It took the European Union (EU) 35 years to achieve a co-operative agreement on
co-ordinated measures of savings taxation. Political science has offered two
explanations for this. First, co-operation is difficult to achieve as a result of
heterogeneity. Countries with a small domestic tax base favor tax competition, while
countries with a large tax base prefer tax co-operation. Second, co-operation is
difficult as a consequence of specific characteristics of the collective action
problem involved. The actors face a prisoners’ dilemma. Both explanations
have their limits. The first approach is not very good at predicting actual policy
preferences of governments and the second approach dismisses the fact that the EU
offers cooperative institutions that should be able to resolve a dilemma. The paper
refines these explanations such that the theory fits better the empirical positions
of EU governments and their problems of finding an agreement.
Bates, R.H.
,
A. Greif
,
M. Levi
,
J.-L. Rosenthal
and
B. Weingast
(eds). 1998. Analytical Narratives.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
2.
Bernauer, T. 2000. Staaten im Weltmarkt. Zur Handlungsfähigkeit von
Staaten trotz wirtschaftlicher Globalisierung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
3.
Brennan, G.
and
J.M. Buchanan
. 1980. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations for a Fiscal
Constitution.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
4.
Bucovetsky, S.
and
J.D. Wilson
. 1991.
‘Tax Competition with Two Tax Instruments.’Regional Science and Urban Economics21:
333-350
.
5.
CEPS.2001. EU Corporate Tax Reform. Report of a CEPS Working Party.
Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies
.
6.
Dehejia, V.H.
and
P. Genschel
. 1999.
‘Tax Competition in the European Union.’Politics & Society27:
403-430
.
7.
Devereux, M.P.
,
R. Griffith
and
A. Klemm
. 2002.
‘Corporate Income Tax Reforms and International Tax Competition.’Economic Policy35:
451-495
.
8.
Edwards, J.
and
M. Keen
. 1996.
‘Tax Competition and Leviathan.’European Economic Review40:
113-134
.
9.
Eggert, W.2000. Capital Tax Competition with Inefficient Government
Spending. CoFE Discussion Paper No 99-15,
Center of Finance and Econometrics, University of
Constance, Germany
.
10.
European Commission (EC)
. 1967. Program for the Harmonization of Direct Taxes.
Communication by the Commission, Bulletin of the EC, Supplement 8 (1967): 6-22.
11.
EC. 1988. Creation of an [sic] European Financial Area. Communication by the
Commission, COM/87/550/final.
12.
EC. 1989. Proposal for a Council Directive on a Common System of Withholding
Tax on Interest Income, COM/89/69/final, OJ C 141, 07.06.89.
13.
EC. 1996. Taxation in the European Union: Report on the Development of Tax
Systems.COM/96/546/final, 22.10.96.
14.
EC. 1998. Proposal for a Council Directive to Ensure a Minimum of Effective
Taxation of Savings Income in the Form of Interest Payments within the Community.
COM/98/0295/final - CNS 98/0193, OJ C 212, 08.07.98.
15.
EC. 2001. Proposal for a Council Directive to Ensure a Minimum of Effective
Taxation of Savings Income in the Form of Interest Payments within the Community.
COM/01/0400/final - CNS 01/0164, OJ C 270E, 25.09.01.
16.
EC. 2002. Report on the Negotiations with Third Countries about the Taxation
of Interests. Communication by the Commission to Council Ecofin, 03.12.02 (internal document).
17.
European Council/Ecofin 2000. Report on the Tax Package (Doc. 1355500 FISC
190). Santa Maria da Feira: European Council.
18.
Eurostat2001. Special Feature on Banking.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of
the European Communities
.
19.
Frey, B.S.1990. ‘Intergovernmental tax
competition,’ in
Charles McLureet al.
(eds), Influence of Tax Differentials on International
Competitiveness, pp. 89-114.
Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers
.
20.
Frey, B.S.
and
R. Eichenberger
. 1996.
‘To Harmonize or Compete? That’s Not the Question.’Journal of Public Economics60:
335-349
.
