The aim of this study was to adapt the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) to family caregivers of inpatients in medical and surgical clinics to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version. The study design was descriptive and methodological. A total of 223 family caregivers providing care to patients for at least 1 week in clinics were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Turkish translation of the ZBI. The psychometric testing of the adapted instrument was carried out to establish internal consistency, interitem correlation, and construct validity. The content validity procedure resulted in a final scale comprising 18 items. Cronbach’s alpha was .82. Factor analysis yielded one factor. The Turkish version of the ZBI adapted to the clinics can be used as a one-factor tool.
AkgülA. (2005). Tıbbi araştırmalarda istatistiksel analiz teknikleri SPSS uygulamaları [The statistical analysis techniques, SPSS applications in medical studies]. Ankara, Turkey: Emek Ofset.
2.
AkkuşY. (2011). Multiple sclerosis patient caregivers: The relationship between their psychological and social needs and burden levels. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 326-333.
3.
AraiY.TamiyaN.YanoE. (2003). The short version of the Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (J-ZBI_8): Its reliability and validity. Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi, 40, 497-503.
4.
Bayık TemelA. (2008). Kültürlerarası (çok kültürlü) hemşirelik eğitimi [Transcultural nursing education]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi [Journal of Atatürk University Nursing School], 11(2), 92-101.
5.
BédardM.MolloyD. W.SquireL.DuboisS.LeverJ. A.O’DonnellM. (2001). The Zarit Burden Interview: A new short version and screening version. The Gerontologist, 41, 652-657.
6.
BurnsN.GroveS. K. (2001). The practice of nursing research, conduct, critique & utilization (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
7.
BüyüköztürkŞ. (2009). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabi [Data analysis booklet for social sciences] (10th ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Yayıncılık.
8.
ChanT. S. F.LamL. C. W.ChiuH. F. K. (2005). Validation of the Chinese version of the Zarit Burden Interview. Hong Kong Journal of Psychiatry, 15(1), 9-13.
9.
CingilD.GözümS. (2008).Yaşlı bireyler için “Aile üyeleri tarafından verilen bakımı değerlendirme envanteri” nin geçerlilik ve güvenirliği [Reliability and validity of family caregiving factors inventory for dependent older adults in Turkey]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi [Dokuz Eylul University School of Nursing Electronic Journal], 1(1), 5-18.
10.
Erefeİ. (2002). Veri toplama araçlarının niteliği [The quality of data collecting instruments], 169-187. In İ. Erefe (Ed.), Hemşirelikte araştirma ilke süreç ve yöntemleri [Research, principle, process, and methods in nursing]. Istanbul, Turkey: Odak Ofset.
11.
ErkuşA. (2003). Psikometri üzerine yazilar [Writings on psychometry]. Ankara, Turkey: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları (Turkish Psychological Association Press).
12.
FaisonK. J.FariaS. H.FrankD. (1999). Caregivers of chronically ill elderly: Perceived burden. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 16, 243-253.
13.
GoldsteinN. E.ConcatoJ.FriedT. R.KaslS. V.Johnson-HurzelerR.BradleyE. H. (2004). Factors associated with caregiver burden among caregivers of terminally ill patients with cancer. Journal of Palliative Care, 20, 38-43.
14.
GözümS.AksayanS. (2003). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber II: Psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma [A guide for transcultural scale adaptation, II: Psychometric characteristics and cross-cultural comparisons]. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi [Turkish Journal of Nursing Research], 5(1), 3-14.
15.
İnciF. H.ErdemM. (2008). Bakım verme yükü ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği [Validity and reliability of the Burden Interview and its adaptation to Turkish]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi [Journal of Atatürk University Nursing School], 11(4), 85-95.
16.
KennesonA.BoboJ. K. (2010). The effect of caregiving on women in families with Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Health & Social Care in the Community, 18, 520-528.
17.
KnightB. G.FoxL. S.ChouC. P. (2000). Factor structure of the Burden Interview. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 6, 249-258.
18.
KüçükgüçlüÖ.EsenA.YenerG. (2009). Bakım verenlerin yükü envanterinin Türk toplumu için geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesi [The reliability and validity of the caregiver burden inventory in Turkey]. Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish), 26(1), 60-73.
19.
KuğuoğluS. (2010). Transkültürel hemşirelik [Transcultural nursing]. In KaradakovanA.Eti AslanF. (Eds.), Dahili ve cerrahi hastaliklarda bakim [Care medical and surgical diseases], 85-98. Adana, Turkey: Nobel Kitabevi.
20.
Lai DanielW. L. (2007). Validation of the Zarit Burden Interview for Chinese Canadian caregivers. Social Work Research, 31(1), 45-53.
21.
LuL.YangX.FengQ. (2009). Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview: Development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 63, 730-734.
22.
MorimotoT.SchrenerS. A.AsanoH. (2003). Caregiver burden and health-related quality of life among Japanese stroke caregivers. Age and Ageing, 32, 218-223.
23.
ÖnerN. (1987). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlamasında bir yöntem bilim modeli [A scientific model in the intercultural scale adaptation]. Psikoloji Dergisi [Journal of Psychology], 6(21), 80-83.
24.
OyebodeJ. (2003). Assessment of carers’ psychological needs. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9(1), 45-53.
25.
ÖzdamarK. (2004). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi [Statistical data analysis by means of packet programmes] (5th ed). Eskişehir, Turkey: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları (Anadolu University Press).
26.
ÖzerN.HacıalioğluN.Çevik AkyılR.AkpınarR. (2006). Hastaların kendilerini bakım veren yakınlarına yük olarak hissetme durumları [The situations of the patients to feel a burden themselves for their relatives who gave the care them]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi [Journal of Atatürk University Nursing School], 9(4), 31-37.
27.
ParksS. M.NovielliK. D. A. (2000). Practical guide to caring for caregivers. American Family Physician, 62, 2613-2621.
28.
PinquartM.SorensenS. (2003). Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 250-267.
29.
PolitD. F.BeckC. (2005). In essentials of nursing research methods, appraisal, and utilization (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
30.
ScazufcaM. (2002). Brazilian version of the Burden Interview Scale for the assessment of burden of care in carers of people with mental illnesses. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 24(1), 12-17.
31.
SiegertJ. A.JacksonD. M.TennantA.Turner-StokesL. (2010). Factor analysis and Rasch analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview for acquired brain injury carer research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42, 302-309.
32.
TaubA.AndreoliS. B.BertolucciP. H. (2004). Dementia caregiver burden: Reliability of the Brazilian version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 20, 372-376.
33.
WilliamsS. WAndersonP. D.GoodwinP. Y. (2003). Caregiver role strain: The contribution of multiple roles and available resources in African-American women. Aging & Mental Health, 7, 1003-1012.
34.
ZaritS.H.ReeverK.E.Bach-PetersonJ. (1980). Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist, 20, 649-655.
35.
ZaritS. H.OrrN. K.ZaritJ. M. (1985). Understanding the stress of caregivers: Planning an intervention. In The hidden victims of Alzheimer’s disease: Families under stress (pp. 69-86). New York: New York University Press.
36.
ZaritS.ZaritJ. (1990). The memory and behavior problems checklist—1987R and Burden Interview. University Park, PA: Department of Individual and Family Studies.
