Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a practice, in breach of human rights, which currently extends to European countries. Given that migration to a Western country can involve cultural change, the aim of the present study is to explore the experiences and perceptions of sub-Saharan women regarding FGM/C following migration to Spain.
Method
A qualitative exploratory research design utilizing life history methodology was applied. Participants (n = 24) were recruited until data saturation was reached.
Results
Sub-Saharan women describe their experience of FGM/C. Once in Spain, they begin to demystify the justifications for which FGM/C is practiced and to break the taboo that surrounds the practice.
Discussion
Migration leads individuals to reflect on the traditional practices from their countries of origin. The nursing profession must accompany migrant women throughout their process of change and provide objective information from a position of cultural understanding, avoiding attitudes that might create a sense of revictimization while their resultant health consequences are being attended to.
BaillotH.MurrayN.ConnellyE.HowardN. (2018). Addressing female genital mutilation in Europe: A scoping review of approaches to participation, prevention, protection, and provision of services. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0713-9
2.
BardinL. (2016). Análise de Conteúdo: Edição revisada e actualizada [Content analysis: Revised and updated edition] (Vol. 70). Edições.
3.
BergR. C.TaraldsenS.SaidM. A.SørbyeI. K. (2017). Reasons for and experiences with surgical interventions for female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): A systematic review. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14(8), 977-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.016
4.
BergR. C.UnderlandV.Odgaard-JensenJ.FretheimA.VistG. E. (2014). Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 4(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316
5.
CreswellJ. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
6.
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2019). Estimation of girls at risk of female genital mutilation in the European Union: Step-by-step guide (2nd ed.).
7.
EvansC.TweheyoR.McGarryJ.EldridgeJ.AlbertJ.NkoyoV.HigginbottomG. (2019). Crossing cultural divides: A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing the provision of healthcare related to female genital mutilation from the perspective of health professionals. PLOS ONE, 14(3), Article 0211829. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211829
8.
García de Herreros MadueñoT.Garabato GonzálezS.Martínez BlancoM. L. (2017). Guía breve de actuaciones sanitarias en la comunidad de Madrid [Brief guide to health activities in the Madrid community]. Red de Prevención de la Mutilación Genital Femenina en la Comunidad de Madrid.
HassanenS.Okubatsion WolduD.MkuuR. (2019). The effects of migration on the practice and perception female genital cutting (FGC) among the Horn of Africa’s immigrants in Melbourne Australia. AIMS Public Health, 6(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2019.1.67
11.
JohnsdotterS. (2018). The impact of migration on attitudes to female genital cutting and experiences of sexual dysfunction among migrant women with FGC. Current Sexual Health Reports, 10(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0139-4
12.
JohnsdotterS.EssénB. (2016). Cultural change after migration: Circumcision of girls in Western migrant communities. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 32(April), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BPOBGYN.2015.10.012
13.
Kabengele MpingaE.MaciasA.Hasselgard-RoweJ.Ngianga-BakwinK.Tshimungu KandoloF.VerlooH.Zacharie BukondaN.ChastonityP. (2016). Female genital mutilation: A systematic review of research on its economic and social impacts across four decades. Global Health Action, 9(1), Article 31489. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.31489
14.
Kaplan MarcusánA.López GayA. (2016). Mapa de la Mutilación Genital Femenina en España 2016 [Map of female genital mutilation (FGM) in Spain 2016]. Wassu-Universität Autónoma De Barcelona/UAB Fundación. https://mgf.uab.cat/esp/publicaciones_cient%C3%ADficas.html
15.
KoukouiS. (2019). Sex, grief, and psychic trauma: Considering history and politics in the psychosexual treatment of women with FGC fantasy : Body and desire. Current Sexual Health Reports, 11(2), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00199-7
16.
KoukouiS.HassanG.GuzderJ. (2017). The mothering experience of women with FGM/C raising “uncut” daughters, in Ivory Coast and in Canada. Reproductive Health, 14(1), Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0309-2
17.
LeverH.OttenheimerD.TeysirJ.SingerE.AtkinsonH. G. (2018). Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and a history of pervasive gender-based violence among women asylum seekers who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: A retrospective case review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 21(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0782-x
18.
MoorleyC. R.CahillS.CorcoranN. (2016). Stroke among African-Caribbean women: Lay beliefs of risks and causes. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(3-4), 403-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13061
19.
MoriñaA. (2016). Investigar con historias de vida: Metodología biográfico-narrativa [Investigate with life stories: Biographical-narrative methodology]. Narcea.
Pastor BravoM.Almansa MartínezP.Ballesteros MeseguerC.Pastor RodriguezJ. (2012). Contextualizacion de la mutilación genital femenina desde enfermería: Análisis videográfico [Contextualization of female genital mutilation from nursing: Video analysis]. Enfermería Global, 25, 426-439. https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.11.1.143201
22.
Pastor BravoM.Almansa-MartínezP.Jiménez-RuizI. (2018). Living with mutilation : A qualitative study on the consequences of female genital mutilation in women‘s health and the healthcare system in Spain. Midwifery, 66(November), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.08.004
23.
PluggeE.AdamS.HindiL.El GitauJ.ShodunkeN. (2018). The prevention of female genital mutilation in England: What can be done?Journal of Public Health, 41(3), 261-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy128
24.
Quinn-NilasC.BensonL.MilhausenR.BuchholzA.GoncalvesM. (2016). The relationship between body image and domains ofsexual functioning among heterosexual, emerging adult women. Sexual Medicine, 4(3), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2016.02.004
25.
Reig-AlcarazM.Siles-GonzálezJ.Solano-RuizC. (2016). A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to female genital mutilation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12823
26.
RouziA. A.BergR. C.SahlyN.AlkafyS.AlzabanF.AbduljabbarH.ArabiaS. (2017). Effects of female genital mutilation/cutting on the sexual function of Sudanese women: A cross-sectional study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 217(1), P62.E1-P62.E6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.044
27.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Van BaelenL.OrtensiL.LeyeE. (2016). Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 21(6), 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1234597
31.
VillaniM. (2017). Reparative approaches in medicine and the different meanings of “reparation” for women with FGM/C in a migratory context. Diversity & Equality in Health and Care, 14(5), 264-267. https://doi.org/10.21767/2049-5471.1000120
