The fact that we all have names makes naming an ubiquitous institution. We develop a game-theoretic model to explain the existence of single names (anthroponyms) and how they may be exchanged as a way to promote cooperation. In social interactions, names provide partial identification information that can help reduce the likelihood of cheating, which would be higher with alternative information structures. We then propose a definition of honor based on the probability of being cheated, and derive general patterns for optimal naming that may maximize honor.
AcemogluDMakhdoumiAMalekianA, et al. (2022) Too much data: prices and inefficiencies in data markets. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics14(4): 218–256.
2.
AgarwalSHuMRLeeAD (2022) Street name fluency and housing prices. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics65(2): 181–229.
3.
AkerlofGAKrantonRE (2000) Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics115(3): 715–753.
4.
AntalTOhtsukiHWakeleyJ, et al. (2009) Evolution of cooperation by phenotypic similarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(21): 8597–8600.
5.
AxelrodRM (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
6.
BaekSKKietHATKimBJ (2007) Family name distributions: master equation approach. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics76(4): 046113.
7.
BaoH-W-SCaiHJingY, et al. (2021) Novel evidence for the increasing prevalence of unique names in China: a reply to Ogihara. Frontiers in Psychology12: 731244.
8.
BaoH-W-SCaiHJingY (2023) Understanding the rise of unique names: the emphasis on uniqueness matters. Acta Psychology Sinica55(12): 1–12.
9.
BarclayP (2016) Biological markets and the effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship. Current Opinion in Psychology7: 33–38.
10.
BaruccaPRocchiJMarinariE, et al. (2015) Cross-correlations of American baby names. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America112(26): 7943–7947.
11.
BeckerGS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy76(2): 169–217.
12.
BergA (2019a) An economic Theory of surnames. ID 3418074. Social Science Research Network, Available at: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3418074 (accessed 2 July 2023).
13.
BergA (2019b) Identity in economics: a review. ID 3421215. Social Science Research Network, Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3421215 (accessed 19 August 2020).
14.
BergA (2020) A simple hostage Model of identity. ID 3569447. Social Science Research Network, Available at: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3569447 (accessed 13 July 2023).
15.
BernheimBD (1994) A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy102(5): 841–877.
CaiHZouXFengY, et al. (2018) Increasing need for uniqueness in contemporary China: empirical evidence. Frontiers in Psychology9: 554.
18.
CarrJLLandaJT (1983) The economics of symbols, clan names, and religion. The Journal of Legal Studies12(1): 135–156.
19.
ChopikWGötschiKCarrilloA, et al. (2024) Changes in need for uniqueness from 2000 until 2020. Collabra: Psychology10(1): 121937.
20.
ConsulPC (1991) Evolution of surnames. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique59(3): 271.
21.
CuestaJAGracia-LázaroCFerrerA, et al. (2015) Reputation drives cooperative behaviour and network formation in human groups. Scientific Reports5(1): 7843.
22.
DijkstraJvan AssenMALM (2017) Explaining cooperation in the finitely repeated simultaneous and sequential prisoner’s dilemma game under incomplete and complete information. Journal of Mathematical Sociology41(1): 1–25.
23.
EinavLYarivL (2006) What’s in a surname? The effects of surname initials on academic success. The Journal of Economic Perspectives20(1): 175–188.
24.
Evans-PritchardEE (1940) The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25.
FoxWRLaskerGW (1983) The distribution of surname frequencies. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique51(1): 81.
26.
GaechterSLeeKSeftonM (2020) Risk, Temptation, and Efficiency in Prisoner’s Dilemmas Discussion Papers 2020-15. University of Nottingham. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/not/notcdx/2020-15.html (accessed 29 August 2021).
27.
GardnerJF (1998) Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28.
GardnerA (2019) The greenbeard effect. Current Biology: CB29(11): R430–R431.
29.
GardnerAWestSA (2010) Greenbeards. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution64(1): 25–38.
30.
GillenBJ (2015) A note on endogenous norms in a theory of conformity. Economics Letters129: 57–61.
31.
GrossmannIVarnumMEW (2015) Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychological Science26(3): 311–324.
32.
GüellMRodriguez MoraJVTelmerCI (2015) The informational content of surnames, the evolution of intergenerational mobility, and assortative mating. The Review of Economic Studies82(2): 693–735.
33.
HahnMWBentleyRA (2003) Drift as a mechanism for cultural change: an example from baby names. Proceedings. Biological sciences270(Suppl 1): S120–S123.
34.
HarsanyiJCSeltenR (1988) General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35.
HechterM (1988) Principles of Group Solidarity. California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy 11. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
HenrichJ (2020) The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
37.
JordanJJHoffmanMBloomP, et al. (2016) Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature530(7591): 473–476.
38.
KangYZhuDHZhangYA (2021) Being extraordinary: how CEOS’ uncommon names explain strategic distinctiveness. Strategic Management Journal42(2): 462–488.
39.
LeeMJJoWSYiIG, et al. (2016) Evolution of popularity in given names. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications443: 415–422.
40.
MailathGJSamuelsonL (2006) Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
MaruvkaYEShnerbNMKesslerDA (2010) Universal features of surname distribution in a subsample of a growing population. Journal of Theoretical Biology262(2): 245–256.
42.
MateosPLongleyPAO’SullivanD (2011) Ethnicity and population structure in personal naming networks. PLoS One6(9): e22943.
43.
MengelF (2018) Risk and temptation: a meta-study on prisoner’s dilemma games. The Economic Journal128(616): 3182–3209.
44.
MignotJ-F (2022) First names given in France, 1800–2019: a window into the process of individualization. Population and Economics6(2): 108–119.
45.
OgiharaY (2021) Direct evidence of the increase in unique names in Japan: the rise of individualism. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences2: 100056.
46.
OgiharaYFujitaHTominagaH, et al. (2015) Are common names becoming less common? The rise in uniqueness and individualism in Japan. Frontiers in Psychology6: 1490.
47.
PeysakhovichANowakMARandDG (2014) Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Communications5(1): 4939.
48.
RioloRLCohenMDAxelrodR (2001) Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature414(6862): 441–443.
49.
SabetPGPZhangG (2020) First names in social and ethnic contexts: a socio-onomastic approach. Language & Communication70: 1–12.
50.
StiglerGJ (1970) The optimum enforcement of laws. Journal of Political Economy78(3): 526–536.
51.
TsebelisG (1990) Penalty has no impact on crime: a game-theoretic analysis. Rationality and Society2(3): 255–286.
52.
TwengeJMAbebeEMCampbellWK (2010) Fitting in or standing out: trends in American parents’ choices for children’s names, 1880–2007. Social Psychological and Personality Science1(1): 19–25.
53.
YoungHP (1998) Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
54.
YoungRKKennedyAHNewhouseA, et al. (1993) The effects of names on perception of intelligence, popularity, and competence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology23(21): 1770–1788.
55.
ZanetteDHManrubiaSC (2001) Vertical transmission of culture and the distribution of family names. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications295(1): 1–8.
