Advancing the Usefulness of Research for Victims of Crime

Abstract

Most researchers who study victimization are interested in finding ways to make their work more useful. The articles in this issue discuss how the practice of research can be better linked to policy making, how hard-to-reach victims might be better served, how risk is correlated across various domains and tied to broader structural conditions, and how legal remedies might better serve victims of crime. In this article, the authors examine some of the practical matters that have made it difficult to build a solid empirical foundation on which to base effective policies. These practical challenges include the very large and diverse literatures and disciplinary perspectives and the unique set of methodological difficulties associated with research on victims of crime. Several ways in which these challenges might be overcome are discussed, including multidisciplinary literature reviews, coordinated assessments of methodological approaches and findings, and greater dialogue among those with specialized understandings of different forms of victimization.

Keywords

victimization policy interdisciplinary approach empirical challenge

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett, L. , Riger, S. , Schewe, P. , Howard, A. , & Wasco, S. (2004). Effectiveness of hotline, advocacy, counseling, and shelter services for victims of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 815-829.

Chalk, R., & King, P. (Eds.). (1998). Violence in families: Assessing prevention and treatment programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Crowell, N., & Burgess, A. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Dugan, L. (1999). The effect of criminal victimization on a household's moving decision. Criminology, 37, 903-930.

Kruttschnitt, C., McLaughlin, B., & Petrie, C. (Eds.). (2004). Advancing the federal research agenda on violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Norris, F. , Friedman, M. , Watson, P. , Byrne, C. , Diaz, E. , & Kaniasty, K. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part 1. An empirical review of the empirical literature 1981-2001. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 65, 207-239.

Norris, F. , & Kaniasty, K. (1994). Psychological distress following criminal victimization in the general population: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and prospective analyses. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 62, 111-123.

Petersilia, J., Foote, J., & Crowell, N. (Eds.). (2001). Crime victims with developmental disabilities: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Riger, S. , Bennett, L. , Wasco, S. , Schewe, P. , Frohman, L. , & Camacho, J. (2002). Evaluation of services for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

10.

Sherman, L. , Gottfredson, D. , MacKenzie, D. , Eck, J. , Reuter, P. , & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising: A report to the United States Congress. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

11.

Ybarra, L. , & Lohr, S. (2002). Estimates of repeat victimization using the National Crime Victimization Survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 18, 1-21.