Much talk has surrounded the use of risk assessment in community corrections. Community corrections agencies continue to struggle with what risk instrument to adopt and how to implement it in a comprehensive way. One of the most important factors that impedes the successful implementation of risk assessment instruments is organizational politics. This essay evaluates some of the organizational politics that inhibit the successful implementation of risk assessment instruments and highlights several factors that can mitigate this effect.
Andrews, D.A. ( 1995). The psychology of criminal conduct and effective treatment . In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing re-offending: Guidelines from research and practice (pp. 35-62). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised: Color Plot Profile Form for male inmates. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 1998). Psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
4.
Austin, J. ( 2006). How much risk can we take? The misuse of risk assessment in corrections. Federal Probation, 70, 58-63.
5.
Bogue, B. ( 2004). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections: The principles of effective intervention. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections .
6.
Bonta, J. ( 2002). Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 355-379.
7.
Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T.L., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. ( 2008). Exploring the black-box of community supervision . Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 248-270.
8.
Byrne, J.M., & Pattavina, A. ( 2006). Assessing the role of clinical and actuarial risk assessment in an evidence-based community corrections system: Issues to consider . Federal Probation, 70, 64-67.
9.
Cohn, A.W. ( 2002). Managing the correctional enterprise-The quest for "what works." Federal Probation, 66, 4-10.
10.
Corbett, R.P. ( 2008). A promising future for community corrections. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 303-310.
11.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. ( 2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal Justice 2000: Vol 4. Policies processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice .
12.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. ( 2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81, 313-338.
13.
Ferguson, J.L. ( 2002). Putting the "what works" research into practice: An organizational perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 29, 472-492.
14.
Fuller, J. ( 2004). From counting heads to measuring work: A risk control model. In Topics in Corrections: Assessment Issues for Managers (NIC Publication No. J1C0c-038, pp. 31-34). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
15.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., Cullen, F., & Paparozzi, M. ( 2002). The commonsense revolution and correctional policy . In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation and treatment (pp. 359-386). Chichester , UK: John Wiley.
16.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. ( 1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works? Criminology, 34, 575-607.
17.
Glaze, L.E., & Bonczar, T.P. ( 2008). Probation and parole in the United States, 2006 (NCJ 220218). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
Gottfredson, S.D., & Moriarty, L.J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime & Delinquency , 52, 178-200.
19.
Grove, W.M., & Meehl, P.E. ( 1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
20.
Hare, R.D. ( 1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) . Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
21.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Quinsey, V.L. ( 1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
22.
Harris, P.M. ( 2006). What community supervision officers need to know about actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment. Federal Probation , 70, 8-14.
23.
Holland, T.R., Holt, N., Levi, M., & Beckett, G.E. ( 1983). Comparison and combination of clinical and statistical predictions of recidivism among adult offenders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 203-211.
24.
Hughes, K.A. ( 2006). Justice expenditures and employment, 2003 (NCJ 212260) . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
Latessa, E.T., Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. ( 2002). Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation , 66, 43-50.
26.
Loza, W., & Green, K. ( 2003). The Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A self-report measure for predicting recidivism versus clinician-administered measures: A five-year follow-up study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 18, 781-797.
27.
Martinson, R. ( 1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform . Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
28.
Maurutto, P., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2006). Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control. British Journal of Criminology , 46, 438-454.
29.
Paparozzi, M. ( 1999). Reinventing probation from the top down: A look at leadership . Corrections Today, 61, 118-121.
30.
Paparozzi, M. ( 2003, August). Probation, parole and public safety: The need for principled practices versus faddism and circular policy development . Corrections Today, 65, 46-50.
31.
Schlager, M.D. ( 2008). An assessment of parole officer and administrator attitudes on organizational culture and parole supervision in a northeastern state. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 271-289.
32.
Schneider, A.L., Ervin, L., & Snyder-Joy, Z. (1996). Further exploration of the flight from discretion: The role of risk/need instruments in probation supervision decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 109-121.
33.
Taxman, F. ( 2006). Assessment with a flair: Offender accountability in supervision plans. Federal Probation, 70, 2-7.
34.
Taxman, F.S. ( 2008). No illusions: Offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision efforts. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 275-302.
35.
Van Voorhis, P. ( 1987). Correctional effectiveness: The high cost of ignoring success. Federal Probation, 51, 59-62.
36.
White, T.F. ( 2004). Implementing an offender risk needs assessment: An organizational change process. In Topics in Corrections: Assessment Issues for Managers (NIC Publication No. J1C0c-038, pp. 42-48). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
