model: Contrasting criminogenic and noncriminogenic needs in high and low risk juvenile offenders. Children and Youth Services Review, 85, 137–142.
4.
BaylesM. (1982). Character, purpose, and criminal responsibility. Law & Philosophy, 1(1), 5–20.
5.
BazelonD. L. (1976). The morality of the criminal law: A rejoinder to Professor Morse. Southern California Law Review, 49, 1269–1274.
6.
BernardT. J.KurlychekM. C. (2010). The cycle of juvenile justice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
7.
BinderA.BinderV. (1983). Juvenile diversion. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(2), 69–77.
8.
BlombergT. G. (1983). Diversion’s disparate results and unresolved questions: An integrative evaluation perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 20(1), 25–38.
9.
BullingtonB.SprowlsJ.KatkinD.PhillipsM. (1978). A critique of diversionary juvenile justice. Crime & Delinquency, 24(1), 59–71.
10.
ButtsJ. A.MearsD. P. (2001). Reviving juvenile justice in a get-tough era. Youth and Society, 33(2), 169–198.
11.
CampbellC.OnifadeE.BarnesA.PetersonJ.AndersonV.DavidsonW.GordonD. (2014). Screening offenders: The exploration of a youth level of service/case management inventory (YLS/CMI) brief screener. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(1), 19–34.
12.
CavanaghC. (2022). Healthy adolescent development and the juvenile justice system: Challenges and solutions. Child Development Perspectives, 16(3), 141–147.
13.
CochranJ. C.MearsD. P. (2015). Race, ethnic, and gender divides in juvenile court sanctioning and rehabilitative intervention. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(2), 181–212.
14.
CottleC. C.LeeR. J.HeilbrunK. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(3), 367–394.
15.
DuffR. A. (1993). Choice, character, and criminal liability. Law & Philosophy, 12, 345–384.
16.
Ex Parte Crouse, 4 Wharton 9 (1839).
17.
FeldB. C. (2017). The evolution of the juvenile court: Race, politics, and the criminalizing of juvenile justice. New York University Press.
18.
GattiU.TremblayR. E.VitaroF. (2009). Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 991–998.
19.
GittnerL. S.DennisJ. A. (2021). A public health perspective on diversion programs for justice-involved individuals with mental health issues. In ScottC. S.CoppJ. E.DemuthS. (Eds.), Handbook on pretrial justice (pp. 171–193). Routledge.
20.
GlueckS.GlueckE. T. (1934). One thousand juvenile delinquents. Harvard University Press.
21.
Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010).
22.
HealyW.BronnerA. (1926). Delinquents and criminals: Their making and unmaking. MacMillan.
23.
HockenberryS.PuzzancheraC. (2021). Juvenile court statistics 2019. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
24.
HorderJ. (1993). Criminal culpability: The possibility of a general theory. Law and Philosophy, 12, 193–215.
25.
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
26.
KleinM. W. (1979). Deinstitutionalization and diversion of juvenile offenders: A litany of impediments. Crime and Justice, 1, 145–201.
27.
LemertE. M. (1981). Diversion in juvenile justice: What hath been wrought. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18, 34–46.
28.
MackJ. W. (1909). The juvenile court. Annual Report of the American Bar Association, 32, 449–476.
29.
MaroneyT. A. (2014). The once and future juvenile brain. In ZimringF. E.TanenhausD. S. (Eds.), Choosing the future for American juvenile justice (pp. 189–215). New York University Press.
30.
MearsD. P. (2012). The front end of the juvenile court: Intake and informal vs. formal processing. In FeldB. C.BishopD. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 573–605). Oxford University Press.
31.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.StultsB. J.GreenmanS. J.BhatiA. S.GreenwaldM. A. (2014). The “true” juvenile offender: Age effects and juvenile court sanctioning. Criminology, 52(2), 169–194.
32.
MearsD. P.KellyW. R. (1999). Assessments and intake processes in juvenile justice processing: Emerging policy considerations. Crime & Delinquency, 45(4), 50–529.
33.
MearsD. P.KuchJ. J.LindseyA. M.SiennickS. E.PestaG. B.GreenwaldM. A.BlombergT. G. (2016). Juvenile court and contemporary diversion: Helpful, harmful, or both?Criminology and Public Policy, 15(3), 953–981.
34.
MillerJ.PalmerK. (2020). Juvenile probation officer decisionmaking in a reforming state: Assessing the application of evidence-based principles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(9), 1136–1155.
35.
Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012).
36.
MooreM. S. (1990). Choice, character, and excuse. Social Philosophy and Policy, 7, 29–58.
37.
MoriartyJ. (2018). Desert-based justice. In OlsarettiS. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of distributive justice (pp. 152–173). Oxford University Press.
38.
MorseS. J. (1976). The twilight of welfare criminology: Reply to Judge Bazelon. Southern California Law Review, 49(6), 1247–1268.
39.
NeedlemanC. (1980). Discrepant assumptions in empirical research: The case of juvenile court screening. Social Problems, 28, 247–262.
40.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2022). Purpose clauses for juvenile justice systems, 2019.
41.
RobinsonP. H.HolcombL. (2022). Individualizing criminal law’s justice judgments: Shortcomings in the doctrines of culpability, mitigation, and excuse. Villanova Law Review, 67, 273–338.
42.
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2004).
43.
SchwalbeC. S.GearingR. E.MacKenzieM. J.BrewerK. B.IbrahimR. (2012). A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(1), 26–33.
44.
ScottE. S.SteinbergL. (2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Harvard University Press.
45.
SullivanC. J.ChildsK. K. (2022). Juvenile risk and needs assessment: Theory, research, policy, and practice. Routledge.
46.
SullivanC. J.VeyseyB. M.HamiltonZ. K.GrilloM. (2007). Reducing out-of-community placement and recidivism: Diversion of delinquent youth with mental health and substance use problems from the justice system. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 555–577.
47.
TanenhausD. S. (2004). Juvenile justice in the making. Oxford University Press.
48.
WilsonD. B.BrennanI.OlaghereA. (2018). Police-initiated diversion for youth to prevent future delinquent behavior: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14, 1–88.
49.
WilsonH. A.HogeR. D. (2013). The effect of youth diversion programs on recidivism: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(5), 497–518.
50.
WylieL. E.ClinkinbeardS. S.HobbsA. (2019). The application of risk-needs programming in a juvenile diversion program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(8), 1128–1147.
51.
YaffeG. (2018). The age of culpability: Children and the nature of criminal responsibility. Oxford University Press.
52.
ZaneS. N.CochranJ. C.MearsD. P. (2022). Deservingness and punishment in juvenile justice: Do Black youth grow up “faster” in the eyes of the court?Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 20(1), 41–62.
53.
ZaneS. N.PupoJ. A. (2023). What predicts out-of-home placement in juvenile court dispositions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(1), 229–244.
54.
ZaneS. N.WelshB. C.MearsD. P. (2016). Juvenile transfer and the specific deterrence hypothesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 901–925.
55.
ZimringF. E. (1981). Notes toward a jurisprudence of waiver. In HallJ. C.HamparianD. M.PettiboneJ.WhiteJ. L. (Eds.), Major issues in juvenile justice information and training: Readings in public policy (pp. 193–205). Academy for Contemporary Problems.
56.
ZimringF. E. (2000). The common thread: Diversion in juvenile justice. California Law Review, 88(6), 2477–2496.
