Using a simultaneous probit model, the present study examines differences in potential viewership of federal legislative television across the 50 states. A unique 1986 survey of C-SPAN2 subscribership provided by Crain and Goff (1988) is employed. With data from the 99th Congress, the estimates suggest that senators with great potential constituent audiences will exhibit an increased likelihood of employing parliamentary devices (such as the filibuster) that offer an opportunity for political posturing or grandstanding in a persuasive advertising manner.
Binder, S.A.
, and S.S. Smith. 1997. Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
2.
Crain, W.M.
and B.L. Goff. 1988. Televised Legislatures: Political Information Technology and Public Choice. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3.
Downs, A.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
4.
Fournier, G.M.
and D.W. Rasmussen. 1986. `Salaries in Public Education: The Impact of Geographic Cost-of-Living Differentials.' Public Finance Quarterly14: 178-198.
5.
Greene, K.V.1992. `The Nature of Political Services, Legislative Turnover, and Television.' Public Choice70: 267-276.
6.
Greene, W.H.1997. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Hayaratne, J.1996. `A Note on the Implementation of Cable TV Rate Caps.' Review of Industrial Organization11: 823-840.
8.
Kennedy, P.1998. A Guide to Econometrics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Krehbiel, K.1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of US Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Maddala, G.S.1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Mixon, F.G., Jr.2001. `A Discrete-Time Hazard Model of the Adoption of Legislative Television: Evidence from the US Congress, 1961-1986.' Applied Economics33: 1881-1887.
12.
Mixon, F.G., Jr., M.T. Gibson and K.P. Upadhyaya. 2001. `Has Legislative Television Changed Legislator Behavior? C-SPAN2 and the Frequency of Senate Filibustering.' Public Choice, forthcoming.
13.
Mixon, F.G., Jr.
, D.L. Hobson and K.P. Upadhyaya. 2001. `Gavel-to-Gavel Congressional Television Coverage as Political Advertising: The Impact of C-SPAN on Legislative Sessions.' Economic Inquiry39: 351-364.
14.
Mixon, F.G., Jr. and K.P. Upadhyaya. 2001. `Legislative Television as an Institutional Entry Barrier: The Impact of C-SPAN2 on Turnover in the US Senate, 1946-1998.' Public Choice, forthcoming.
15.
Mueller, D.C.
and T. Stratmann. 1994. `Informative and Persuasive Campaigning.' Public Choice81: 55-77.
16.
Nelson, P.1970. `Information and Consumer Behavior.' Journal of Political Economy77: 311-329.
17.
Nelson, P.1974. `Advertising and Information.' Journal of Political Economy81: 729-754.
18.
Poole, K.T.
and H. Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Stigler, G.J.1961. `The Economics of Information.' Journal of Political Economy68: 213- 25.
20.
Upadhyaya, K.P.
, J.E. Raymond and F.G. Mixon, Jr.1997. `The Economic Theory of Regulation versus Alternative Theories for the Electric Utilities Industry: A Simultaneous Probit Model.' Resource and Energy Economics19: 191-202.
