This article focuses on the conditions under which people think that spouses should or should not divorce. In order to explain acceptance of a more or less permissive divorce norm we draw on a theory of norm emergence, arguing that negative externalities of divorces and marriages and integration in divorce-supporting social networks are important determinants for the emergence of norms. We extend this theory by introducing interdependencies between externalities and by arguing that experiencing and suffering from a divorce are related to externalities. Results of a factorial survey indicate that a permissive divorce norm is subscribed to if the quality of the marriage is bad, if both partners have extramarital relationships, and if there are no children. The parents' divorce or having suffered from the parents' divorce does not have the expected direct effects on accepting a permissive divorce norm.
Amato, P.R.1994. `Life-span Adjustment of Children to Their Parents' Divorce .' The Future of Children4: 143—64.
2.
Amato, P.R.1996. `Explaining the Intergenerational Transmission of Divorce .' Journal of Marriage and the Family58: 628—40.
3.
Amato, P.R., L.S. Loomis, and A. Booth.1995. `Parental Divorce, Marital Conflict, and Offspring Well-being during Early Adulthood.' Social Forces73: 895—915.
4.
Berkman, L.F. and S.L. Syme.1979. `Social Networks, Host Resistance, and Mortality: A Nine-year Follow-up Study of Alameda County Residents.' American Journal of Epidemiology109: 186—204.
5.
Bernard, J.1972. The Future of Marriage. New York: World Publishing.
6.
Blankenhorn, D., S. Bayme , and J. B. Elshtain, eds. 1990. Rebuilding the Nest: A New Commitment to the American Family. Milwaukee: Manticore Publishers .
7.
Boudon, R.1996. `The “Cognitivist Model.” A Generalized “Rational-Choice-Model ”.' Rationality and Society8: 123—50.
8.
Bumpass, L.L., T.C. Martin, and J.A. Sweet.1991. `The Impact of Family Background and Early Marital Factors on Marital Disruption.' Journal of Family Issues12: 22—42.
9.
Coleman, J.S.1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA, and London : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
10.
Coontz, S.1992. The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Degler, C.N.1980. At Odds: Women and the Family from the Revolution to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Demsetz, H.1967. `Toward a Theory of Property Rights.' American Economic Review57: 347—59.
13.
Diefenbach, H.1997. `Intergenerationale Scheidungstransmission in Deutschland: Relevanz und Erklärungsansätze.' Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie18: 88—105.
14.
Diefenbach, H.2000a. Intergenerationale Scheidungstransmission in Deutschland: Auf der Suche nach dem `missing link' zwischen Ehescheidung in der Elterngeneration und Ehescheidung in der Kindgeneration. Würzburg: Ergon.
15.
Diefenbach, H.2000b. `Die Modellierung der evolutionären Entstehung einer Scheidungsnorm.' In Normen und Institutionen: Entstehung und Wirkungen, eds R. Metze, K. Mühler, and K.-D. Opp, pp. 235—48. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
16.
Eggertsson, T.1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Frey, B.S.1999. Economics as a Science of Human Behaviour: Towards a New Social Science Paradigm. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18.
Furstenberg, F.F., Jr and J.O. Teitler.1994. `Reconsidering the Effects of Marital Disruption. What Happens to Children of Divorce in Early Adulthood?' Journal of Family Issues15: 173—90.
19.
Gilovich, Thomas. 1991. How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: The Free Press.
20.
Glenn, N.D. and Kathryn B. Kramer .1987. `The Marriages and Divorces of the Children of Divorce.' Journal of Marriage and the Family49: 811—25.
21.
Goldthorpe, J.H.1998. `Rational Action Theory for Sociology.' British Journal of Sociology49: 167—92.
22.
Goode, W.J.1959. `The Theoretical Importance of Romantic Love.' American Sociological Review24: 38—47.
23.
Hechter, M. and K.-D. Opp.2001. `What Have We Learned about the Emergence of Social Norms?' In Social Norms, eds M. Hechter and K.-D. Opp, pp. 394—416. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
Heckathorn, D.1991. `Extensions of the Prisoner's Dilemma Paradigm: The Altruist's Dilemma and Group Solidarity.' Sociological Theory9: 34—52.
25.
Hetherington, E.M. and J. Kelly.2002. For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered . New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Inc.
26.
Hirshleifer, J.1985. `The Expanding Domain of Economics.' American Economic Review75: 53—68.
27.
Hochschild, A.R. and A. Machung.1989. The Second Shift. New York: Viking.
