Comadronas attend most births in rural and urban Guatemala where the maternal mortality rate (MMR) is highest in Latin America. Information has been published regarding rural comadronas’ response to obstetrical emergencies. Understanding urban comadronas’ response to obstetrical emergencies is essential to addressing Guatemala’s MMR.
Methods:
A total of 17 urban comadronas participated in one, 34-min focus group to share their knowledge, practices, and attitudes regarding obstetrical emergencies. We used the long table to analyze the content to develop a matrix of themes.
Results:
Five themes emerged. Urban comadronas receive consistent training, have hospital transportation, and feel confident in their knowledge, but they lack equipment and feel hospital providers disrespect them. Still, the joy of attending births outweighs the challenges they face.
Discussion:
Urban comadronas described a different experience of responding to obstetrical emergencies than rural comadronas. Distinct approaches are needed to provide culturally congruent support for urban and rural comadronas when responding to obstetrical emergencies.
CharyA.Kraemer DiazA.HendersonB.RohloffP. (2013). The changing role of indigenous lay midwives in Guatemala: New frameworks for analysis. Midwifery, 29(8), 852–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.08.011
3.
GarciaK. (2022). An observational study of teaching methods with low-literacy comadronas in urban Guatemala. Canadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice, 21(3), 53–63.
4.
GarciaK.ArmstrongC.IacobE.FlynnE.RodriguezA.SimmonsM.GonzalezZ. (2024). Pretest posttest evaluation with lay midwives in remote Guatemala after educational activities about COVID-19. Remote and Rural Health. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8387
5.
GarciaK.DowlingD.MettlerG. (2018). Teaching Guatemalan traditional birth attendants about obstetrical emergencies. Midwifery, 6(61), 36–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.012
GarciaK.KilanowskiJ. (2019). Senales de Peligro: Guatemalan lay midwives’ perceptions of responding to obstetrical emergencies. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 31(6), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/10436596198891114
8.
GarciaK.MorrisonB.KilanowskiJ. (2012). Focus group with Guatemalan traditional midwives about postpartum hemorrhage. Online Journal of Cultural Competence in Nursing and Health Care, 2(2), 1–10.
9.
GarciaK.MorrisonB.SavrinC. (2012). Teaching Guatemalan midwives about postpartum hemorrhage. Journal of Maternal and Child Nursing, 37(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182387c0a
JuarezM.JuarezY.CoyoteE.NguyenT.ShawC.Hall-CliffordR.GillardG.RohloffP. (2010). Working with Guatemalan lay midwives to improve the detection of neonatal complications in rural Guatemala. British Medical Journal Open Quality, 9(1), e000775. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000775
13.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
14.
LangJ. B.ElkinE. D. (1997). A study of the beliefs and birthing practices of traditional midwives in rural Guatemala. Journal of Nurse Midwifery, 42(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-2182(96)00069-9
15.
MartinezB.Hall-CliffordR.CoyoteE.StrouxL.ValderramaC. E.AaronC.FrancisA.HendrenC.RohloffR.CliffordG. D. (2017). Agile development of a smartphone app for perinatal monitoring in a resource-constrained setting. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries, 11(1), 1–20. http://www.jhidc.org/index.php/jhidc/article/view/158/212
16.
MaupinJ. N. (2008). Remaking the Guatemala midwife: Health care reform and midwifery training programs in Highland Guatemala. Medical Anthropology, 27(4), 353–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740802427679
17.
McFarlandM. R.MixerS. J.Webbe-AlamahH.BurkR. (2012). Ethnonursing: A qualitative research method for studying culturally competent care. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(3), 259–273.
RadoffK. A.ThompsonL. M.BlyK. C.RomeroC. (2013). Practices related to postpartum uterine involution in the Western Highlands of Guatemala. National Institute of Public Health Access, 29(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.12.009
21.
RoostM.JohnsdotterS.LiljestrandJ.EssenB. (2004). A qualitative study of conceptions and attitudes regarding maternal mortality among traditional birth attendants in rural Guatemala. British Journal of Obstetrical Gynaecology, 111(12), 1372–1377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00270.x
22.
StollackI.ValdezM.RivasK.PerryH. (2016). Casas maternas in the rural highlands of Guatemala: A mixed-methods case study of the introduction and utilization of birthing facilities by an indigenous population. Global Health: Science and Practice, 4(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00266
23.
SummerA.GuendelmanS.KestlerE.WalkerD. (2018). Professional midwifery in Guatemalan: A qualitative exploration of perceptions, attitudes and expectations among stakeholders. Social Science & Medicine, 184, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.005
24.
SummerA.WalkerD.GuendelmanS. (2019). A review of the forces influencing maternal health policies in post-war Guatemala. World Medical and Health Policy, 11(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.292
25.
ThompsonL. M.LeviA. J.BlyK. C.HaC.KeirnsT. (2014). Premature or just small? Training Guatemalan birth attendants to weigh and assess gestational age of newborns: An analysis of outcomes. Health Care for Women International, 35(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10/1080/07399332.2013.829066
26.
WalshL. (2006). Beliefs and rituals in traditional birth attendant practice in Guatemala. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 17(2), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659605285412
