Criminological investigations into the trade in antiquities have mainly focused on the sale of stolen artifacts or looted archaeological material; however, the question of authenticity has received little attention. This article examines the market for antiquities on eBay to investigate the claims made by sellers about the authenticity of artifacts and discusses the complexities of unraveling the fake from the genuine.
BowmanB. A. (2008). Transnational crimes against culture: Looting at archaeological sites and the “grey” market in antiquities. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 225-242. doi:210.1177/1043986208318210210.1177/1043986208318210
4.
BrodieN. (2006). The effect of an artefact’s provenance on its saleability. Culture Without Context,19, 4-6.
5.
BrodieN.RenfrewC.DooleJ. (2001). Trade in illicit antiquities: The destruction of the world’s archaeological heritage. Cambridge, MA: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
6.
CarmanJ. (1996). Valuing ancient things: Archaeology and law. London, UK: Leicester University Press.
CogginsC. (1972). Archaeology and the art market. Science, 175, 263-266.
11.
DewanS.HsuV. (2001). Trust in electronic markets: Price discovery in generalist versus specialty online auctions (Working paper). Seattle: University of Washington.
GeismarH. (2001). What’s in a price? An ethnography of tribal art at auction. Journal of Material Culture, 6(1), 25-47. doi:10.1177/13591835010060010210.1177/135918350100600102
14.
GillD.ChippindaleC. (1993). Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for Cycladic figures. American Journal of Archaeology, 97, 601-659.
15.
GillD.ChippindaleC. (2002). The trade in looted antiquities and the return of cultural property: A British parliamentary inquiry. International Journal of Cultural Property, 11(01), 50-64.
JarrettK. (2006). The perfect community: Disciplining the eBay user. In HillisK.PetitM.EpleyN. S. (Eds.), Everyday eBay: Culture, collecting and desire. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
18.
LidingtonH. (2002). The role of the Internet in removing the shackles of the salesroom: Anytime, anyplace, anything, anywhere. Public Archaeology, 2, 67-84.
19.
MackenzieS. R. M. (2005a). Dig a bit deeper: Law, regulation and the illicit antiquities market. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 249-268. doi:210.1093/bjc/azh1099210.1093/bjc/azh1099
20.
MacKenzieS. R. M. (2005b). Going, going, gone: Regulating the Market in Illicit Antiquities. Leicester, UK: Institute of Art and Law.
21.
MarthariM. (2001). Altering information from the past: Illegal excavations in Greece and the case of the Early Bronze Age Cyclades. In BrodieN.RenfrewC.DooleJ. (Ed.), Trade in illicit antiquities: The destruction of the world’s archaeological heritage (pp. 161-172). Cambridge, MA: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
22.
MassyL. (2008). The antiquity market: Between legality and illegality. International Journal of Social Economics, 35, 729-738. doi:710.1108/03068290810898936710.1108/03068290810898936
Papa SokalM. (2006, March 22-25). Antiquities collecting and the looting of archaeological sites. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Ename International Colloquium, “Who Owns the Past? Heritage Rights and Responsibilities in a Multicultural World,” held atGhent, Belgium. Retrieved from http://www.savingantiquities.org/pdf/PapaSokal_Antiquities.pdf
29.
RenfrewC. (1993). Collectors are the real looters. Archaeology, 46(3), 16-17.
30.
RenfrewC. (2000). Loot, legitimacy and ownership: The ethical crisis in archaeology. London, UK: Duckworth.
31.
SmithC. W. (1989). Auctions: The social construction of value. London, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
