For several decades, researchers have studied sentencing outcomes in the United States and, to a much lesser extent, other Western countries. Although much research on punishment decisions focuses on Black, White and, to a lesser extent, Hispanic disparities, South Korea presents an opportunity to examine the role of extra-legal factors in criminal punishment in an ethnically homogeneous society. The authors investigate sentencing outcomes for drug offenses in South Korea, using data from the six largest cities in South Korea from 1997 to 2001. The authors find that legal factors connected to the offense and past criminal behavior of the offender primarily determined the length of sentences for Korean drug offenders. The authors also find that admitting guilt resulted in shorter sentences but that those represented by publically provided attorneys received modestly longer sentences. The authors also find males and older offenders receiving longer sentences.
Albonetti, C. ( 1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion . Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2.
Bonilla-Silva, E. ( 1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation . American Sociological Review, 62, 465-480.
3.
Box, S., & Hale, C. ( 1985). Unemployment, imprisonment and prison overcrowding. Contemporary Crises, 9, 209-228.
4.
Chiricos, T., & Bales, B. ( 1991). Unemployment and punishment: an empirical assessment . Criminology, 29, 701-724.
5.
Dixon, J. ( 1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1157-1198.
6.
Engen, R., & Steen, S. ( 2000). The power to punish: Discretion and sentencing reform in the war on drugs. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1357-1395.
7.
Griffin, T., & Wooldredge, J. (2006). Sex-based disparities in felony dispositions before and after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology, 44, 893-924.
8.
Han, J., & Ling, L.H.M. ( 1998). Authoritarianism in the hypermasculinized state: Hybridity, patriarchy, and capitalism in Korea. International Studies Quarterly, 42, 53-78.
9.
Hartley, R.D., Kwak, D.-H., & Park, M. ( 2011). Exploring sex disparity in sentencing outcomes: A focus on narcotics offenders in South Korea. Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 268-286.
10.
Hebert, C. ( 1997). Sentencing outcomes of black, Hispanic, and white males convicted under federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Review, 22, 133-156.
11.
Johnson, D.T. ( 2001). The Japanese way of justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
Koons-Witt, B. ( 2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology , 40, 297-328.
LaFrentz, C., & Spohn, C. ( 2006). Who is punished more harshly in federal court? The interaction of race/ethnicity, gender, age, and employment status in the sentencing of drug offenders. Justice Research and Policy, 8, 25-56.
15.
Miethe, T., & Moore. ( 1985). Socioeconomic disparity under determinate sentencing systems: A comparison of pre-guidelines and post-guidelines practices in Minnesota . Criminology, 23, 337-277.
16.
Mustard, D. ( 2001). Racial, ethnic and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 1-30.
17.
Nobiling, T., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (1998). A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentencing severity. Justice Quarterly, 15, 459-485.
18.
Savelsberg, J. ( 1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as a neoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1346-1381.
19.
Shin, E., Kang, E., & Lee, M. ( 2002). The realities of legal disposal against drug criminals . Seoul, Korea: Korean Institute of Criminology.
20.
Spohn, C. ( 2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal, 3, 427-501.
21.
Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. ( 2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multi-site study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
22.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. ( 2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployment black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
23.
Stacey, A., & Spohn, C. ( 2006). Gender and the social costs of sentencing: An analysis of sentencing imposed on male and female offenders in three U.S. district courts. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 11, 281-306.
24.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2001). Does gender modify the effect of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female white, black, and Hispanic defendants . Journal Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.
25.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. ( 1993) Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology , 31, 411-446.
26.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Ulmer, J.T. ( 1995). Age differences in sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 12, 583-602.
27.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J.T., & Kramer, J. ( 1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
28.
Tonry, M., & Frase, R. (Eds.). (2001). Sentencing and sanctioning in western countries. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
Ulmer, J.T., & Bradley, M. ( 2006). Variation in trial penalties among serious violent offenses . Criminology, 44, 631-670.
30.
Zatz, M. ( 2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decisionmaking: Looking toward the 21st century. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal, 3, 503-552.
