While prior studies of juvenile court outcomes have examined the impact of legal representation on out-of-home placement versus community sanctions, previous research has not fully explored the variation within sanctions that youth receive. The current study examines the influence of type of legal representation (public defender or private attorney) when predicting juvenile adjudications and dispositions. Using a sample of delinquent referrals from a Northeast state between 2009 and 2014, results showed that youth do receive different outcomes (e.g., probation, drug and alcohol treatment, accountability-oriented dispositions, etc.) based on the type of legal representation. The findings have important implications for juvenile court processing related to how courtroom actors impact case outcomes.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52.
2.
ArmstrongG. S.KimB. (2011). Juvenile penalties for “Lawyering Up” the role of counsel and extralegal case characteristics. Crime & Delinquency, 57(6), 827–848.
3.
BernardT. J.KurlychekM. C. (2010). The cycle of Juvenile justice. Oxford University Press.
4.
BirckheadT. R. (2012). Delinquent by reason of poverty. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 38, 53108.
5.
BirckheadT. R. (2017). The racialization of juvenile justice and the role of the defense attorney. Boston College Law Review, 58, 379–461.
6.
BishopD.FrazierC. (1992). Gender bias in Juvenile justice processing: Implications of the JJDP act. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(4), 1162–1186.
7.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2016). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Taylor & Francis.
8.
BotvinG. J.GriffinK. W.NicholsT. D. (2006). Preventing youth violence and delinquency through a universal school-based prevention approach. Prevention Science, 7(4), 403–408.
9.
BurrussG. W.JrKempf-LeonardK. (2002). The questionable advantage of defense counsel in juvenile court. Justice Quarterly, 19(1), 37–68.
10.
BurrussG. W.PeckJ. H.CameronA. L. (2020). Fifty years post Gault: A meta-analysis of the impact of attorney representation on delinquency outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 101634.
11.
BushwayS.JohnsonB. D.SlocumL. A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(2), 151–178.
12.
CarringtonP. J.MoyerS. (1990). The effect of defence counsel on plea and outcome in juvenile court. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 621–637.
13.
ChappellA. T. (2019). Predicting the behavior of law in the juvenile court: A focus on noncompliance cases. Crime & Delinquency, 65(8), 1027–1049.
14.
ClarkeS. H.KochG. G. (1980). Juvenile court: Therapy or crime control, and do lawyers make a difference?Law and Society Review, 14, 263–308.
15.
CochranJ. C.MearsD. P. (2015). Race, ethnic, and gender divides in juvenile court sanctioning and rehabilitative intervention. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(2), 181–212.
16.
DeJongC.JacksonK. C. (1998). Putting race into context: Race, juvenile justice processing, and urbanization. Justice Quarterly, 15(3), 487–504.
17.
DonnellyE. A. (2017). The disproportionate minority contact mandate: An examination of its impacts on juvenile justice processing outcomes (1997-2011). Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(4), 347–369.
18.
EmersonR. M. (1969). Judging delinquents: Context and process in the Juvenile courts. Aldine.
19.
FaroleD. J.JrLangtonL. (2010). A national assessment of public defender office caseloads. Judicature, 94(2), 87–90.
20.
FeeneyF.JacksonP. G. (1990). Public defenders, assigned counsel, retained counsel: Does the type of criminal defense counsel matter. Rutgers Law Journal, 22, 361–456.
21.
FeldB. C. (1988a). In re Gault revisited: A cross-state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court. Crime & Delinquency, 34(4), 393–424.
22.
FeldB. C. (1988b). The juvenile court meets the principle of offense: Punishment, treatment, and the difference it makes. Boston University Law Review, 68, 821–915.
23.
FeldB. C. (1989). The right to counsel in juvenile court: An empirical study of when lawyers appear and the difference they make. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 79(4), 1185–1346.
24.
FeldB. C. (1991). Justice by geography: Urban, suburban, and rural variations in juvenile justice administration. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(1), 156–210.
25.
FeldB. C. (2017). Competence and culpability: Delinquents in Juvenile courts, youths in criminal courts. Minnesota Law Review, 102, 473–576.
26.
FeldB. C. (2019). The evolution of the juvenile court: Race, politics, and the criminalizing of juvenile justice (Vol. 4). NYU Press.
27.
FeldB. C.SchaeferS. (2010). The right to counsel in juvenile court: The conundrum of attorneys as an aggravating factor at disposition. Justice Quarterly, 27(5), 713–741.
28.
FersterE.CourtlessT. (1972). Pre-dispositional data, role of counsel, and decisions in a juvenile court. Law and Society Review, 7, 195–222.
29.
FersterE.CourtlessT.SnethenE. (1971). The juvenile justice system: In search of the role of counsel. Fordham Law Review, 39, 375–412.
30.
FountainE. N.WoolardJ. L. (2018). How defense attorneys consult with juvenile clients about plea bargains. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(2), 192–203.