21.
Fuest, C.2000.
‘The Political Economy of Tax Coordination as a Bargaining Game
between Bureaucrats and Politicians.’Public Choice103:
357-382
.
22.
Fuest, C.
and
B. Huber
. 1999.
‘Can Tax Coordination Work?’Finanzarchiv56:
443-458
.
23.
Genschel, P. 2002. Steuerharmonisierung und Steuerwettbewerb in der
Europäischen Union. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
24.
Genschel, P.
and
T. Plümper
. 1997.
‘Regulatory Competition and International Co-operation.’Journal of European Public Policy4:
626-642
.
25.
Giovannini, Alberto
and
James R. Hines
. 1991. ‘Capital Flight and Tax Competition: Are
There Viable Solutions to Both Problems?’ in
Alberto Giovannini
and
Colin Mayer
(eds), European Financial Integration, pp.
172-220.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
26.
Hahn, W. 1988. Steuerpolitische Willensbildungsprozesse in der
Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Das Beispiel der Umsatzsteuerharmonisierung.
Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.
27.
Hallerberg, M.1996.
‘Tax Competition in Wilhelmine Germany and its Implications for
the European Union.’World Politics48:
324-357
.
28.
Hirshleifer, J.1983.
‘From Weakest-link to Best-shot: The Voluntary Provision of
Public Goods.’Public Choice41:
371-386
.
29.
Holzinger, K.2001.
‘Aggregation Technology of Common Goods and its Strategic
Consequences. Global Warming, Biodiversity, and Siting Conflicts.’European Journal of Political Research40:
117-138
.
30.
Kanbur, R.
and
M. Keen
. 1993.
‘Jeux sans frontières: Tax Competition and Tax
Coordination When Countries Differ in Size.’Economic Review29:
81-85
.
31.
Keen, M.1993.
‘The Welfare Economics of Tax Co-ordination in the European
Community: A Survey.’Fiscal Studies14:
15-36
.
32.
Koelliker, A.2001.
‘Bringing Together or Driving Apart the Union? Towards a Theory
of Differentiated Integration.’West European Politics24:
125-151
.
33.
Krause, H.-J. 2001. ‘Harmonisierung der Zinsbesteuerung in
Europa.’ Die Bank 2001/3: 204-213.
34.
Myles, G.D.2000.
‘Wasteful Government, Tax Evasion, and the Provision of Public Goods.’European Journal of Political Economy16:
51-74
.
35.
OECD.1998. Harmful Tax Competition. An Emerging Global Issue.
Paris: OECD
.
36.
OECD.2000. Improving Access to Bank Information for Tax Purposes.
Paris: OECD
.
37.
OECD.2002. Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters.
Paris: OECD
: Available at:
http://www.oecd.org/EN/document/0,,EN-document-22-nodirectorate-no-12-2853-22,00
(accessed 16 February 2003).
38.
Perman, R.
,
Y. Ma
and
J. McGilvray
. 1998. Natural Resources and Environmental Economics.
London, New York: Longman
.
39.
Radaelli, C.M.1998.
‘Game Theory and Institutional Entrepreneurship: Transfer Pricing
and the Search for Coordination in International Tax Policy.’Policy Studies Journal26:
603-619
.
40.
Radaelli, C.M.2003.
‘The Code of Conduct against Harmful Tax Competition: Open Method
of Coordination in Disguise?’Public Administration81:
513-531
.
41.
Sandler, T.1997. Global Challenges. An Approach to Environmental, Political,
and Economic Problems.
New York: Cambridge University Press
.
42.
Sinn, H.-W.1990.
‘Tax Harmonization and Tax Competition in Europe.’European Economic Review34:
489-504
.
43.
Sinn, H.-W.1997.
‘The Selection Principle and Market Failure in Systems Competition.’Journal of Public Economics66:
247-274
.
44.
Thomas, K.P.2002.
‘The Politics of an Emergent Global Regime for Controlling Tax Competition.’Policy Studies Journal30:
270-284
.