28.
Hu, Y. and N. Goldmann.1990. `Mortality Differentials by Marital Status: An International Comparison.' Demography27: 232—50.
29.
Huber, P.J.1967. `The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Under Non-standard Conditions.' In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 221—33. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
Jankowiak, W. and E.F. Fischer.1992. `A Cross-cultural Perspective on Romantic Love.' Ethnology31: 149—55.
31.
Jasso, G. and K.-D. Opp.1997. `Probing the Character of Norms: A Factorial Survey Analysis of the Norms of Political Action.' American Sociological Review62: 947—64.
32.
Keith, V.M. and B. Finlay.1988. `The Impact of Parental Divorce on Children's Educational Attainment, Marital Timing, and Likelihood of Divorce.' Journal of Marriage and the Family50: 797—809.
33.
Kitts, James A.2006. `Collective Action, Rival Incentives and the Emergence of Antisocial Norms.' American Sociological Review71: 235—59.
34.
Lee, G.R. and L.H. Stone.1980: `Mate-selection Systems and Criteria: Variation according to Family Structure.' Journal of Marriage and the Family42: 319—26.
35.
Office for National Statistics.2000. Population Trends 113, Table 1: Dissolutions and Annulments of Marriage, 1971, 1981, 1991, 1996, 1999—2002 (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/ssdataset.asp?Vlnk=70070).
36.
Opp, K.-D.1990. `The Attenuation of Customs.' In Social Institutions: Their Emergence, Maintenance, and E fects, eds M. Hechter, K.-D. Opp , and R. Wippler, pp. 119—39. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
37.
Opp, K.-D.1999. `Contending Conceptions of the Theory of Rational Action .' Journal of Theoretical Politics11: 171—202.
38.
Opp, K.-D.2001. `Social Networks and the Emergence of Protest Norms.' In Social Norms, eds M. Hechter and K.-D. Opp, pp. 234—73. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
Opp, K.-D.2002. `When Do Norms Emerge by Human Design and When by the Unintended Consequences of Human Action? The Example of the No-smoking Norm .' Rationality and Society14: 131—58.
40.
Pasternak, B., C.R. Ember, and M. Ember.1997. Sex, Gender, and Kinship: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
41.
Peuckert, R.1996. Familienformen im sozialen Wandel. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
42.
Pope, H. and C.W. Mueller.1976. `The Intergenerational Transmission of Marital Instability: Comparisons by Race and Sex.' Journal of Social Issues32: 49—66.
43.
Popenoe, D.1988. Disturbing the Nest: Family Change and Decline in Modern Societies. New York: de Gruyter .
44.
Popenoe, D.1993. `American Family Decline, 1960—1990: A Review and Appraisal.' Journal of Marriage and the Family55: 527—55.
45.
Popper, Karl R.1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
46.
Rossi, P.H.1979. `Vignette Analysis: Uncovering the Normative Structure of Complex Judgments' In Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, eds R.K. Merton, J. S. Coleman, and P. H. Rossi, pp. 176—85. New York : Free Press.
47.
Rossi, P.H. and Anderson, A.B.1982. `The Factorial Survey Design: An Introduction.' In Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach, eds P. H. Rossi and S. L. Nock, pp. 15—67. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
48.
Scanzoni, J.1965. `A Reinquiry into Marital Disorganization.' Journal of Marriage and the Family27: 483—91.
49.
Schwartz, M.A. and B.M. Scott.2000. Marriages and Families: Diversity and Change. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
50.
Simon, H.A.1983. Reason in Human A fairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Skolnick , A.S.1991. Embattled Paradise: The American Family in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Basic Books.
51.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman.1974. `Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.' Science185: 1124—31.
52.
Waite, L.J. and M. Gallagher.2000. The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better o f Financially. New York: Broadway Books. Wallerstein, J.S. and S. Blakeslee.1989. Second Chances: Men, Women, and Children a Decade after Divorce. New York: Ticknor & Fields.
53.
Wallerstein, J.S., J. Lewis, and S. Blakeslee.2000. The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: A 25 Year Landmark Study. New York: Hyperion.
54.
Webster-Stratton, C.1989. `The Relationship of Marital Support, Conflict, and Divorce to Parents' Perceptions, Behaviors, and Childhood Conduct Problems.' Journal of Marriage and the Family51: 417—30.
55.
Zetterberg, Hans L.1965. On Theory and Verification in Sociology, 3rd edn. New York: Bedminster Press.