31.
FreiburgerT. L.JordanK. L. (2011). A multilevel analysis of race on the decision to petition a case in the juvenile court. Race and Justice, 1(2), 185–201.
32.
GoldsteinA. P.GlickB.ReinerS.ZimmermanD.CoultryT. M.GoldD. (1986). Aggression replacement training: A comprehensive intervention for the acting-out delinquent. Journal of Correctional Education, 37(3), 120–126.
33.
GrissoT.SteinbergL.WoolardJ.CauffmanE.ScottE.GrahamS.SchwartzR. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27(4), 333–363.
34.
GuevaraL.HerzD.SpohnC. (2008). Race, gender, and legal counsel: Differential outcomes in two juvenile courts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6(1), 83–104.
35.
GuevaraL.ShekarkharZ.FullerK. (2018). When does race matter in juvenile court outcomes? A test of the “type of offense” hypothesis. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 69, 5–24.
36.
GuevaraL.SpohnC.HerzD. (2004). Race, legal representation, and juvenile justice: Issues and concerns. Crime & Delinquency, 50(3), 344–371.
37.
HeckmanJ. J. (1974). Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrics, 42(4), 679–694.
38.
HeckmanJ. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 475–492.
39.
HenggelerS. W.MeltonG. B.SmithL. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious Juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 953–961.
40.
HockenberryS.PuzzancheraC. (2020). Juvenile court statistics 2018. National Center for Juvenile Justice.
41.
HurstH. (1999). Workload measurement for juvenile justice system personnel: Practices and needs. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grants Program. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
42.
Kempf-Leonard, K. (2010). Does having an attorney provide a better outcome?Criminology & Public Policy, 9(2), 357–363.
43.
LeiberM. J. (2016). Race, prior offending, and juvenile court outcomes. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(1), 88–106.
44.
LeiberM. J.MackK. Y. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 34–70.
45.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H.Beaudry-CyrM. (2016). When does race and gender matter? The interrelationships between the gender of probation officers and juvenile court detention and intake outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 614–641.
46.
LoweryP. G. (2019). Plea bargains among serious and violent girls: An intersectional approach exploring race in the juvenile court. Feminist criminology, 14(1), 115–139.
47.
MartinG. A.Jr. (1992). The delinquent and the juvenile court: Is there still a place for rehabilitation. Connecticut Law Review, 25, 57–93.
48.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.GreenmanS. J.BhatiA. S.GreenwaldM. A. (2011). Evidence on the effectiveness of juvenile court sanctions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(6), 509–520.
49.
MearsD. P.KuchJ. J.LindseyA. M.SiennickS. E.PestaG. B.GreenwaldM. A.BlombergT. G. (2016). Juvenile court and contemporary diversion: Helpful, harmful, or both?Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 953–981.
50.
Miller-WilsonL. S. (2003). Pennsylvania: An assessment of access to counsel and quality of representation in delinquency proceedings. American Bar Association Juvenile Justice Center.
51.
NaginD. (1998). Deterrence and incapacitation. In TonryM. (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 345–368). Oxford University Press.
52.
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. (1973). Report on the courts. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
53.
National Juvenile Defender Center. (2017). Access denied: A national snapshot of states’ failure to protect children’s right to counsel. https://njdc.info/snapshot/
54.
PeckJ. H.Beaudry-CyrM. (2016). Does who appears before the juvenile court matter on adjudication and disposition outcomes? The interaction between client race and lawyer type. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(1), 131–152.
55.
PeckJ. H.JenningsW. G. (2016). A critical examination of “being Black” in the Juvenile justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 219–232.
56.
RedlichA. D.ShteynbergR. V. (2016). To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 611–625.
57.
RodriguezN. (2007). Juvenile court context and detention decisions: Reconsidering the role of race, ethnicity, and community characteristics in juvenile court processes. Justice Quarterly, 24(4), 629–656.
58.
RodriguezN. (2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 391–413.
59.
ScaliM. A. (2019). Meeting the mandates of gault: Automatic appointment of counsel in juvenile delinquency proceedings. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 70(3), 7–23.
60.
SnyderH. N.SickmundM. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
61.
SteinbergL. (2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 459–485.
62.
StolzenbergR. M.RellesD. A. (1990). Theory testing in a world of constrained research design: The significance of Heckman’s censored sampling bias correction for nonexperimental research. Sociological Methods & Research, 18, 395–415.
63.
SwigertV. L.FarrellR. A. (1977). Normal homicides and the law. American Sociological Review, 42, 16–32.
64.
TittleC. R.CurranD. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23–58.
65.
VincentG. M.GuyL. S.GrissoT. (2012). Risk assessment in Juvenile justice: A guidebook for implementation. Models for Change: Systems Reform in Juvenile Justice, MacArthur Foundation.
66.
WilbanksW. (1987). The Myth of a racist criminal justice system. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
